Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The “Walk in My Shoes” campaign by HelpAge India is an annual initiative launched on World Elder Abuse Awareness Day to address ageism and strengthen intergenerational bonds. The campaign focuses on raising awareness about elder abuse and social isolation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older and younger people in India are beneficiaries benefitting of a changed image of older persons. 

What were the results?

It has  raised awareness, generated nationwide participation, and released research reports on intergenerational dynamics, promoting respect and inclusion for older persons.

How was it developed and implemented?

The “Walk in My Shoes” campaign by HelpAge India was developed as a response to growing concerns about elder abuse, neglect, and ageism. To address these issues, HelpAge India conceptualized the campaign around empathy-building, encouraging younger generations to “see life through the eyes of elders.” Findings from national studies on elder abuse and intergenerational gaps informed the campaign’s core message.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The campaign tackles ageism and elder abuse through an empathy-driven, intergenerational approach. It combines research-based advocacy with engaging activities that encourage youth to understand the experiences of older persons, fostering respect and inclusion.

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
HelpAge India
Categories:
Data and research; Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect, Combatting ageism)
Country:
India
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

The “While you were small, we grow” project in Izmir, Türkiye, was implemented by a doctoral student from the Department of Internal Medicine Elderly Health. This initiative brought together older persons and high school students to teach each other traditional and modern games, correspondingly breaking down generational barriers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

older adults (aged 60+) enrolled in the University of the Third Age (Tazelenme Üniversitesi) at Ege University, and high school students from several technical high schools in İzmir.

What were the results?

In nine months, the programme more than doubled in scale, fostering intergenerational connection and cultural exchange through monthly high school game sessions.

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was conceptualized by PhD candidate Buğçe Kamer Baybaş from the Department of Internal Medicine’s Gerontology group at Ege University. Inspired by intergenerational values and the Turkish National Ageing Action Plan (2007), she collaborated with teacher Ülker Orhan to bring the idea to life. Initially piloted with a small intergenerational group, the project quickly scaled when Baybaş encountered the Ortak Değerler Hareketi (Shared Values Movement) and received support through its support program. Participants were then selected from multiple schools and Tazelenme University, and they met monthly across different high school venues over a nine-month period.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The project used play as a universal bridge to connect older and younger generations, fostering mutual respect, empathy, and cultural exchange. Elders shared traditional folk games while youth introduced contemporary ones, creating a holistic value exchange that evolved from a 3-month pilot into a 9-month programme with a public festival. Rooted in community and backed by institutions like Ege University and Ortak Değerler Hareketi, the scalable model broke down age stereotypes, gained public recognition, and demonstrated potential for replication in other communities.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ege University
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

A WHO Collaborating Centre on geriatrics and care for older people was set up at the Russian Clinical and Research Centre of Gerontology of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (supported by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation) to promote integrated primary and long‑term care, design and test innovative care models, support training, and advocate for/evaluate healthy‑ageing policies. The Centre's mission aligns with the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing and aims to strengthen evidence‑based approaches and scale models for ageing populations.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries are older people in the Russian Federation and neighbouring countries through better integrated care and long‑term care. Secondary beneficiaries include health and social‑care professionals who receive training and guidance, and policymakers who gain evidence‑informed analyses and recommendations to adapt systems to demographic change.

What were the results?

Early outcomes are system‑level: the Centre is mandated to exchange and disseminate information on geriatric services and long‑term care, assess country progress and barriers, prepare policy reviews, and develop educational programmes for health and social‑care workers. At national level, the Ministry highlights an existing three‑tier geriatric infrastructure (regional centres, outpatient offices, beds) that provides the operational base for Centre‑supported improvements.

How was it developed and implemented?

