Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The Seniors University of China (SUC) is a national educational initiative that offers structured learning opportunities for seniors. Officially established in March 2023 under the Open University of China, the SUC is the nation's first university exclusively for older learners. The SUC offers a diverse portfolio of educational programs, including skills training, cultural heritage courses, social services learning, opportunities to participate in scientific research, and international exchange programs. The university integrates online and offline courses to make lifelong learning accessible and flexible for seniors nationwide.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older adults aged 50 and above are eligible to register.

What were the results?

With approximately 22 million seniors enrolled nationwide, SUC operates 55,000 grassroots learning centers and offers 436,000 online courses as of April 2024. 

How was it developed and implemented?

It was implemented by a national framework coordinated through government policy, institutional guidance, digital infrastructure, and community-based learning networks. Established under the guidance of the Ministry of Education and operated by the Open University of China, SUC was embedded within China’s broader strategy to build a lifelong learning system and learning society. The blended approach ensured accessibility for seniors with different educational backgrounds and digital abilities. The courses are subsidized by the government and are either free or low-cost.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This learning programme encourages lifelong learning for older adults, empowering them to remain active learners and participants in their communities. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Open University of China in collaboration with Government
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Sewing Lab for Older Persons established age-friendly sewing lab services for older persons. The iniative provides dedicated community spaces where older persons can access sewing facilities and participate in age-friendly activities aimed at promoting inclusion and engagement 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons, particularly those at risk of social isolation

What were the results?

Two sewing labs have been created in Nor Nork and Hrazdan as a social enterprise.

How was it developed and implemented?

Implemented as a national policy through government decree and NGO partnership with training and workshops. Specifically involving the establishment of local sewing labs as well as the delivery of sewing training and workshops for older persons

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Combines participation, skills and inclusion in a low‑cost, replicable model

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/47              

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Armenia in partnership with Mission Armenia
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Armenia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Sex Discrimination Act, implemented by the Australian Government, prohiits discrimination in work, education, acess to goods and services and other areas on the grounds of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and so on.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Women and all groups facing discrimination on the basis of sex, marital status, pregnancy, family responsibilities—and later, sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex status.

What were the results?

The Act made sexual harassment unlawful, created the office of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner, and improved women’s access to education and employment. The Act encouraged more women to seek education and employment, raised family incomes, and enabled women—including single mothers—to combine work and family life.

How was it developed and implemented?

Introduced by Senator Susan Ryan, debated in the Senate, and passed in 1984 with transitional exemptions for institutions such as churches, the military, and insurance.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It pioneered comprehensive protection against sex and gender-based discrimination, established enforcement through a Commissioner, and laid an enduring institutional foundation for gender equality in Australia.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1984
What was implemented?

This smartphone application is part of a "Social Participation Initiative" that encourages elderly individuals to become more involved in community activities, such as joining local groups or volunteering. The app uses data on the number of steps taken, locations visited, and days spent outside to evaluate users' social participation. Companies and organizations also benefit from collaborating with the app because it provides access to valuable activity data on the elderly.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older adults

What were the results?

A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of using the app on social participation among study participants aged over 60. The study found that app users demonstrated a significantly higher level of social engagement in hobbies and club activities compared to non-users.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme's foundation is rooted in the findings of the Japan Agency for Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES), which indicates that a community health promotion strategy emphasizing social interaction among older individuals effectively mitigates the risk of disability. Hitachi is also seeking to collaborate with other companies to further develop the app, as well as to establish partnerships with businesses and local authorities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The app has been shown to have a positive impact on the social participation of older adults. Additionally, the data collected by the app benefits various business sectors by offering insights into the elderly population.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Hitachi Ltd. in collaboration with local governments
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

Two different housing concepts have been implemented in Busanjin-gu, Busan: the Doran-doran House and the Ieum House. These projects were developed for individuals who are capable of independent living but still require care and partial welfare services. The Doran-doran House project is Korea’s first shared public rental housing complex designed exclusively for older adults. The latter is a remodelled housing project for the elderly. Residents of this house are connected with a local social worker who provides ongoing support through regular home visits. This is considered to be closer and more direct care than that provided by the first project.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Individuals over the age of 65 who need support but wish to remain in their place of residence.

What were the results?

Despite some issues arising from living closely together, the residents of the two houses reported an improvement in their living conditions compared to before, in terms of both facilities and feelings of loneliness.

How was it developed and implemented?

Senior Shared Housing was promoted as part of the 2019 Community-Based Integrated Care Pilot Project run by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Busanjin-gu launched an integrated elderly care project including this housing initiative, which is funded by national, city and district budgets.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The housing project showcases how different concepts of living together in old age could be realised to support and improve the lives of many older people.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local government authority of Busanjin-gu
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
Two different housing concepts have been implemented in Busanjin-gu, Busan: the Doran-doran House and the Ieum House. These projects were developed for individuals who are capable of independent living but still require care and partial welfare services.
What was implemented?

Silver Age Action in China, implemented by the Chinese Government and the National Working Committee on Ageing, is a nationwide volunteer programme for retired professionals and intellectuals to support underdeveloped areas. The programme, which had engaged 5 million older volunteers by 2013, had benefited 300 million people and contributed over US$ 1.2 billion. The National Health Comission has further launched multiple projects to encourage retired medical professionals to improve rural healthcare.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries were older adults and residents in underdeveloped areas of China. At the same time, retired professionals also benefited by gaining opportunities to stay active, contribute to society, and improve their well-being through meaningful engagement.

What were the results?

