Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The Vietnam Pickleball Association (VPA) and Pickleball clubs at local levels organize regular Pickleball tournaments with 60+ age categories. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Viet Nam who want to stay active. 

What were the results?

Pickleball is becoming a very popular sport in Viet Nam in all age categories. Tournaments encourage seniors to stay active. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Pickleball is a sport that is friendly for older persons because it is a low impact but effective exercise. It encourages muscle engagement in legs, core, shoulders and arms and improves balance and coordination, thus supports fall prevention. It can also support intergenerational interaction. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Vietnam Pickleball Association
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing)
Country:
Viet Nam
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2024 (starting)
What was implemented?

Directive No.20 is about the Policy and Mechanism related to the national disaster management and relief activities. The main purpose of the directive is to create systematic coordination among agencies involve in disaster management as well as relief and rehabilitation activities. This includes protection and care of older adults.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The whole population of Malaysia, including vulnerable groups such as older persons

What were the results?

The directive provides clear guidelines on the management of disasters, including the responsibilities and functions of various agencies involved. It also emphasizes the need for an integrated disaster management system to effectively handle disasters on land. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of NSC Directive No. 20 involved a collaborative effort among various agencies and stakeholders in Malaysia. The directive aimed to establish a systematic and integrated disaster management and relief mechanism to handle disasters effectively. It was developed to reduce casualties and minimize damage to properties and the environment, and to ensure effective coordination among agencies involved in disaster management and relief activities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The directive covers total disaster risk management, increases in complexity, engagement of private, NGO, and community involvement, and consideration of international treaties.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Government of Malaysia
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1997
What was implemented?

The Pre-Retirement Awareness Programme is an initiative that is designed to prepare the workforce for the transition into retirement. The main pillars are; psychological preparedness, financial literacy, health and wellness, and social connectivity.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People in pre-retirement age

What were the results?

The National Secretariat for Elders reported on an increased financial security and literacy. The Employee Provident Fund found that participants who attended the pre-retirement seminars were less likely to burn through their retirement savings in the first three years. Additionally, they are trained to identify financial predators and scams. Participants have a higher healthy living score, and are more proactive in managing non-communicable diseases. The programme also encourages new retirees to join rural elders communities earlier as they are more aware of their benefits.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme was implemented using a life-cycle approach, with the National Secretariat for Elders realizing that 60 is too late to make large changes in life-style and financial preparation. Therefore, a programme was started to increase awareness on the need to prepare for ageing and equip people with knowledge on retirement. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice promotes resilience among seniors. It is proactive by addressing financial and mental health before people reach retirement, therefore reducing the burden on public healthcare systems. It empowers them with a sense of agency over their future. Finally, it ensures that the lump sums seniors receive during retirement are used properly.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Secretariat for Elders (NSE)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Sri Lanka
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2006
What was implemented?

Local housing developers are involved in several development to cater for the hoousing needs of older Malaysians.  Several  of such housing developments for seniors have emerged in Malaysia in the last decade. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Malaysia

What were the results?

These initiatives have created safer and more inclusive living environments for seniors, enabling them to maintain independence while staying close to family. They have improved access to healthcare, reduced risks of accidents through thoughtful design, and promoted active ageing through community activities and recreational spaces. Retirement villages such as Green Acres and Eden-on-the-Park have provided seniors with opportunities for social engagement and healthy living, reflecting a growing trend toward independent and active lifestyles among older Malaysians.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developers conducted research on seniors’ daily needs and incorporated universal design principles into homes and townships. Implementation involved strategic planning to include healthcare facilities, safe pedestrian pathways, ramps, and community spaces. Projects like Sunway City, Bandar Bukit Raja, and Gamuda Cove were designed to integrate accessibility with lifestyle amenities, while retirement villages were established to offer independent living with optional care services.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This approach addresses the evolving needs of seniors by promoting ageing in place within inclusive communities. It combines safety, accessibility, and social engagement, ensuring older persons can live independently while maintaining a high quality of life.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Private developers
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

Introduced under Article 16.1 of the Labour Code, this law prohibits discrimination in employment, including on the grounds of age. It establishes equal treatment in recruitment, working conditions, remuneration, promotion, and termination of employment. Implemented at the national level, the policy applies to all workers and employers and aims to prevent age-based exclusion and unfair labour practices, thereby supporting equal opportunities and inclusive labour markets.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Vulnerable groups, particularly those at risk of being discriminated, including older persons

How was it developed and implemented?

Non-discrimination in employment in Azerbaijan is grounded in the country’s legal and institutional framework. Article 16 of the Labour Code expressly prohibits discrimination in labour relations during hiring, changes in employment, and termination on grounds such as citizenship, sex, race, nationality, language, place of residence, social origin, age, family circumstances, religion, political views, trade union membership, or other factors unrelated to professional qualifications and job performance. Employers are barred from directly or indirectly limiting rights or establishing privileges based on these prohibited grounds. Legal protections are reinforced through the Law on Employment, which guarantees equal opportunities to exercise the right to free choice of job and employment irrespective of personal characteristics. Persons who believe they have faced discrimination may seek recourse in courts under the Labour Code.  

