Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The Philippine Plan of Action for Senior Citizens (PPASC) 2023–2028 is a five‑year national framework that aims to build an inclusive, age‑friendly society by safeguarding the rights, health, and wellbeing of the country’s 9.22 million older persons while empowering them to remain active, productive members of their communities. It strengthens governance and coordination among agencies, promotes seniors’ civic participation and continued employment, enhances access to preventive and age‑responsive healthcare, and creates supportive environments aligned with the WHO age‑friendly cities framework across key domains such as transportation, housing, social inclusion, and community support services. The plan also supports policy reforms—including pension and retirement law amendments and stronger protections against elder abuse—to ensure financial security, dignity, and equal opportunities for Filipino seniors.

Who were the beneficiaries?

It is a clear action plan assigning responsibilities to Government entities and civil society. The eventual beneficiaries will be older persons in the Philippines. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The PPASC 2023–2028 was created through a collaborative, multi‑stakeholder process led by the National Commission of Senior Citizens (NCSC). It was developed in partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO) and key national government agencies, together with other development partners. The process included planning activities, workshops, briefings, and a national validation summit, which ensured technical input, inter‑agency alignment, and stakeholder validation at national level.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a plan with defined expected outcomes and actions. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Commission of Senior Citizens (NCSC)
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Comprehensive policy frameworks)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The Vietnam Pickleball Association (VPA) and Pickleball clubs at local levels organize regular Pickleball tournaments with 60+ age categories. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Viet Nam who want to stay active. 

What were the results?

Pickleball is becoming a very popular sport in Viet Nam in all age categories. Tournaments encourage seniors to stay active. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Pickleball is a sport that is friendly for older persons because it is a low impact but effective exercise. It encourages muscle engagement in legs, core, shoulders and arms and improves balance and coordination, thus supports fall prevention. It can also support intergenerational interaction. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Vietnam Pickleball Association
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing)
Country:
Viet Nam
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2024 (starting)
What was implemented?

Busan Metropolitan City implemented an enhanced comprehensive heat wave response plan for the official heat wave period (May 15–September 30), ahead of the Korea Meteorological Administration's new three-tier advisory system (advisory, warning, severe heat wave warning) plus a tropical night advisory, effective June 1 2026. The plan has four pillars. First, strengthening situation management: a new mobile situation room and an emergency-room surveillance system for heat-related illnesses, coordinated across the city, district/county governments, education office, and labor authorities. Second, protecting vulnerable groups: welfare workers checking roughly 32,000 at-risk seniors every other day (daily or twice-daily during severe warnings), plus five basic safety rules distributed to heat-vulnerable workplaces (313 sites), covering water, cooling equipment, rest breaks, cooling gear, and emergency reporting. Third, expanding heat shelters: 1,500 cooling shelters and 4,200 heat reduction facilities inspected and operating, funded by KRW 1.9 billion, plus expanded subway and bus shelters, additional shade structures, cooling fog systems, and partnerships with KT (135 branches) and BNK Busan Bank (196 branches) as neighborhood cooling spaces. Fourth, reinforced safety oversight for outdoor festivals, from pre-event inspections through real-time on-site monitoring, alongside the "Busan Safety ON" platform for integrated heat information.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Busan city. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Busan developed the plan in response to the Korea Meteorological Administration's revised three-tier heat wave advisory system, set to take effect June 1, prompting the city to upgrade from a two-tier structure. The city proactively allocated funding early,  KRW 1 billion in heat wave response funds and KRW 900 million in special adjustment grants to district and county governments in February and May,  to prepare shelters and facilities ahead of summer. Implementation involved multiple stakeholders: city departments, all 16 district/county governments, the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Office, the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, police, fire authorities, and private partners (KT, BNK Busan Bank). Facilities (1,500 shelters, 4,200 heat reduction structures) were fully inspected in April before activation.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This is a good practice because it combines proactive, multi-tiered coordination (government agencies, private companies, and community workers) with early funding allocation and facility inspections completed before peak summer, ensuring readiness rather than reactive response. It is innovative in its public-private partnerships, such as converting KT and BNK Busan Bank branches into cooling shelters, and its use of a digital platform ("Busan Safety ON") for real-time heat information. Its structured, replicable framework, covering situation management, vulnerable group protection, shelter expansion, and event safety, makes it adaptable for other cities facing similar climate risks.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Busan Metropolitan Government
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters, Climate change)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2026
What was implemented?

