Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The Elderly School is a community-based programme promoting life-long learning.  Seniors meet once a week at a community center or local temple. The course has 4 modules: health, social, economic and environmental. The school is about promoting active ageing, keeping seniors out of the house and engaged socially.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons

What were the results?

A 2025 study found that those who attended the schools have a quality of life scores 10 points above those who do not. Seniors are more active as a result of attending the schools, and this leads to lower hospital visits and healthcare costs. Overall, there are more than 2000 schools nationwide with over 170,000 seniors studying both in person and online.

How was it developed and implemented?

The government created this programme after finding out that many Thais were suffering from social death, and were therefore lonely and depressed after retirement. This programme uses a self help model, as seniors are helping to run the school. After the success of the pilot, the government created a playbook so all villages in Thailand could start their own school.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme combats social isolation, and is a big tool to stopping elderly isolation, a precursor to dementia. As it uses community centers and temples, it is cost effective and cheap to run. Overall happiness and life satisfaction increased in seniors.

Supporting documents:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354846717_Lifelong_Learning_for_Senior_Citizens_in_Thailand

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Older Persons, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2017 ongoing
What was implemented?

This strategy is designed as a guide to help Nepal tailor their healthcare system specifically to the needs of an ageing population. There were three changes made, the first being creating a special room or wing for elderly over 60 so they are not placed in the general ward. These areas will be fit for elderly with non- slip floors, handrails, an lower beds. Secondly, there will be a second line for seniors in the hospital, they will have one desk that can handle all their needs from appointment making to pharmacy needs. Finally, there is a specialized bank account for the most sick seniors. If an elderly person has 1 of 8 specified diseases, the government will give them up to NPR 200,000 (approx. USD $1,500) in free care. Seniors over 85 get 100% free care.

Who were the beneficiaries?

all citizens of Nepal aged 60 years or over

How was it developed and implemented?

The Constitution of Nepal, Senior Citizens Act (2006), and various national policies—established obligations for senior citizens’ health and protection, motivating MoHP to draft a dedicated strategy. The MoHP formally decided to develop the Geriatric Health Service Strategy in recognition of the vulnerability and rights of senior citizens, based on evidence of unmet geriatric needs. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This strategy takes already existing facilities and adapting them to the needs of seniors. It puts limiting the financial strain on elderly as a top priority.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Health and Population
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Nepal
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Intergenerational Program for Older Persons and Children, named Intergen, was implemented by the local government in the Philippines to address critical problems of ageing, while allowing transfer of culture across generations. This programme, implemented nationwide, promotes productive and active lifestyles of older persons and helps them share their knowledge and skills to the younger generation, thus creating an intergenerational environment.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Both older persons and children in the community.

What were the results?

The “Apo Ko” storytelling initiative engages seniors in early childhood sessions, fostering empathy, respect, and intergenerational connection while promoting their empowerment and social participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme follows a structured process, beginning with consultations with Local Government Units and partners to formalise commitments through Memoranda of Understanding. Volunteers are then mobilised to contribute their time and skills, while both implementers and participants receive training to ensure readiness. Services are delivered to foster interaction between older persons and children, and progress is monitored and evaluated against plans and budgets to maintain accountability.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The programme integrates older and younger generations through structured, participatory activities that foster mutual support and knowledge exchange. It tackles ageing issues while promoting inclusive development, following a clear process from social preparation and training to monitoring and evaluation for sustainability. By engaging older persons in all stages—such as through the “Apo Ko...” storytelling initiative—it empowers seniors, honours their contributions, and strengthens intergenerational bonds.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local government
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The Law of Georgia on State Pensions establishes a state pension package guaranteed by the Constitution of Georgia, outlines entitlements and establishes a pension authority.  It is a universal pension, funded by the State Budget. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

All citizens of Georgia, as well as stateless persons with an official status on Georgia and foreign nationals who have legally resided in Georgia for the past 10 years by the time they apply for the pension are entitled to the pension. 

