Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

Türkiye’s LTC policy, as reflected in the Information Guide for Older Persons – IV (2023), is a mixed, multi‑pillar system combining family‑based care, home‑based services, community‑based supports, and institutional long‑term care. The overarching principle is to enable older persons to live with dignity in their preferred environment, prioritizing care at home whenever possible. The primary goal is for older persons to remain in their own homes and communities, with support as needed. Only when this is not feasible does the system rely on institutional care. A core pillar of Türkiye’s LTC policy is the home‑care allowance provided under Law 2828 to support dependent older persons living with family. There are also day care and active living centers. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older women and men in Türkiye requiring long-term care

How was it developed and implemented?

Türkiye’s long‑term care (LTC) policy was developed through a gradual, legally grounded process that began with the adoption of Law No. 2828 – Social Services Law in 1983, which established the purpose, scope, institutional structure, and definitions necessary to organize care for older adults, persons with disabilities, and others in need. This law created the foundation for a nationwide system by defining key LTC populations (such as older persons in need and severely disabled persons), regulating social service institutions (including care homes and rehabilitation centers), and assigning responsibility to public and private providers. Over time, Türkiye expanded LTC through regulations and programs authorized under Law 2828—such as home‑based care, community day‑care and active living centers, and mixed public‑private residential care—integrating these services into the broader social protection system.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The policy reflects a comprehensive, rights‑based, multi‑level system that supports older persons through home‑based, community‑based, and institutional care, with the primary aim of supporting "ageing in place". It further offers a comprehensive range of services across the full long-term care continuum. 

Supporting documents:

Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi - Law 2828 (original text)

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The policy is overseen by the Ministry of Family and Social Services. Key stakeholders who are involved in the implementation of the policy include local municipalities, healthcare providers, social service organizations, and non-governmental organization
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
1983
What was implemented?

The Rehabilitation Home in Saitama, Japan is a large complex designed for multigenerational interaction. People of all ages come together there. It offers daycare services for seniors and children with disabilities, as well as nursery schools. Spending time together benefits people of all ages, and the exchange of knowledge between the facilities benefits them all.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older residents and persons with disabilities

What were the results?

It has been reported that older persons who were previously unemotional began smiling after spending time with children at these facilities. The positive emotional impact of intergenerational interactions is also scientifically proven.

How was it developed and implemented?

The facilities are designed to be integrated into the community and part of everyday life, rather than isolated elderly care facilities. Having facilities for nursery school, childcare, and elderly care all together allows the elderly to actively participate in childcare responsibilities. Furthermore, social activities such as Active Kitchens and social gatherings are also held.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The organization promotes intergenerational connections that benefit people of all ages while addressing the medical needs and social challenges of individuals with health issues.

Supporting documents:

http://ahwin.org/rehab-home-ippo
 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Rehab Home Ippo Group
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

This portal was developed to consolidate data on ageing population  in Malaysia. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Data users and policy makers

What were the results?

Data users are provided with an interactive data visualisation tool that provides information related to population statistics, ageing and life expectancy.

How was it developed and implemented?

The MyAgeing Dashboard integrates various primary data sources published by the department, including current population estimates, census data, vital statistics and life expectancy reports. It also includes administrative data from various ministries, departments and government agencies, including healthcare and social services data for older persons.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The dashboard integrates various primary data sources and features articles and the latest news on ageing issues, from both domestic and international sources.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Statistics, Malaysia (DOSM)
Categories:
Data and research
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

Concession Card is a stored value personalised smartcard for dedicated group to use for travel on RapidKL buses, LRT, Monorail, MRT and MRT feeder buses.

What were the results?

Taking public transport is now more affordable for older persons as they are able to benefit from transportation discounts with MyRapid.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It makes transportation more affordable and thus facilitates the participation of older persons in economy and society. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Prasarana Malaysia Berhad.
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

NACSCOM is a national umbrella organization that advocates for policies and services to improve the quality of life of older persons in Malaysia. It coordinates older person organizations, promotes Asian family values, and organizes programs to support and empower older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Malaysia; policymakers who have a focal point for issues related to older persons. 

