Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

Ibasho projects aim to create elder-led, socially integrated, and sustainable communities where older adults are respected and empowered to take leadership roles. Through placemaking and multigenerational engagement, these initiatives help shift perceptions of aging from decline to opportunity, fostering resilience and cultural continuity. Each project involves elders designing and managing community hubs that serve as spaces for social interaction, economic activity, and disaster recovery, with Ibasho providing technical support until the community becomes self-sufficient. It started in Japan in 2012 after the Great East Japan Earthquake, when older persons created and managed a hub with a café, garden, farmers’ market, daycare, evacuation center, and cultural teaching space. Since then, other projects were replicated after natural disasters, such as in the Philippines in 2014 after typhoon yolanda and in Nepal in 2015 after the earthquake. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older and younger persons in the respective communities benefit from stronger social ties. Older persons overall benefit from a changed image of ageing and older persons. 

What were the results?

In Japan, participation in the initiative led to a stronger sense of belonging in the community, according to a research study. In the Philippines and Nepal, quantitative research found that Ibasho significantly enhanced social ties among older persons. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed through a community-driven approach. The Ibasho project engaged with local communities to understand their needs, cultural context, and aspiration and jointly define their goals. The Ibasho team provides capacity-building. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice led to empowerment of older persons, changes the image of older persons and is an intergenerationanl project. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local community elders with the Ibasho team (NGO)
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Emergency situations (Natural disasters); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives, Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The Implementation Plan to Address Difficulties of the Elderly on the Use of Smart Technology, implemented in China by the General Office of the State Council, outlines recommendations to promote the digital literacy of older persons, namely helping individuals use smart technology and enhance their sense of inclusion and safety in the digital world.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries were older adults in China, particularly those with limited digital skills or access. The policy aimed to help them navigate smart technologies and access essential services like healthcare, transportation, and government support more easily.

What were the results?

The initiative ensures older persons’ access to essential services by retaining manual systems, enhancing digital interfaces with age-friendly features, and expanding nationwide volunteer and training programs, thereby promoting digital inclusion, autonomy, and social participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The policy was issued by the State Council in 2020 and coordinated across key ministries. Local governments adapted it through specific work plans—adding manual service counters, redesigning apps, and offering training. Tech companies supported implementation by upgrading platforms. Regular follow-ups ensured progress and consistency nationwide.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The policy is a good practice because it combined top-level coordination with local innovation to quickly close the digital gap for older adults. It ensured equal access to essential services during emergencies like COVID-19, promoted inclusive technology design, and launched sustainable training and volunteer programs. Its success has been widely recognized as a model for balancing digital advancement with social equity.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
General Office of the State Council
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The government provides social, medical and care services to vulnerable citizens, including to older persons. Older persons  who have reached the statutory retirement age, who are unable to care for themselves independently and who do not reside with able-bodied adult children or spouses are entitled to this service. The service includes assistance with paying bills, shopping, cooking, making medical appointments and reaching medical facilities, among others.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People requiring care in Kazakhstan, including children with disabilities and home-bound older persons without family caregiver. 

What were the results?

People who previously had no access to care—especially home‑bound older adults and persons with disabilities—are now eligible for state‑provided in‑home support.

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of home‑based services occurred alongside broader reforms aimed at improving social welfare, aligning with international standards, and addressing gaps in long‑term care.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice provides access to care, reaches vulnerable older persons and facilitates ageing in place. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

Inclusive Employment Australia is a specialist disability employment programme. It assists people with disability, injury or health condition to prepare for, find and maintain work and grow their career. It replaced the Disability Employment Services (DES) program on 1 November 2025. Inclusive Employment Australia helps create a more inclusive future. The programme places participants at the centre of the service. It improves and simplifies services for people looking for work, as well as for employers and service providers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Individuals with a disability who seek employment

How was it developed and implemented?

