Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The New Part-Time Re-Employment Grant (PTRG), implemented by Workforce Singapore, Singapore Government Agency and Ministry of Manpower, provides funding support of up to $125,000 per company who offers part-time re-employment opportunities, flexible work arrangements and structured career planning to older workers. Employers recieve funding support to implement the part-time re-employment policy for older workers and encourages them to remain in the workforce by offering flexible working opportunities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The grant benefits senior workers aged 60 and above by incentivizing employers to offer part-time re-employment, flexible work arrangements (FWAs), and structured career planning (SCP)—thus aiding retention and sustained workforce participation.

What were the results?

Employers can receive up to S$2,500 per resident senior worker, capped at S$125,000 per company—enabling them to adopt age-friendly workplace practices and offer greater employment flexibility to seniors.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower and Workforce Singapore, PTRG is delivered through the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF). Employers apply via formal channels and must adopt specific HR policies while attending workshops to qualify.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It uses targeted incentives to embed structured flexibility and age-friendly policies in workplaces, enabling senior workers to remain active contributors in an adaptable, inclusive employment model.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Workforce Singapore, Singapore Government Agency, Ministry of Manpower
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The New Zealand Framework for Dementia Care, implemented by the New Zealand Government and Ministry of Health, is a framework that provides district health boards (DHBs) and the health and social suppor sector with a guide for developing dementia care pathways. This framework provides a guide that DHBs can use to develop clear, consistent, well-resourced and easily accessible dementia care pathways, whilst promoting national consistency in dementia care.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primarily people living with dementia and their family/whānau carers across New Zealand—benefiting from structured, community-oriented, primary care among DHBs.

What were the results?

The programme supports improved diagnosis and care coordination, easing pressure on specialist services. It enabled primary-care-led, standardized dementia pathways with clearer referral routes, education for providers, and routine carer respite. This structure has been noted as a promising, transferable model for enhancing dementia management. The approach has also mitigated long-term residential care costs by promoting earlier, community-based intervention that delays entry into aged residential care with potential savings estimated up to NZ$22 million per month.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed centrally by the Ministry of Health, the framework was funded for roll‑out through DHBs. It adopted a primary-care‑led model, offering education to primary providers, structured referral mechanisms, and consistent support tools for carers, all delivered via the DHB network.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a nationally implemented, primary-care-led, evidence-based model that standardizes dementia care pathways, enhances early diagnosis, supports carers, and reduces reliance on costly institutional care—demonstrating both cost-effectiveness and improved patient outcomes.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of New Zealand, Ministry of Health
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
2013
What was implemented?

The Cook Islands’ social pension scheme is a universal, non-contributory benefit for all residents aged 60 and over, designed to ensure financial security in old age. Administered by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, it requires residency of at least 10 years for Cook Islanders and 20 years for non-Cook Islanders, plus continuous residence for 12 months before applying. Payments are made twice monthly, with those aged 60–69 receiving NZ$250 per payment (NZ$500/month) and those 70+ receiving NZ$350 per payment (NZ$700/month). This long-standing program, in place since the 1960s, provides nearly universal coverage and promotes social inclusion and dignity for older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The beneficiaries are older persons in the Cook Islands. 

What were the results?

The non-contributory pensions provides basic income security to older persons in the Cook Islands. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The Cook Islands’ universal social pension was developed as part of a long-standing commitment to social protection and inclusion for older persons. Introduced in the mid-1960s, it aimed to provide a basic income for all residents aged 60 and over, regardless of employment history or income, to reduce poverty and promote dignity in old age.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a good practice because it provides basic income security to older persons in the Cook Islands. It is a universal scheme. With clear residency rules, it is simple to administer and easy to access. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Internal Affairs
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Cook Islands
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
1960
What was implemented?

The Nonthaburi Municipality Older Persons Quality of Life Development Centre is a municipal initiative established to promote active ageing, lifelong learning, health and social participation among older persons. Opened in 2012, the centre provides a dedicated space where older persons can engage in physical exercise, recreation, educational activities and social interaction. The municipality regularly engages volunteer instructors and specialists to provide training and learning opportunities. Activities include fitness and rehabilitation exercises, dance, music, arts, language learning and cultural programmes. The centre aims to strengthen physical and mental well-being, encourage social inclusion and support older persons to remain active contributors to their communities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Adults aged 45 years and above eligible for membership programmes in Nonthaburi Province

What were the results?