What were the results?

It has successfully created a platform for older persons to voice concerns, strengthened community engagement, and fostered intergenerational understanding. NACSCOM has become a recognized advocate for older persons’ rights and welfare in Malaysia.

How was it developed and implemented?

NASCOM, the National Council of Senior Citizens Organisations Malaysia, was established in 1990 as a national umbrella body to coordinate, support, and advocate for senior citizen organisations across the country. It was formally registered under PPM-001-10-14071990 and founded to promote the welfare, rights, and active participation of older Malaysians while fostering respect for older persons, enhancing intergenerational understanding, and providing a platform for senior citizens to voice concerns to relevant authorities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It empowers older persons, promotes respect and dignity, and strengthens social cohesion. By fostering intergenerational communication and leverageing community participation, NACSCOM addresses both social and emotional needs of older persons.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Categories:
Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1990
What was implemented?

This project is a multi-sectoral framework that is designed to create an ecosystem for older persons in India to age with dignity. It addresses the five main needs of senior citizens: financial security, food, healthcare, human interaction, and safety and wellbeing. It functions as an umbrella scheme, integrating financial security, health, and social participation into one strategy. One goal is to create a shift from the welfare-only approach (traditional) to a rights-based model, allowing elderly to experience active and productive ageing. For example, SACRED is an IT portal helping retired professionals find jobs in the 'Silver Economy". SAGE initiative supports startups to create elderly-friendly products. Elderline is a 24/7 national helpline that provides immediate assistance, legal advice, and emotional support to those in need. This plan is fairly decentralized, requiring individual states to develop their own State Action Plans to target specific demographic needs.
 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Mostly senior citizens 60+.  Focus on vulnerable/below the poverty line elderly for the pensions and shelter, and focus on active seniors for the job portal and pension funds.

What were the results?

This action plan as been a breakthrough in accessibility for the elderly in India. There are now more that 696 senior citizens homes nationwide, and the Elderline has received millions of calls regarding emotional support, legal aid and rescue requests. Overall this programme significantly increased financial security by increasing subscription to the pension programme. Additionally, it mainstreams ageing by coordinating over 23 government agencies to ensure senior citizens are treated as economic and social contributors.

How was it developed and implemented?

This plan was developed as a response to Indias rapidly growing population and informed by the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI - the worlds largest study on elderly health and economic security. This policy was developed through seven working groups and consultations with the National Institute of Social Defense and civil society experts. Implemented on the ground by local NGOs and State Governments.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

his action plan is highly replicable. The Elderline was an innovative creation. It provided one contact point for all elderly with a crisis. The SACRED portal allows elderly to continue contributing to the economy and stop being dependent on family. The policy aims to stop treating seniors solely as recipients and shift to them being contributors.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Government of India, more specifically The Ministry of Social Justice
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Comprehensive policy frameworks)
Country:
India
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The National Adaptation Plan, implemented by the Ministry of the Environment and the Government of New Zealand, is a plan that aims to help all New Zealand citizens, including older persons cope with the current and anticipated impact of climate change. This plan outlines specific actions over the next six years to enhance resilience across sectors and communities, with the plan proposing measures to improve bulding standards, target government insurance schemes and support community relocation, whilse emphasising awareness campaigns to prepare older persons or cliate hazards and to promote adaptation strategies.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Beneficiaries include coastal communities, rural populations, low-income households, disabled persons, and Māori and Pacific peoples who are disproportionately exposed to climate hazards.

What were the results?

The programme integrates resource management, emergency response, and three-waters reforms, enhancing national resilience by improving risk awareness and coordinated adaptation tools.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed from the 2020 Climate Change Risk Assessment, the Plan was refined through public consultation with local government, iwi/Māori, Pacific communities, NGOs, and businesses. It set six-year rolling actions across multiple ministries, combining legislation reform, policy measures, and data-sharing platforms.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is New Zealand’s first integrated, whole-of-government adaptation plan, built on inclusive consultation and systemic reform—making it replicable and resilient.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry for the Environment, Govt. of New Zealand
Categories:
Emergency situations (Climate change)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2022-2028
What was implemented?