What were the results?

Georgia now provides virtually complete non‑contributory pension coverage, ensuring that almost all older people receive a basic income in old age. It therefore plays an important role for poverty reduction and especially provides access to pensions for women who are less likely to be covered by contributory pensions. However, while coverage is universal, the pension benefit level remains low relative to income needs.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Law of Georgia on State Pensions, adopted by Parliament in December 2005 and effective from January 2006, was developed to stabilize and modernize Georgia’s post‑independence pension system. It established a universal, non‑contributory pension funded by the state budget and grounded in constitutional principles such as human rights, equality, universality, and intergenerational solidarity. The law formalized administrative procedures for awarding and managing pensions and has been refined through multiple amendments since 2012. It formed the foundation for later pension reforms, including the introduction of complementary accumulative pension schemes from 2018 onward.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The law established a universal pension, funded by the Government; it also includes stateless persons legally residing in Georgia, as well as foreigners who resided for at least 10 years in Georgia. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Georgia
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Georgia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2006
What was implemented?

The Law on State Pensions of the Republic of Armenia governs the management and financing of state pension security, outlines the types of state pensions, as well as conditions and procedures for calculation and payment. It establishes principles such as providing pension entitlement irrespective of nationality, race, gender, language, religion, political views or social origin.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Armenia eligible to pensions, regardless of nationality

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides non-discriminatory access to pensions. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Armenia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2010
What was implemented?

The Law on the Elderly, adopted by the Parliament of Mongolia, aims to regulate the factors that determine the type and extent of social security services each senior citizen would receive, and to define the rights and duties of state and business entities and of organizations regarding these services. The new law ensures that older persons will recieve the following services: information and communication services, counseling services, mobile services, medical services during office hours, voluntary services, day care and nursing services and residential care services.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Mongolia, especially those with care needs, disabilities, or limited family support.

What were the results?

As of early 2020, residential care covered only 1.6% of older persons in need, and long-term care in Mongolia remained mostly informal, relying on untrained family caregivers. Most existing services were medically driven, with limited access to social and psychosocial support, and a lack of coordinated, cross-sectoral systems.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Law on the Elderly was developed through stakeholder consultations led by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection, with support from international agencies like ADB. It was implemented via legal enactment, training programmes for caregivers, and the establishment of community-based service centres.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It adopts a holistic, rights-based approach to ageing, integrates health and social services, and promotes community involvement, aligning with international best practices in long-term care.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Parliament of Mongolia
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Mongolia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Long-term Care Insurance Act, implemented by the Japanese Government and Ministry of Justice, aims to ensure the care of the elderly and to facilitate their daily life according to their special needs. For the Act, insurers shall be municipalities and special wards in themetropolital area, with the central government, prefctures, health care insurers and pension insurers providing continous support and assistance to them.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People aged 65 and older needing long‑term care, and those aged 40–64 with age‑related diseases, were eligible—regardless of income or family caregiving availability.

What were the results?

The programme supports over 5 million seniors aged 65+, about 17% of that age group, facilitating home‑ and facility‑based care while easing family burdens. Service use increased markedly, with formal services boosting support and reducing caregiver time (especially among higher‑income groups). Moreover, LTCI helped lower annual medical expenses for elderly people compared to pre‑implementation levels.

How was it developed and implemented?

The law passed in 1997, followed by a three‑year pilot, culminating in a mandatory social insurance system launched April 2000. Funded equally by taxes (central, prefectural, municipal) and insurance premiums from citizens aged 40+, municipalities act as insurers; beneficiaries pay only 10% copayment (adjusted to 20–30% for higher‑income groups later).

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It modernized elderly care by socializing caregiving, ensuring universal, equitable access, relieving family burden, and establishing evidence-based, sustainable financing structures.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Japan, Ministry of Justice
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
Enacted in 1997 and fully implemented in April 2000
What was implemented?