The centre has become a focal point for older persons in Nonthaburi Municipality and a platform for exchanging experiences and developing skills.

How was it developed and implemented?

Recognizing the growing number of older persons and the need to support their well-being, Nonthaburi Municipality designated the promotion of older persons' quality of life as a policy priority. The municipality constructed a dedicated centre and established a programme of daily activities designed around health promotion, recreation, lifelong learning and social engagement. The centre collaborates with volunteer experts, instructors and community resource persons who provide training and activities in diverse fields. Implementation is municipality-led and enables older persons to choose activities according to their interests, abilities and needs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice demonstrates how local governments can create an integrated community-based environment for active ageing. Rather than focusing solely on care services, the centre promotes health, lifelong learning, recreation and social participation in a single facility. The broad range of activities allows older persons with different interests and capacities to remain engaged in community life. Municipal leadership, dedicated infrastructure and the use of volunteer experts contribute to sustainability. The model supports several dimensions of active ageing, including health promotion, social inclusion, continued learning and opportunities for meaningful participation.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Nonthaburi Municipality (เทศบาลนครนนทบุรี)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Disability and age friendly environment); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

Organized through a public Facebook group with over 1500 members as of early 2026, Nordic Walking in Tashkent has become quite the informal grassroots movement for older persons (and not only) to look after their health through age-appropriate physical activity. The Facebook group organizers run trainings for new participants to learn the right techniques. Aside from the health benefits, it is also an enjoyable social activity, as people come together in groups for organized walks and friendly competitions, such as the "Tashkent Friendship Marathon". Often the walking destinations are an exhibition or other social activity. In some cases, whole families take part, adding a distinctly intergenerational dimension.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The Nordic Walking group is focused mainly on older generations, but participation by all generations is welcome.

How was it developed and implemented?

It all started with a solitary New Year's walk of one of the movement's pioneers, Ms. Tamara Sanaeva - who also created the Facebook group. At first, the sight of a woman striding briskly along the pavement with two walking poles drew curious glances. Just a few years later, groups of Nordic walkers have become a familiar feature of Tashkent’s urban landscape.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

One of the advantages of Nordic Walking is that you can do it nearly anywhere and little equipment is needed. Not only does it improve older persons' health and wellbeing but also helps bridge social isolation and finding new friends.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing)
Country:
Uzbekistan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
first organized walks started in 2018
What was implemented?

The Old Age Allowance (OAA) Programme was implemented in 1998 by the Bangladesh Government, Cabinet Division and General Economics Division of Bangladesh Planning Commission. This pogramme aimed to provide income scurity for older persons from poor, vulnerable and insecure families, whilst removing th perception of older persons being a burden. This programme is one of the schemes that the Bangladeshi Government has in place to ensure older persons that face poverty are recieving social safety, with plans to bring all older persons under the ’universal social pension scheme’.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The allowance targets vulnerable elderly citizens—men aged 65+ and women aged 62+—from low-income households, especially those who are physically or mentally frail, landless, or socially isolated.

What were the results?

The programme significantly expanded its coverage and benefit level over time, enhancing the income security of older persons in Bangladesh. It contributed to improved well-being and social dignity of beneficiaries, enabling better access to basic needs such as food, healthcare, and personal care.

How was it developed and implemented?

Established under the Social Safety Net Program by the Department of Social Services, the allowance is distributed through local administrative units using a means-tested, multi-tiered selection process involving community and Upazila committees. Funding is allocated each fiscal year through the national budget with implementation overseen by government authorities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It demonstrates scalable, inclusive social protection—targeting the most vulnerable seniors with financial support that restores their dignity, improves access to basic needs, and fosters social inclusion across decades.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Bangladesh, Cabinet Division, General Economics Division (GED) of Bangladesh Planning Commission
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Bangladesh
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1998
What was implemented?

Old People’s Home for 4-Year-Olds, a factual documentary television series on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), brings together older persons and 4-year-olds in a social experiment to explore whether intergenerational contact can improve older persons’ health and well-being. The series includes expert guidance and tests the impact of children’s interactions on the elderly, showing significant improvements in mood, movement and mobility.

Who were the beneficiaries?

older adults living in residential aged care and 4-year-old preschool children. Both generations benefited socially, emotionally, and cognitively.

What were the results?