Designation followed multi‑year groundwork at RCRCG: research on ageing, creation of a biobank of long‑livers, development of clinical and organizational solutions, and an education pipeline for specialists. WHO/Europe’s designation formalized this role and positioned the centre within the WHO CC network to share data, co‑develop policies, and train practitioners across the Russian Federation and the wider region.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It couples a national centre of excellence (RCRCG) with WHO’s collaborating‑centre framework, ensuring replicability, policy relevance, and regional reach. The model integrates research, clinical practice, training, and policy support, directly addressing rapid population ageing and aligning with global healthy‑ageing agendas. Clear terms of reference (innovation in care models, training, policy evaluation) and an established national geriatrics infrastructure increase feasibility and potential impact.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
WHO Collaborating Centre operates at the Russian Clinical and Research Centre of Gerontology (RCRCG), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University.
Categories:
Data and research; Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care); Implementation and follow-up (Monitoring framework)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

The Work Bonus, implemented by the Department of Social Services, is an Australian initiative that aims to support and reward older persons over ’AgePension’ age. This bonus was implemented to incentivise older persons to continue to work as it allows them to keep more of their pension, whilst earning income fron work, allowing them to earn up to $300 every two weeks.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The programme benefits Age Pensioners and eligible seniors, particularly those who are still working. It allows them to earn income from employment or self-employment without reducing their pension entitlement.

What were the results?

The scheme substantially improved income retention for older Australians by excluding a portion of their work income from the pension income test and allowing accumulation of unused credits. As of 2023, the Work Bonus balance cap increased to $11,800—allowing seniors to earn more without impact to their pension, thereby enhancing financial autonomy and workforce inclusion.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Work Bonus was developed by the Department of Social Services to support workforce participation among older Australians. It is administered by Services Australia, with automatic income concessions applied through pension assessments.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides a clear, flexible financial incentive that aligns work and pension policy—empowering older individuals to stay engaged in the workforce without financial penalty, while minimizing administrative complexity.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Social Services
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2009
What was implemented?

The ’Working in Aged Care’ in New Zealand, implemented by the Government, Ministry of Business and Innovation and Employment, is a guidebook to help individuals who want to work in the aged sector as support workers, caregivers or health care professionals. The guide helps individuals understand the sector and where to find advice and support if needed.

Who were the beneficiaries?

New migrant aged‑care workers—especially from the Philippines, Pacific nations (Tonga, Samoa, Fiji, Kiribati, Tuvalu), India, and China—as well as their employers in New Zealand’s aged care sector.

What were the results?

New migrant aged‑care workers—especially from the Philippines, Pacific nations (Tonga, Samoa, Fiji, Kiribati, Tuvalu), India, and China—as well as their employers in New Zealand’s aged care sector.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Settlement Unit, MBIE, and sector stakeholders co-developed the guides, which were disseminated through Settlement Information, local communications, and included with visa application materials to reach both migrants and employers effectively.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It proactively addresses both migrant and employer needs with clear, practical guidance—fostering smoother integration, workplace harmony, and improved service delivery.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of New Zealand, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2014
What was implemented?

The Young Happy initiative is a social platform dedicated to improving the quality of life for older adults by fostering happiness, independence, and active engagement. It offers both online and offline activities, educational programs, and opportunities for volunteering and social interaction, aiming to transform aging into a positive and empowering experience. Through partnerships and community-building, Young Happy promotes lifelong learning, meaningful connections, and a sense of purpose for seniors, helping them stay active and valued in society.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Thailand and their families who participate in the initiative

What were the results?

Over 50,000 members actively participate in YoungHappy initiatives which led to increasing their digital literacy and social connections. 

How was it developed and implemented?

YoungHappy was founded when its CEO and co‑founder, Charkhris “Gap” Phomyoth, witnessed firsthand the loneliness and lack of purpose experienced by his own retired parents. Recognizing that retirement often led to depression, social isolation, and missed opportunities for lifelong learning, he was inspired to combine his personal motivation with the principles of social business to build a platform that empowers seniors. They launched YoungHappy in 2017–2018 in Bangkok as a hybrid online and offline community—offering activities, tech training, peer engagement, and volunteer opportunities—to help older adults stay active, valued, technologically connected, and socially engaged.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The project supports human-centered innovation. It directly increases older persons digital literacy, promotes intergenerational support and empowers older persons to stay active. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Young Happy, Social enterprise
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

Although the country lacks a formal pension system for older persons, youSave has emerged as a practical and scalable solution that helps older adults—especially those in the informal economy—prepare financially for old age. In a country with a large informal sector, the youSave program was specifically created to help self‑employed and informal workers open retirement savings accounts.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Informal sector workers in Solomon Islands

What were the results?

The youSave program enabled self‑employed and informal‑sector workers—including many older adults—to open voluntary retirement savings accounts for the first time.