Directive No.20 is about the Policy and Mechanism related to the national disaster management and relief activities. The main purpose of the directive is to create systematic coordination among agencies involve in disaster management as well as relief and rehabilitation activities. This includes protection and care of older adults.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The whole population of Malaysia, including vulnerable groups such as older persons

What were the results?

The directive provides clear guidelines on the management of disasters, including the responsibilities and functions of various agencies involved. It also emphasizes the need for an integrated disaster management system to effectively handle disasters on land. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of NSC Directive No. 20 involved a collaborative effort among various agencies and stakeholders in Malaysia. The directive aimed to establish a systematic and integrated disaster management and relief mechanism to handle disasters effectively. It was developed to reduce casualties and minimize damage to properties and the environment, and to ensure effective coordination among agencies involved in disaster management and relief activities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The directive covers total disaster risk management, increases in complexity, engagement of private, NGO, and community involvement, and consideration of international treaties.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Government of Malaysia
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1997
What was implemented?

Local housing developers are involved in several development to cater for the hoousing needs of older Malaysians.  Several  of such housing developments for seniors have emerged in Malaysia in the last decade. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Malaysia

What were the results?

These initiatives have created safer and more inclusive living environments for seniors, enabling them to maintain independence while staying close to family. They have improved access to healthcare, reduced risks of accidents through thoughtful design, and promoted active ageing through community activities and recreational spaces. Retirement villages such as Green Acres and Eden-on-the-Park have provided seniors with opportunities for social engagement and healthy living, reflecting a growing trend toward independent and active lifestyles among older Malaysians.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developers conducted research on seniors’ daily needs and incorporated universal design principles into homes and townships. Implementation involved strategic planning to include healthcare facilities, safe pedestrian pathways, ramps, and community spaces. Projects like Sunway City, Bandar Bukit Raja, and Gamuda Cove were designed to integrate accessibility with lifestyle amenities, while retirement villages were established to offer independent living with optional care services.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This approach addresses the evolving needs of seniors by promoting ageing in place within inclusive communities. It combines safety, accessibility, and social engagement, ensuring older persons can live independently while maintaining a high quality of life.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Private developers
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The Joint Programme "Bridging the Digital Health Divide" in Kyrgyzstan includes older persons and pensioners, alongside women, children, and persons with disabilities. For this population, the relevant interventions were the digitalization of disability certification (removing the need for older or mobility-limited individuals to travel repeatedly to submit paperwork) and the broader integration of the national Digital Health Information System (d-HIS) into a unified Digital Health Profile, giving all 7.1 million citizens, including the elderly, centralized, seamless access to their own health records, lab results, and immunization history without needing to navigate multiple disconnected systems.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People living in remote and mountainous areas, rural health care workers, women and girls (including pregnant women), children, people with disabilities (including children), adolescents and youth. Efforts will be made to ensure that at least 60% of beneficiaries are women and girls, recognizing their often-disproportionate barriers to healthcare access.

What were the results?

The Programme targets at least 120,000 people with disabilities (including older persons) receiving digital disability certificates nationwide, alongside a targeted 20% increase in patients accessing their medical data through the Digital Health Profile. For older citizens, the pilot electronic submission system for disability documentation in Bishkek had already processed roughly 2,000 documents between June 2023 and March 2024. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The implementation plan and structural logic were discussed and finalized with national partners, including the Ministry of Health and the e-Health Centre, considering national priorities and local needs.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Kyrgyzstan in collaboration with UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Kyrgyzstan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2023-2027
What was implemented?

