Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

Singapore offers housing that is already fitted with senior friendly amendments for seniors who wish to move, Community Care Apartments (CCA). These apartments come with flexible lease lengths, and the buildings have amenities that support environmentally sustainable living, community building activities, and they are affordable for all inhabitants. Additionally, there is an onsite manager trained to coordinate 24-hour emergency response. The scheme also supports inter-generational living situations, allowing Singaporean seniors to age in place due to the accessible housing. For seniors who do not wish to move, the EASE (Enhancement for Active Seniors) scheme implements heavy subsidies to retrofit flats with senior friendly features. This programme also offers different scenarios for different needs, such as the opportunity for seniors who already own flats to selling part of their lease to the Housing Development Board and receive a stream of income while continuing to live in the flat.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Those aged 55 or over

What were the results?

80% of Singapore's elderly population lives in this senior friendly housing. This programme is highly successful, as it has been ongoing from 1998 until present day.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as a response to the finding that Singapore would become a 'super aged' society by the year 2026, which triggered the need to provide adequate housing. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme allows older persons to have autonomy in their living situation, they can have access to housing that suits their physical needs, and the short leases allow them to have freedom to choose where they want to live. Supports the ageing-in-place philosophy.

Supporting documents:

HDB | For Our Seniors

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Housing and Development Board (HDB) + Government of Singapore
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
1998 - ongoing
What was implemented?

The Japanese Organization for Employment of the Elderly, Persons with Disabilities and Job Seekers (JEED), implemented by the Human Resources Development Center on Productivity Improvement, aims to provide training for middle-aged and older persons working in small- and medium-sized enterprises to help them create post-retirement employment plans. Additionally, this programme comprises of an intergenerational initiative whereby older workers are trained to coach junior workers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Middle-aged and older workers who receive short, job-embedded training to upgrade skills, plan post-retirement pathways and stay employed up to age 70.

What were the results?

In 2024, 31.9% of Japanese employers secured job opportunities up to age 70, up from 29.7% in 2023, with SMEs leading at 32.4%.

How was it developed and implemented?

Delivered through Human Resources Productivity Support Centers at JEED Polytechnic Centers: 1) counseling & “Human Resources Training Plans,” 2) short skills-upgrade seminars for employees, 3) productivity-improvement training (explicitly including middle-aged and older employees and know-how transfer), and 4) dispatch of instructors and facility/equipment rental.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme is tailored to small and medium-sized enterprises, offering flexible, short-format courses and on-site support that align with real production schedules. Its intergenerational approach equips middle-aged and older workers to adapt to evolving roles while transferring skills to younger colleagues. JEED’s tools—including grants guidance, planning resources, and training—are closely aligned with Japan’s post-2021 legal framework to promote employment up to age 70. The initiative has achieved measurable progress, with steady annual growth in companies adopting age-70 employment measures between 2021 and 2024, demonstrating strong system-level impact.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Japan Organization for Employment of the Elderly, Persons with Disabilities and Job Seekers (JEED)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

Ibasho projects aim to create elder-led, socially integrated, and sustainable communities where older adults are respected and empowered to take leadership roles. Through placemaking and multigenerational engagement, these initiatives help shift perceptions of aging from decline to opportunity, fostering resilience and cultural continuity. Each project involves elders designing and managing community hubs that serve as spaces for social interaction, economic activity, and disaster recovery, with Ibasho providing technical support until the community becomes self-sufficient. It started in Japan in 2012 after the Great East Japan Earthquake, when older persons created and managed a hub with a café, garden, farmers’ market, daycare, evacuation center, and cultural teaching space. Since then, other projects were replicated after natural disasters, such as in the Philippines in 2014 after typhoon yolanda and in Nepal in 2015 after the earthquake. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older and younger persons in the respective communities benefit from stronger social ties. Older persons overall benefit from a changed image of ageing and older persons. 

What were the results?