How was it developed and implemented?

youSave was developed as part of a broader government strategy to expand access to financial services, especially in remote areas where older persons struggle to reach banks. The National Financial Inclusion Strategy supported the programme. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

In the absence of a comprehensive pension scheme it allows access to basic income security to those in the informal sector and promotes financial inclusion. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Central Bank of Solomon Islands with National Provident Fund
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Solomon Islands
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2017
What was implemented?

The Life Apartments are an elderly-oriented, comprehensive community that adopted the concept of Life Apartments from the Netherlands for healthy and comfortable aging. The complex offers medical services, such as nursing and rehabilitation, as well as social spaces, like restaurants and daily activity programs. Visitors from outside are welcome to promote open spaces where people of all ages can interact.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older adults, particularly retired seniors, who need a supportive living environment.

What were the results?

The most recent data shows that 11 life apartments have been built nationwide in China, serving over 5,000 senior residents. Residents of these apartments reported increased satisfaction and greater involvement in social activities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Jiangsu Yunlin Elderly Care Group built the Life Apartment project based on the "happy retired life" philosophy of Dutch life apartment projects. The apartments are equipped with smart technology. These include smart sensors and emergency alarms, as well as an online platform where senior residents can easily access community activities and earn points on their "time banks" that can be exchanged for other services.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The living concept integrates into society by providing spaces for different generations and giving older adults easier access to medical services and social activities. It also sets a positive example for adapting projects from different cultural backgrounds to local contexts.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Jiangsu Yunlin Elderly Care Group
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2016
What was implemented?

The foundation implemented a comprehensive, multi‑level system of support for older people and people with disabilities, aimed at improving their quality of life and ensuring dignity in old age. Its activities include addressing basic needs, providing care, ensuring access to medical and social support, organizing meaningful communication and leisure, and improving living conditions in residential care institutions and for older people living at home. Over time, the foundation’s work evolved from direct assistance into a broader effort to help build sustainable systems of long‑term care and social support in the Russian Federation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are older people and people with disabilities, including residents of nursing homes and residential social institutions; as well as older people living alone or at home who require support due to limited mobility or health conditions. Secondary beneficiaries include families of older people, volunteers, and local communities involved in care and support activities. The foundation’s work covers hundreds of residential care institutions and reaches beneficiaries across many regions of the Russian Federation.

What were the results?

As a result of the foundation’s work hundreds of residential institutions across the Russian Federation receive ongoing support. Thousands of older people benefit from improved care, better living conditions, medical and hygiene support, and regular communication. Older people experience reduced isolation and improved emotional wellbeing through contact with volunteers and participation in social activities. Also, public awareness of the challenges of ageing and long‑term care has increased, helping to shift societal attitudes toward greater respect, solidarity, and responsibility for older generations.

How was it developed and implemented?

The foundation developed its activities from a volunteer movement launched in 2007 into a registered charitable foundation in 2011, combining grassroots engagement with institutional capacity. Implementation relies on direct targeted assistance in institutions and at home; engagement, training, and coordination of volunteers; cooperation with state authorities, businesses, and non‑governmental organizations; and development of methodological and educational materials, including training programmes for long‑term care and social service professionals. This combination allows the foundation to address immediate needs while also contributing to long‑term systemic improvements in older persons' care.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The foundation’s work integrates direct care, emotional support, and systemic change within one model; places human dignity, communication, and meaningful social connection at the center of older persons' care; combines volunteerism with professional expertise and institutional partnerships; operates at scale while maintaining individual, needs‑based support; and contributes to the development of long‑term care approaches that can be replicated by public institutions and other organizations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
charitable foundation "Starost v Radost" ("Old age is a joy")
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Participation of older persons, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2007
What was implemented?

A residents-only digital citizen portal that uses the My Number Card to provide dementia prevention, health promotion, and learning services through a unified digital ID.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Local residents of Miyakonojo City, especially older adults at risk of dementia.

What were the results?

Within one month of launch, over 200 residents across multiple age groups registered and used the services, demonstrating cross-generational adoption and strong local engagement.

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed using a national smart city data integration framework, linking services to the My Number Card and issuing a city-specific digital ID (“Miyakonojo ID”) for access via smartphones.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It demonstrates how a government-backed digital ID platform can deliver personalized, preventive health services at the local level while remaining scalable nationwide.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Miyakonojo City Government through the Miyakonojo Smart City Promotion Council.
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.