Introduced under Article 16.1 of the Labour Code, this law prohibits discrimination in employment, including on the grounds of age. It establishes equal treatment in recruitment, working conditions, remuneration, promotion, and termination of employment. Implemented at the national level, the policy applies to all workers and employers and aims to prevent age-based exclusion and unfair labour practices, thereby supporting equal opportunities and inclusive labour markets.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Vulnerable groups, particularly those at risk of being discriminated, including older persons

How was it developed and implemented?

Non-discrimination in employment in Azerbaijan is grounded in the country’s legal and institutional framework. Article 16 of the Labour Code expressly prohibits discrimination in labour relations during hiring, changes in employment, and termination on grounds such as citizenship, sex, race, nationality, language, place of residence, social origin, age, family circumstances, religion, political views, trade union membership, or other factors unrelated to professional qualifications and job performance. Employers are barred from directly or indirectly limiting rights or establishing privileges based on these prohibited grounds. Legal protections are reinforced through the Law on Employment, which guarantees equal opportunities to exercise the right to free choice of job and employment irrespective of personal characteristics. Persons who believe they have faced discrimination may seek recourse in courts under the Labour Code.  

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The non-discrimination provisions in Azerbaijan’s labour framework are a good practice because they codify clear legal prohibitions against discrimination across multiple grounds in employment relations, linking them to both the Labour Code and the Law on Employment. This provides a comprehensive legal basis for equal treatment in hiring, conditions of work, and termination. The model is replicable, as the legal norms align with international standards (including ILO Convention 111 on discrimination in employment) and can be adopted or strengthened in other legal systems. It is sustainable insofar as the rights are enforceable through the judicial system, offering legal remedies to individuals who experience discrimination in employment.  

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Azerbaijan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Azerbaijan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1999
What was implemented?

A presidential decree aiming to protect older persons at retirement age from being terminated contracts.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons at retirement age

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed by the government of Uzbekistan as a presidential decree and implemented by relevant state bodies responsible for drafting/adjusting labour rules and applying them nationally.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It supports older persons by addressing age discrimination through retirement age as an automatic grounds for dismissal, thus protecting older persons right, income and social participation.

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/3192

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Uzbekistan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Uzbekistan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

In the Kurgan region a third of the population are pensioners and nine per cent persons with disabilities. Many of them live in rural areas with limited access to specialized facilities and services such as psychologists, urologists, neurologists, cardiologists, and others. Families with elderly people with disabilities also lack psychological or legal support. At best, only the economic challenges of old age are addressed, while the complex issues of self-identity, leisure activities, and intergenerational relationships remain unaddressed. To improve access to services and social interaction, the project organized consultations for older persons and their families with professionals in medicine, psychology, and law. Also, active social activities were organized and target groups were taught healthy lifestyle skills.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Senior citizens aged 55 years and over and their care givers living in rural areas of the Kurgan region.

What were the results?

The "Hello!" project reached over 800 people and 24 municipalities in the Trans-Urals region.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It targeted rural areas where older people and their caregivers often face isolation and limited access to specialized services. The project supported older adults by strengthening their physical, emotional, intellectual, and creative capacities, building social connections, promoting healthy‑lifestyle literacy and awareness of pensioners’ rights, and reinforcing their social participation. It also stimulated volunteer engagement among older people and fostered a sense of community. For organizers, it provided an opportunity to further develop their professional skills.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments; Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2017-2018
What was implemented?

This programme seeks to improve the quality of life and well-being of isolated older persons through establishing sustainable and holistic home care services in Armenia. The establishment of high-quality home care services includes qualification and professionalization of employees in nursing services and development and testing of a monitoring and evaluation mechanism for the service, as well as outlining its financing mechanisms. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Socially vulnerable people with home care needs in in Gyumri & Vanadzor (Armenia), including persons over 65 years of age.

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed through partners with Governments and faith-based organizations. To ensure long‑term sustainability, the project developed specialized gerontology and geriatrics training modules, approved by the Ministry of Health, partnered with vocational schools to train 120 nursing students and provides qualification training for 30 active nurses.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The project promotes a community-based care model, with adequate training and oversight.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Caritas Germany in collaboration with the Ministry of Labor and Social affairs of the Republic of Armenia and grants from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Armenia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2025-2027

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.