The National Ageing Policy (2017-2030), implemented by the Cambodian Government, is a framework that addresses the multifaceted challenges of population ageing. Key initiatives of the policy include expanding social protection, incentivizing age-friendly workplaces, promoting healthy ageing and ensuring access to quality healthcare and geriatric services. The policy also emphasizes caregiver training, community support and protection against elder abuse, whilst preparing younger populations for ageing through awareness campaigns.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Cambodian citizens aged 60 and above, especially vulnerable groups—older women, rural elders, those with disabilities or financial insecurity. It also includes the younger population in awareness and intergenerational support strategies.

What were the results?

NAP 2017–2030 laid out a phased implementation through a Three-Year Action Plan (2018–2020), operationalized across nine priority areas like financial security, health, living arrangements, older people’s associations (OPAs), and intergenerational relations. A coordinating body—the Cambodia National Committee for Older People—was empowered to monitor and review implementation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The policy was crafted through broad stakeholder consultation, aligning with national strategic frameworks and global ageing commitments. It launched in phases, with the first Action Plan (2018–2020) operationalizing initiatives through ministries, civil society, and development partners.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It offers a holistic, phased, and inclusive approach—translating a long‑term ageing vision into structured, coordinated action that bridges policy and community implementation through cross‑sector partnerships.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Cambodia
Categories:
Older persons and development (Comprehensive policy frameworks)
Country:
Cambodia
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
2017-2030
What was implemented?

A nationwide research project to establish evidence for elder abuse (which was previously unmeasured). The Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale was used to conduct a longitudinal study of ageing New Zealanders living alone. Abuse was categorized into 4 themes: vulnerability, coercion, dependence, dejection. Questions were embedded into a existing study, allowing researchers insight into real feelings of the elderly, as shame plays a large role in getting accurate data on elderly abuse.  

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons surviving abuse, as the study had made abuse visible. 

What were the results?

Analysis of abuse of older persons was made available with a separate analysis of Maori older persons. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Since primary data on abuse of older persons had not been available, the center decided to develop a tool to screen abuse of older persons and to conduct a survey to collect data. The Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale tool was chosen as it asks questions about elderly abuse without addressing it obviously, and therefore people were more likely to give a genuine answer. Longitudinal study allows data to be linked with health and economic records. It was executed as a nation-wide survey via post.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Before this study, elderly abuse was a hidden issue, and now it is a documented government priority. Disguising questions in order to get data where participants did not feel shame was an effective methodological choice. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Family Center Social Policy Research Unit and the Office for Senior Citizens
Categories:
Data and research (Survey); Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2015
What was implemented?

The Grandparents’ Day Celebration brings together older persons, their families, and the wider community to celebrate and support the well-being of grandparents through information awareness sessions and a family evening. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Children, Young Adults and Elderly residing in Sh.Funadhoo

What were the results?

The initiative encouraged active participation of older persons, provided valuable information on pension schemes, and featured a family evening with interactive games promoting financial literacy, reinforcing the importance of intergenerational connections and the sharing of knowledge and resources across generations.

How was it developed and implemented?

The event was developed in collaboration  Ministry of Social and Family Development, Local Government Authority, Sh. Atoll Coundil and Sh. Funadhoo Island Council. It is being conducted in collaboration with the Ministry of Social and Family Development, Local Government Authority and the Sh Atoll Council including government organizations in the Sh.Atoll

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme fosters intergenerational connection and community engagement while raising awareness. By combining educational sessions with family-oriented activities, it not only informs participants about issues affecting elderly but also encourages family support, social inclusion, and active participation of elderly in community life.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The event was conducted in collaboration with the Ministry of Social and Family Development, Local Government Authority and the Sh Atoll Council including government organizations in the Sh.Atoll
Categories:
Older persons and development
Country:
Maldives
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2024

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.