By 2023, The programme supports over 40 new intergenerational centres nationwide, strengthening social inclusion, enhancing older persons’ well-being, and inspiring new jobs and funding models for community care.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as a structured social experiment, the show brought together experts in child development, geriatrics, and physiotherapy. It introduced shared activities, clinically monitored impacts, and later inspired replication through local organisations and pilot programs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It demonstrated strong, evidence-based intergenerational impact, drove policy change, and inspired replication—bridging entertainment, research, and public engagement.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

A monthly non-contributory cash benefit provided by the Thai government to citizens aged 60 and over, aimed at easing living expenses and ensuring a basic social safety net. The scheme is near-universal. It is for citizens not receiving other significant state-supported pensions or benefits (e.g., military or civil service pensions, salary from government entities, or welfare targeted at specific groups). The allowance is tiered by age. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons over 60 in Thailand

What were the results?

Now over 10 million older citizens are covered. It provides a basic income for older persons. 

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed as part of the government’s social welfare policy to provide a basic income for older persons without pensions or formal retirement benefits. It was introduced in the early 1990s as a small-scale welfare initiative for vulnerable seniors only targeting low-income older persons. In 2009 it was scaled up to cover nearly all Thai citizens aged 60 years or over. It is funded entirely by the national government budget. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides basic universal income security for all older persons in Thailand

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security has policy oversight. It is implemented through local administrative offices which handle registration, verification and distribution
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2009 (introduced)
What was implemented?

Older People’s Associations (OPAs) are community-based organizations led by older persons that promote active ageing, social participation, mutual support, health, livelihood security and representation. OPAs provide meeting spaces, organize collective activities, support vulnerable older persons, facilitate access to health services and social assistance, and serve as a channel between older persons and local authorities. They participate in commune and district development planning and help address isolation, poverty and exclusion among older persons. The Government recognizes OPAs as a key mechanism for implementing the National Ageing Policy 2017–2030 and promoting active ageing. They play a role in implementing all MIPAA priority directions. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Cambodia. 

What were the results?

According to HelpAge Cambodia, as of 2025, there were over 2,000 OPAs in Cambodia. 

OPAs increased opportunities for social participation, active ageing, health promotion and representation of older persons. They facilitated involvement of older persons in commune and district development planning and supported health screenings, referrals, home visits, social care and livelihood initiatives. During COVID-19 pandemic, OPAs helped disseminate information and improve vaccine access.

How was it developed and implemented?

The OPA model emerged as a community-based approach to enable older persons to organize collectively and address their own needs. HelpAge International pioneered the model in Cambodia and produced practical guidance on OPA establishment and management. OPAs were designed as self-managed associations promoting social support, health education, livelihood activities, advocacy and community participation.

The Government subsequently institutionalized the model through the 2009 OPA Guidelines and incorporated OPAs into the National Ageing Policy 2017–2030. Local authorities were encouraged to establish OPAs in communes and sangkats nationwide. Older persons became directly involved in local development planning and policy implementation through OPA structures.

HelpAge Cambodia continued supporting OPA capacity development, fundraising, leadership training and programme implementation. Together with MoSVY and partners, it also developed intergenerational OPA approaches that engage younger community members alongside older people.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The OPA model is a good practice because it places older persons at the centre of planning, implementation and decision-making. It combines active ageing, peer support, community participation, health promotion and social inclusion through locally owned institutions. OPAs provide a sustainable mechanism for linking older persons with public services and local authorities while addressing isolation and vulnerability. The model has been scaled nationally, embedded in government policy, and strengthened through collaboration among government, civil society and development partners, demonstrating strong potential for replication

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
MoSVY plays the central coordinating role through the Cambodian National Committee for the Elderly (CNCE)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Cambodia
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2009
What was implemented?

Comprehensive national strategy, includes a toolkit for older workers and an extension of an already existing wage subsidy for those seeking jobs aged 65+. Additionally, there is return to work coaching available for those over 50.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older workers aged 50+, with an emphasis on diversity across Māori, Pacific, disabled, and regional communities.

What were the results?

Over 1,000 businesses have used the toolkit to redesign their jobs to work for an ageing workforce. This strategy has contributed to New Zealand having very high labour force participation rates for those over 65 years.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed through  collaboration between governments, community groups and different businesses. It is now a core aspect of employment strategies to tackle ageism as well as skill shortages, as it keeps experienced workers contributing to the economy.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This strategy treats older persons as economic agents, as they have much to contribute to the workforce. It addresses age discrimination while still applying wage subsidies for employers to hire seniors.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Social Development and Office for Seniors
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2025

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.