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The non-discrimination provisions in Azerbaijan’s labour framework are a good practice because they codify clear legal prohibitions against discrimination across multiple grounds in employment relations, linking them to both the Labour Code and the Law on Employment. This provides a comprehensive legal basis for equal treatment in hiring, conditions of work, and termination. The model is replicable, as the legal norms align with international standards (including ILO Convention 111 on discrimination in employment) and can be adopted or strengthened in other legal systems. It is sustainable insofar as the rights are enforceable through the judicial system, offering legal remedies to individuals who experience discrimination in employment.  

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Azerbaijan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Azerbaijan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1999
What was implemented?

A presidential decree aiming to protect older persons at retirement age from being terminated contracts.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons at retirement age

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed by the government of Uzbekistan as a presidential decree and implemented by relevant state bodies responsible for drafting/adjusting labour rules and applying them nationally.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It supports older persons by addressing age discrimination through retirement age as an automatic grounds for dismissal, thus protecting older persons right, income and social participation.

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/3192

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Uzbekistan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Uzbekistan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

In the Kurgan region a third of the population are pensioners and nine per cent persons with disabilities. Many of them live in rural areas with limited access to specialized facilities and services such as psychologists, urologists, neurologists, cardiologists, and others. Families with elderly people with disabilities also lack psychological or legal support. At best, only the economic challenges of old age are addressed, while the complex issues of self-identity, leisure activities, and intergenerational relationships remain unaddressed. To improve access to services and social interaction, the project organized consultations for older persons and their families with professionals in medicine, psychology, and law. Also, active social activities were organized and target groups were taught healthy lifestyle skills.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Senior citizens aged 55 years and over and their care givers living in rural areas of the Kurgan region.

What were the results?

The "Hello!" project reached over 800 people and 24 municipalities in the Trans-Urals region.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It targeted rural areas where older people and their caregivers often face isolation and limited access to specialized services. The project supported older adults by strengthening their physical, emotional, intellectual, and creative capacities, building social connections, promoting healthy‑lifestyle literacy and awareness of pensioners’ rights, and reinforcing their social participation. It also stimulated volunteer engagement among older people and fostered a sense of community. For organizers, it provided an opportunity to further develop their professional skills.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments; Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2017-2018
What was implemented?

This programme seeks to improve the quality of life and well-being of isolated older persons through establishing sustainable and holistic home care services in Armenia. The establishment of high-quality home care services includes qualification and professionalization of employees in nursing services and development and testing of a monitoring and evaluation mechanism for the service, as well as outlining its financing mechanisms. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Socially vulnerable people with home care needs in in Gyumri & Vanadzor (Armenia), including persons over 65 years of age.

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed through partners with Governments and faith-based organizations. To ensure long‑term sustainability, the project developed specialized gerontology and geriatrics training modules, approved by the Ministry of Health, partnered with vocational schools to train 120 nursing students and provides qualification training for 30 active nurses.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The project promotes a community-based care model, with adequate training and oversight.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Caritas Germany in collaboration with the Ministry of Labor and Social affairs of the Republic of Armenia and grants from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Armenia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2025-2027
What was implemented?

The Proximity Housing Grant (PHG) in Singapore, implemented by the Sinaporean Government and the Housing & Development Board, aims to help Singaporeans reduce the cost of purchasing property to live with or near their parents or children. This initiative promotes intergenerational contact by enouraging families to live close together.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Eligible Singaporean families, married couples, and singles (35+) purchasing resale HDB flats to live with or within 4km of their parents or married child.

What were the results?

Up to 2020, around 30,100 applicants had applied, with about 4,500 families and singles choosing to live in the same block—or even the same flat—as their parents or children, and HDB disbursed about S$550 million under PHG.

How was it developed and implemented?

PHG was established following extensive “Housing Conversations” in 2014 under the theme “Closer Families; Stronger Ties,” and was embedded into the housing subsidy framework by the MND and HDB in August 2015.The scheme was later enhanced in February 2018, increasing grant amounts and simplifying proximity rules.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It promotes stronger family support networks, is widely inclusive, and has demonstrably enabled thousands of families to live closer together—enhancing informal caregiving and social support.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Singapore, Housing & Development Board
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2015
What was implemented?

PAWE is a community-based initiative established to support the well-being of older persons in Malaysia. It provides a dedicated space for seniors to engage in social, educational, physical, and health-related activities that promote active ageing. PAWE aims to create an environment where older persons can remain healthy, socially connected, and empowered through lifelong learning and personal development.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Malaysia

What were the results?

PAWE has improved the quality of life for thousands of older persons by providing opportunities for physical fitness, social interaction, and continuous learning. It has helped reduce isolation, enhanced mental and physical health, and fostered a sense of belonging among seniors. The centres have become focal points for community engagement and support for older persons.

How was it developed and implemented?

The initiative was developed by the Malaysian government in collaboration with other government agencies and NGOs. PAWE centres were established across Malaysia to provide structured programs, including exercise sessions, social gatherings, educational workshops, and health services. Recruitment and participation are promoted through community outreach, social media, and partnerships with local organisations.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

PAWE addresses multiple dimensions of older persons’ well-being, including physical, social, and mental, through an inclusive and community-based approach. It promotes active ageing, lifelong learning, and social support, ensuring seniors remain engaged and empowered. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Welfare Services (with the partnership of NGOs and some national universities)
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2015

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.