Inclusive Employment Australia, formerly Disability Employment Services (DES), replaced DES on 1 November 2025.The Disability Employment Services (DES) supported people with disability, injury and/or health condition to gain employment. People with disability may have been eligible for one of two different parts of the DES program: Disability Management Service was for job seekers with disability, injury or health condition who need assistance to find a job and occasional support in the workplace to keep a job. Employment Support Service was for job seekers with permanent disability who need help to find a job and who need regular, ongoing support in the workplace to keep a job.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Social Services
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

The Income Test for the Age Pension is a framework Services Australia uses to determine whether someone qualifies for the Age Pension and how much they can receive by assessing income from all sources—including wages, savings, shares, superannuation, and other financial assets (using deeming rules). It sets “free areas” where no pension reduction applies, then reduces payments for income above those thresholds, with different rates for singles, couples, and transitional-rate pensioners; if income exceeds specific cut‑off points, the pension for that fortnight becomes zero. It is also a tool for pensioners to understand how much they can earn from other sources without losing out on their pension. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Australian retirees reaching statutory pension age, who now receive pension support based on assessed income levels to ensure fair access.

What were the results?

This change streamlined eligibility, improving transparency and equity in pension access. Nearly 80% of age‑eligible Australians now receive some form of age pension, with 50% receiving the full rate—a high take-up compared to other countries.

How was it developed and implemented?

The income test is managed by Services Australia to ensure fair pension access based on declared and verified income. It is implemented through automated assessments, online tools (like MyGov), and regular income reporting. Thresholds are periodically updated, and the system integrates with tax and employment data for accuracy and efficiency.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The reform provides a transparent, needs-based pension framework that ensures broad coverage while preserving sustainability—delivering fairness and social protection effectively.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Australian Government, Services Australia
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2009
What was implemented?

The document is a comprehensive national guide from Türkiye that explains all services, rights, benefits, and support mechanisms available to older persons, compiled by public institutions for the year 2023. It is designed to help older adults, families, caregivers, and professionals understand what assistance exists and how to access it. It outlines policy goals, gives information on pensions and access thereto, support for widowed women, health services, home care allowance, available long-term care, education opportunities, access to parks etc. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older men and women in Türkiye

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This guide gathers all relevant services and rights into one document, making it easier for older persons to understand what is available and how to access it.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Family and Social Services of Türkiye (Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The project builds a sustainable system of integrated home care provision with nurses, home helpers and volunteers. It mobilizes the community and promotes the concept of active and healthy ageing. 

Services include:

Services include:

  • Nursing and basic medical care
  • Assistance with daily living (home helpers)
  • Psychosocial support
  • Referrals to health and social services
Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons requiring long-termcare. 

What were the results?

Assessments and partner reporting show:

  • Improved quality of life and functional ability
  • Reduced caregiver burden on families
  • Increased autonomy and dignity among older persons
  • Strengthened community solidarity

These outcomes have been highlighted by both development partners and government stakeholders as a viable long‑term care model for Armenia

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by the Armenian Red Cross in collaboration with Swiss Red Cross society

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Instead of institutionalisation, the programme provides integrated medico‑social home care, allowing older persons to remain in their homes as long as possible — a strong preference identified in Armenia through baseline studies. Beyond care provision, the programme actively promotes active and healthy ageing,

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Armenian Red Cross Society (ARCS), in partnership with the Swiss Red Cross
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Long-term care)
Country:
Armenia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

Viet Nam has pioneered an integrated community-based long-term care model that supports older persons to age in place through coordinated health and social care services. Trained community caregivers provide home-based support, conduct needs assessments, and connect older persons with health and social protection services. The model strengthens family caregiving while reducing caregiver burden and improving older persons' well-being. Pilot implementation in multiple provinces has demonstrated positive outcomes and provides a promising framework for scaling up affordable, person-centred long-term care in rapidly ageing societies.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons with reduced physical or cognitive functioning, including in rural and underserved communities as well as family caregivers. 

What were the results?