This is a practice was established under the Protection of the Rights of Elders Act No. 9 of 2000. The maintenance Board allows seniors to file claims against children who have neglected them. Taking a mediation approach, it acts as a community court, allowing for justice without the intimidation of going through the legal system. Seniors can fight for financial support or care from their adult children.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons of Sri Lanka, especially those at risk of neglect

What were the results?

A board meets frequently, around 50 times a year, and successfully resolve a significant number of cases. They close around 50% of cases through mediation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme follows a restorative justice model rather than waiting for a lawsuit. An elder can apply for a maintenance order against their children, a conciliation officer then meets with both parties to reach an agreement. If conciliation fails, the board holds a formal hearing. They then have the power to issue a legally binding Maintenance Order that requires children to pay a monthly allowance, which covers specific care such as food, shelter or clothing.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme ensures that ageing in place is financially possible for seniors without an independent income but who have children that can support them.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The National Secretariat for Elders
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Sri Lanka
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2000
What was implemented?

The 2024 Forum focused on “A Sustainable Pension System”, addressing challenges posed by an aging population, declining working-age population, and the sustainability of government funded defined benefit pension schemes. Discussions emphasized the life-cycle perspective on intergenerational resource flows, exploring how changing demographics affect pension sustainability, and policy measures to ensure adequate retirement income while maintaining fiscal balance.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers and government officials involved in retirement and social protection, public 

What were the results?

The Forum aimed to raise awareness, foster multi-stakeholder dialogue, and promote collaboration to secure the financial well-being of the country’s aging population, while emphasizing the need for balanced intergenerational resource sharing to ensure a sustainable and resilient pension system.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed in collaboration with Ministry of Social and Family Development, Ministry of Finance, Maldives Bureau of Statistics, UNFPA

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Developed in collaboration with Ministry of Social and Family Development, Ministry of Finance, Maldives Bureau of Statistics, UNFPA

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Partners included the Ministry of Social and Family Development, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, Auditor General's Office, Maldives Bureau of Statistics, UNFPA, BML, Dhiraagu, MCB and CBM
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection
Country:
Maldives
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The Moscow Longevity Project, implemented by the Mayor of Moscow, is the largest health, education and leisure project for older persons in Moscow. The initiative offers Muscovites the opportunity to participate in over 30 different activities, including classes aimed at improving physical and cognitive health, with online courses and video chats available for those who prefer to participate from home.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Beneficiaries are retirees in Moscow—women aged 55+, men aged 60+—regardless of employment status, focusing on enhancing their social inclusion, health, and active lifestyle opportunities.

What were the results?

As of 2025, the programme engaged over 660,000 older Muscovites in more than 141 Moscow Longevity Centres and many more self-organized clubs. It offers free cultural, educational, physical and recreational activities through a network of institutional and NGO partners. Participants have reported improved well‑being, social ties, and purposeful engagement.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Moscow Longevity programme was formally launched as a pilot on 1 March 2018 and scaled citywide in January 2019 through a mayoral decree. It involved city agencies, NGOs, and social service centers under an integrated governance framework.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Moscow Longevity Project is conceptualized as a systemic social intervention that addresses multiple dimensions of ageing, such as health, education, social inclusion, self-organization, and intergenerational cohesions - allowing for cumulative, reinforcing positive impacts. It transforms urban ageing through community-based, inclusive programming that promotes physical, cognitive, and social engagement using free, accessible services—fostering dignity and active citizenship in older age. The project explicitly contributes to changing public attitudes toward older age by reinforcing the value of active, capable, and socially engaged older people, which strengthens social cohesion across the city. Research (e.g. VTSIOM, 2025) on the social impacts of the Moscow Longevity Project shows improved quality of life, contribution to healthy life expectancy, increased self-realization and social participation, higher levels of financial, legal, and digital literacy, and the formation of a supportive communication environment for older citizens. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
mos.ru - Moscow Mayor and Moscow Government
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2018

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.