Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The Training Programme for Journalists, implemented by UNFPA and national and local Governments in Kazakhstan, was a webinar that was held in 2021 for journalists to promote the welfare and empowerment of older persons. The training, taregted at journalists, aimed to portary a positive image of older persons in society and change their attitudes towards older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Over 24 journalists from national print and digital media in Kazakhstan, representatives from the Ministry of Information and Social Development, and NGOs working on older persons’ welfare.

What were the results?

The initiative enhanced journalists’ capacity to portray older persons positively and from a rights-based perspective. Participants reported gaining valuable insights into changing global attitudes on ageing and recognized media’s role as a driver of social change.

How was it developed and implemented?

Organized by UNFPA with funding from the CISPop programme, it was delivered as a two-day webinar facilitated by an ageing policy expert. Training covered media portrayals of older people, findings from a 2020 survey on socio-economic needs, and principles of active and healthy ageing applied in Kazakhstan.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It combines data and media capacity-building, enabling journalists to challenge ageist stereotypes and foster inclusive narratives on ageing.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
UN entity (UNFPA) and National and local governments
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests (TG-FWAR), implemented by the Tripatriate Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices in Singapore, aims to help older persons looking for flexible work. Through categories like Flexi-Place (working from home), ’Flexi-Time’ (adjustable work hours), and ’Flexi-Load’ (Adjustable workloads), employees can balance work with personal responsabilities - encouraging older persons to continue working and contributing to society.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All employees in Singapore, particularly caregivers, women workers, and older employees—enabling them to formally request flexible work arrangements to balance caregiving and work responsibilities.

What were the results?

The guidelines formalise flexible work as standard practice: employers must put in place a clear process for formal FWA requests, provide written decisions with stated reasons, and assess each request on legitimate business considerations—while discouraging rejections based on mere supervisor preference or distrust—thereby improving transparency, fairness and workplace trust.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed through a Tripartite Workgroup (involving government, employers, and unions), the guidelines were crafted via stakeholder consultations, aiming to embed formal mechanisms supportive of flexible work. They were rolled out as mandatory employer practices addressing procedural clarity and decision transparency.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It institutionalizes flexible work as a norm, embedding fair, transparent procedures and two-way accountability, while empowering employees—especially caregivers—to remain in the workforce through performance-based flexibility.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) and Ministry of Manpower (MOM)
Categories:
Older persons and development; Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The Turkiye Healthy Ageing Action Plan, implemented by the Turkiye Government and Minsitry of Health, aimed to offer accessible, convenient, effective and active healthcare services to people with special needs due to physical, mental, social or conomic circumstances by providing them easier access to favourable healthcare services.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The plan specifically targeted older persons, particularly those with physical, mental, social, or economic vulnerabilities, aiming to improve access to tailored healthcare and promote active, dignified aging.

What were the results?

The programme supported comprehensive geriatric assessment and long-term care planning, which helped improve functional status and quality of life, while reducing mortality and nursing home placements.

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed by Turkey’s Ministry of Health, alongside its Public Health Institution and Department of Chronic Diseases, Elderly Health and Disabled People, in collaboration with universities, NGOs and international frameworks (WHO Europe’s 2012–2020 strategy and UN Decade of Healthy Ageing). Oversight was by the Health Ministry Undersecretary.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It’s a good practice due to its integrated, evidence-based, multi-stakeholder approach—aligning international frameworks with national implementation, improving functional outcomes, and reducing institutionalization in older adults.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Türkiye, Ministry of Health
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2015-2020
What was implemented?

A national Healthy Ageing Action Plan and Implementation Programme for 2021-2026, which established a strategic framework to promote healthy, active and dignified ageing across the life course. The plan sets out coordinated actions to prevent non-communicable diseases, strengthen primary and preventive healthcare for older persons, improve access to age-friendly health services and reduce health inequalities among older women and men. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Government agencies who are provided with clear action plants. Older persons are the eventual beneficiaries. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The plan was created through a multistage, evidence‑based, multisectoral process guided by national demographic trends, international frameworks, and contributions from multiple institutions. It was initially developed by the Ministry of health and aligned with international frameworks on ageing. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This policy can be seen as a good practice through its comprehensive, life-course and evidence based approach to healthy ageing. It integrates prevention, healthcare service delivery, gender sensitivity and intersectoral collaboration within a single national framework. Its emphasis on monitoring and evaluation, community engagement and sustainability aligns with international healthy ageing standards.

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/2292

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Health as lead agency
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan, Monitoring framework)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

This technology-driven care system uses AI, robotics, cloud platforms, and smart sensors to provide seniors in need with comprehensive support. It also facilitates interaction among users and devices, such as between the elderly and caregivers. Through the cloud-based intelligent elderly care service platform, the system provides active assistance, such as health and safety monitoring, guidance on mental and physical activities, and diet management.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older adults with reduced mobility or who require daily support.

What were the results?

Strong integration of technology speeds up responses to care needs and personalized care services. It contributes to the well-being of older adults while reducing the burden on caregivers.

How was it developed and implemented?

The company builds partnerships with healthcare providers and care institutions across multiple sites to develop care solutions that support older persons and caregivers. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It shows how technology can effectively create supportive environments for older adults and their caregivers. The solution promotes healthy aging principles by providing an interactive care experience.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
UB Tech
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The INBO study investigated the quality and dynamics of relationships between urban youth (18–30 years) and elders (60+) in ten metro and non-metro Indian cities. Findings reveal a dichotomy: youth view elders as both wise and respected (51–43%) and lonely and dependent (56–48%), while 86% of elders feel valued yet emotionally disconnected, often excluded from key decisions—even within their own families. Interactions occur frequently but are hindered by generational gaps and communication barriers. While elders increasingly access digital tools with youth support, many still face challenges in tech usage, financial dependency, and limited awareness of support schemes. The report recommends empathy-focused public education, youth-led digital training, strengthened care infrastructure, and structured intergenerational programs to foster meaningful emotional bonds and mutual understanding.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Direct beneficiaries will be policymakers and civil society designing intergenerational programmes and programmes on older persons, including programmes on digital literacy of older persons. 