The integrated community-based long-term care pilot in Viet Nam improved the health, well-being, and independence of older persons by providing coordinated home- and community-based health and social care services. Through regular home visits, needs assessments, and individualized care plans, older people were better able to manage chronic conditions, maintain daily functioning, and remain in their communities. The programme also reduced the burden on family caregivers by offering training, guidance, and support. In addition, it strengthened collaboration among health providers, social services, community organizations, and volunteers, demonstrating a practical, scalable, and cost-effective model for supporting healthy ageing and ageing in place.

How was it developed and implemented?

The groundwork was established through the ADB regional technical assistance project Strengthening Developing Member Countries' Capacity in Elderly Care, which included Viet Nam and supported the development of LTC policies, planning, and stakeholder capacity.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Integrated Community-Based Long-Term Care (LTC) Model in Viet Nam is considered a good practice because it provides person-centred, community-based care that enables older persons to age in place, rather than relying on costly institutional care. By bringing health and social services together, the model addresses the multiple and interconnected needs of older people in a coordinated manner. 

The programme also strengthens and supports family caregiving, which remains the primary source of long-term care in Viet Nam. Through training, guidance, and community support, it reduces the physical, emotional, and financial burden on family caregivers while improving the quality of care provided to older persons. 

Another key strength is its use of local resources and community networks, including commune health stations, community caregivers, volunteers, and Older Persons' Associations. This makes the model relatively affordable, sustainable, and adaptable to both rural and urban settings.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Multi-stakeholder partnership with Ministry of Health, Intergenerational Self-Help Clubs, Viet Nam Association of the Elderly, international development partners
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Viet Nam
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2023-present
What was implemented?

The Integrated Community-Based Screening Programme (ICBSP) is a model where healthcare workers visit villages and remote areas to screen older persons for the 'big five' impairments (visual and hearing loss, mobility decline, cognitive impairment, malnutrition, and depression).  

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in rural areas/villages in Bhutan

What were the results?

Data collected from this model enabled the creation of a national Digital Health Database for seniors. Through the health checks, it was found that around 20% of seniors living rurally needed immediate interventions for cataracts or mobility issues. These interventions would have gone unnoticed without the ICBSP model.

How was it developed and implemented?

his model was developed as a response to the country's demographic shift. The wellbeing of Bhutanese elderly was usually viewed through the Gross National Happiness philosophy. This is the first standardized medical model that brings geriatric care into the primary care system.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This model adopts the WHO model of Integrated Care for Older People, but adapts it for rural settings by making the screening mobile rather than hospital-based.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Ministry of Health (MoH) and Local District Governments
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Bhutan
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The CNMI Office on Aging provides a package of community-based services designed to support older persons and persons with disabilities across the islands of Saipan, Tinian and Rota. The programme operates multi-purpose senior centres that offer nutritious meals, exercise sessions, health-related activities, social interaction and recreational opportunities in a safe and accessible environment. Transportation services help older persons access pensions, Social Security benefits, medical appointments, financial institutions and essential community services. The programme also promotes active ageing through computer literacy classes, cultural activities, music, arts and crafts, gardening, physical exercise and intergenerational learning opportunities. The Nutrition Services Program provides both congregate meals for active participants and home-delivered meals for homebound older persons, helping reduce malnutrition and social isolation while enabling older persons to remain in their homes and communities. 
 

A YouTube channel by the Office of Ageing raises awareness on healthy and active ageing. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Northern Mariana Islands

What were the results?

The programme has created accessible community hubs for older persons on all three inhabited islands

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme originated when the Older Americans Act (OAA) was extended to the Northern Marianas in 1974, leading to the establishment of an ageing programme for older persons in the territory. The current Office on Aging emerged as the institutional mechanism responsible for implementing OAA-funded services for older persons

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice adopts a holistic approach to ageing by integrating nutrition, mobility, social participation, lifelong learning, health promotion and community support within a single service system.

Supporting documents:

(427) CNMI OoA - YouTube

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Office of Ageing
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Northern Mariana Islands
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
N/A

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.