The programme mobilized over 7 million senior volunteers across China by 2024, delivering 4,000+ community projects and benefiting 400 million people, while enhancing participants’ well-being and generating ¥8 billion (US $1.2 billion) in social value.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Silver Age Action Plan was launched by the Chinese government in 2003 and coordinated by the National Working Commission on Aging. It mobilized retired professionals through provincial and local programs, with funding from government budgets. Implementation involved partnerships with local governments, community organizations, and public institutions, allowing volunteers to serve in healthcare, education, agriculture, and public services across rural and urban areas.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Silver Age Action Plan is considered a good practice because it combines active aging with community development, mobilizing millions of retirees to address social service gaps in underdeveloped areas. It demonstrates strong government coordination, broad societal participation, and measurable impact—benefiting both service recipients and older volunteers. The program’s adaptability and 2024 renewal further highlight its sustainability and relevance in addressing population aging.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Chinese Government, National Working Committee on Aging
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2003
What was implemented?

The Silver DOST Project in Azerbaijan, implemented by the Agency for Sustainable and Operational Social Provision and Ministry of Labor and Social Protection, is a sub-programme of the DOST Volunteer Project. This project promotes an active lifestyle for older persons through volunteer activities, encouraging them to spend their leisure time productively. This project simultaneously promotes intergenerational relations by encouraging young community members to volunteer.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Retirees aged 50 and above who wished to remain active and contribute through volunteering at DOST centers.

What were the results?

Since its launch, the “Volunteer DOST” program—including Silver DOST—has involved over 5,200 volunteers (as of mid-2022), enabling retirees to engage in public service, gain new skills, and enrich their leisure time while supporting frontline social services.

How was it developed and implemented?

Under the DOST Agency, established in 2019, the “Volunteer DOST” initiative introduced three subprograms in late 2019: “Young DOST,” “Silver DOST,” and “Distant DOST”. Volunteer performance is evaluated through observation, feedback, and appreciation letters.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It empowers active ageing by integrating retirees into voluntary public service roles, enhancing their social engagement and sense of purpose while strengthening intergenerational collaboration and public service delivery.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Agency for Sustainable and Operational Social Provision, Ministry of Labor and Social Protection
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Azerbaijan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

Approved by the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan on April 22, 2021, the Roadmap for the Development of Volunteering seeks to promote volunteerism among older adults through the "Silver Volunteering" initiative. This program aims to engage senior citizens in volunteer activities, leveraging their knowledge and experience to actively contribute to the country's social life, while offering The initiative is supported by the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of Kazakhstan, with grant funding from the NAO "Center for Civil Initiatives". Each of the 17 regions has its own local project coordinator to ensure effective implementation. "Silver Volunteering" is targeted at individuals aged 50 and above across all regions of Kazakhstan. It aims to foster their involvement in social activities, volunteer projects, and charitable events. Participants can join the program by completing online forms, with assistance available for those needing help with digital tools. The project provides training in media literacy, organizes outdoor activities, sports, eco-events, and other community-based initiatives.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Kazakhstan

What were the results?

By 2021, nearly 800 older adults from all over Kazakhstan had joined the program. The roadmap was approved in April 2021 and is set for implementation through 20

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It promotes the participation of older persons. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of Kazakhstan
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Skills and Employment Skills training, under the Skills Checkpoint Programme, was implemented by the Department of Education. This incentive asissts older persons in Australia to develop skills in their careers to remain productive and thus be kept in the workforce for longer, providing citizens aged 45-70 with up to $2,200 to fund suitable training.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The program targets mature workers aged 45 and above within Victoria—particularly those in employment at risk, recently unemployed, or seeking to transition into new roles or careers. It supports both individuals and their employers.

What were the results?

Since November 2018, BUSY At Work has supported over 7,000 participants across multiple states, helping mature-aged workers access career guidance, create tailored career plans, and pursue upskilling or career transitions with funding of up to AUD 2,200 toward eligible training.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Australian Government’s Department of Education, Skills and Employment designed the free program; it is delivered via contracted organizations like BUSY At Work. Participants undergo personalised assessments followed by one-on-one career advice and training recommendations, with co-funded training accessible through the Skills and Training Incentive.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It offers flexible, evidence-based support that enables mature workers to remain productive—combining career advisory services, training funding, and a tailored, participant-centric model for lifelong employability.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Education
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The SkillsFuture Mid-Career Enhanced Subsidy, implemented by the Government of Singapore, aims to provide additional subsidies to Singaporean citizend aged 40 and above to encourage upskilling and reskilling to adapt to changing job requirements. This subsidy regonised that mid-career Singaporeans may face greater challenges in undertaking training, offering up to 90% of course fees for varous course types.

Who were the beneficiaries?

This initiative benefits all Singaporeans aged 25 and above, including students, early-career individuals, mid-career workers, and senior professionals—along with employers, training providers, and unions.

What were the results?

In 2023, approximately 520,000 individuals participated in SSG-supported training—200,000 of whom were mid-career workers using enhanced subsidies. Employers also stepped up: 23,000 organizations supported around 228,000 employees in training.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed through collaboration among SSG, Workforce Singapore, industry partners, and unions, SkillsFuture rolled out via SkillsFuture Credit, targeted subsidies (e.g., Mid-Career Enhanced Subsidy), and employer incentives. Implementation uses digital platforms (MySkillsFuture), training partnerships, and major public campaigns.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

SkillsFuture integrates inclusive lifelong learning with data-driven, scalable delivery—ensuring broad participation across life stages while aligning skills development with evolving industry needs.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Singapore
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2015

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.