What were the results?

The survey generated primary data on intergenerational relationships in metropolitan areas of India, which can be used for evidence-based policy-making. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The study used using a mixed-methods approach—surveying 5,798 individuals and hosting eight focus group discussions. The study was conducted across ten Indian cities — Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad, Kanpur, Nagpur, and Madurai — representing a mix of metro and non-Metro cities across regions.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The study collected primary data and promotes evidence-based policymaking. It is also linked to a campaign to address abuse of older persons. Thus, research results are used to raise awareness and trigger change. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
HelpAge India
Categories:
Data and research; Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect, Combatting ageism)
Country:
India
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

The older person Care Unit (UPWE) programme was introduced to provide free transportation services for elderly individuals to access hospitals and health clinics for medical check-ups and treatments. It also supports their social needs when necessary.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Malaysia requiring transportation to healthcare services

What were the results?

The initiative improved access to healthcare services for older persons, reduced the financial burden of transportation, and promoted social inclusion by enabling seniors to attend medical appointments. It also strengthened community support through collaboration with voluntary welfare organisations. Currently, nine vehicles are deployed across several states in Peninsular Malaysia, with seniors booking services through local centres.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme originated as a government initiative to address mobility challenges among older persons. It was planned in partnership with older persons Activity Centres, Welfare Homes, and Voluntary Welfare Organisations.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

UPWE removes a major barrier to healthcare access for older persons, offers cost-free services, and uses a community-based approach that promotes sustainability. It is replicable and scalable, and it directly improves health outcomes and quality of life for seniors.

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Welfare Services, Malaysia
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The Universal Old-Age Allowance, implemented by the Nepalese Government, is a component of the social security allowance (SSA) -the largest social assistance programme in Nepal. The old-age pension is intended for those considered socially and/or economically vulnerable, with the scheme having gone from providing cash grants to 75+ year-olds to now include five schemes that target the older generation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Nepal’s SSA covers older persons (60+ for Dalits/Karnali, 70+ for others), single women 60+ and widows any age, persons with disabilities, endangered ethnic groups, and children under five from poor households.

What were the results?

Nepal’s Social Security Allowance shows sustained commitment, with NPR 109 billion allocated for FY 2025/26 and continued protection for existing old-age beneficiaries.

How was it developed and implemented?

Government-financed cash transfers administered by the Department of Civil Registration (DOCR) (formerly under the Ministry of Federal Affairs & Local Development), with local offices enrolling beneficiaries and payments historically made in cash several times a year; the government planned/has been moving toward MIS digitisation and bank-based payments. Policy milestones include the 2008 reform (age thresholds, new categories) and subsequent budget-driven adjustments.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Nepal’s Social Security Allowance features a universal, lifecycle design with simple eligibility criteria that reach multiple vulnerable groups at scale. The scheme is domestically financed and institutionalised through the Department of Civil Registration (DOCR), with continuous policy adjustments to benefit levels, age thresholds, and digital administration, reflecting strong state ownership and adaptability. Evidence from prior studies highlights its positive social impact, including improved ability to meet basic needs and enhanced well-being among older recipients, reinforced by recent budget commitments that support both adequacy and long-term sustainability.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Nepal
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
The social pension began in 1994 (pilot announced for 75+) and was rolled out nationwide in 1995.
What was implemented?

Tonga operates a non‑contributory, government‑financed social pension aimed at providing basic income security for older persons who may not have access to contributory retirement schemes. This universal approach is especially important in the Pacific, where many older people worked in informal sectors such as farming or fishing and therefore lack contributory retirement savings. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

All citizens of Tonga aged 75 years or over

How was it developed and implemented?

Tonga’s social pension was developed as part of the government’s effort to introduce its first formal social benefit for elderly citizens. It was influenced by subregional policy trends to address the lack of social protection of the informal sector. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Universal social pensions are generally a good practice because they provide a predictable income source for older persons, particularly those who do not have access to contributory pensions. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Retirement Benefits Fund (NRBF)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Tonga
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The Vision Document on Ageing 2030, implemented by national and local Governments in Türkiye, was prepared to guide policies, programmes and services around ageing. The policies for older persons were categorised into six headings, including: active ageing, care economy, care services for older persons and quality of life, economics of ageing, rights of older persons and age friendly cities and local governments.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries were older persons in Turkey, along with persons with disabilities, their families, and communities engaged in intergenerational solidarity.

What were the results?

The programme reached thousands of older persons, promoting active ageing, reducing poverty risk, and expanding social inclusion through local care models and learning initiatives. For example, YADES supported municipalities in home/day care, directly improving well-being for vulnerable seniors (UN DESA, 2019 Voluntary National Review).

How was it developed and implemented?

Turkey’s Ministry of Family and Social Services, through the General Directorate for Persons with Disabilities and the Elderly, developed the 2020–2030 Aging Vision Document to guide policies on active ageing, care services, rights, and age-friendly environments. The framework was co-created with universities, NGOs, and local governments. Implementation included establishing 3rd Age Universities, expanding lifelong learning programs, enhancing home/day care via the YADES program, and integrating ageing into the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Coordination ensured evidence-based strategies supported healthy, dignified, and inclusive ageing.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is evidence-based, rights-focused, and participatory, fostering intergenerational solidarity and embedding ageing within national and global development agendas.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
N/A

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.