In Japan, participation in the initiative led to a stronger sense of belonging in the community, according to a research study. In the Philippines and Nepal, quantitative research found that Ibasho significantly enhanced social ties among older persons. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed through a community-driven approach. The Ibasho project engaged with local communities to understand their needs, cultural context, and aspiration and jointly define their goals. The Ibasho team provides capacity-building. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice led to empowerment of older persons, changes the image of older persons and is an intergenerationanl project. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local community elders with the Ibasho team (NGO)
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Emergency situations (Natural disasters); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives, Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The Implementation Plan to Address Difficulties of the Elderly on the Use of Smart Technology, implemented in China by the General Office of the State Council, outlines recommendations to promote the digital literacy of older persons, namely helping individuals use smart technology and enhance their sense of inclusion and safety in the digital world.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries were older adults in China, particularly those with limited digital skills or access. The policy aimed to help them navigate smart technologies and access essential services like healthcare, transportation, and government support more easily.

What were the results?

The initiative ensures older persons’ access to essential services by retaining manual systems, enhancing digital interfaces with age-friendly features, and expanding nationwide volunteer and training programs, thereby promoting digital inclusion, autonomy, and social participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The policy was issued by the State Council in 2020 and coordinated across key ministries. Local governments adapted it through specific work plans—adding manual service counters, redesigning apps, and offering training. Tech companies supported implementation by upgrading platforms. Regular follow-ups ensured progress and consistency nationwide.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The policy is a good practice because it combined top-level coordination with local innovation to quickly close the digital gap for older adults. It ensured equal access to essential services during emergencies like COVID-19, promoted inclusive technology design, and launched sustainable training and volunteer programs. Its success has been widely recognized as a model for balancing digital advancement with social equity.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
General Office of the State Council
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The government provides social, medical and care services to vulnerable citizens, including to older persons. Older persons  who have reached the statutory retirement age, who are unable to care for themselves independently and who do not reside with able-bodied adult children or spouses are entitled to this service. The service includes assistance with paying bills, shopping, cooking, making medical appointments and reaching medical facilities, among others.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People requiring care in Kazakhstan, including children with disabilities and home-bound older persons without family caregiver. 

What were the results?

People who previously had no access to care—especially home‑bound older adults and persons with disabilities—are now eligible for state‑provided in‑home support.

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of home‑based services occurred alongside broader reforms aimed at improving social welfare, aligning with international standards, and addressing gaps in long‑term care.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice provides access to care, reaches vulnerable older persons and facilitates ageing in place. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Income Test for the Age Pension is a framework Services Australia uses to determine whether someone qualifies for the Age Pension and how much they can receive by assessing income from all sources—including wages, savings, shares, superannuation, and other financial assets (using deeming rules). It sets “free areas” where no pension reduction applies, then reduces payments for income above those thresholds, with different rates for singles, couples, and transitional-rate pensioners; if income exceeds specific cut‑off points, the pension for that fortnight becomes zero. It is also a tool for pensioners to understand how much they can earn from other sources without losing out on their pension. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Australian retirees reaching statutory pension age, who now receive pension support based on assessed income levels to ensure fair access.

What were the results?

This change streamlined eligibility, improving transparency and equity in pension access. Nearly 80% of age‑eligible Australians now receive some form of age pension, with 50% receiving the full rate—a high take-up compared to other countries.

How was it developed and implemented?

The income test is managed by Services Australia to ensure fair pension access based on declared and verified income. It is implemented through automated assessments, online tools (like MyGov), and regular income reporting. Thresholds are periodically updated, and the system integrates with tax and employment data for accuracy and efficiency.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The reform provides a transparent, needs-based pension framework that ensures broad coverage while preserving sustainability—delivering fairness and social protection effectively.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Australian Government, Services Australia
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2009
What was implemented?

The document is a comprehensive national guide from Türkiye that explains all services, rights, benefits, and support mechanisms available to older persons, compiled by public institutions for the year 2023. It is designed to help older adults, families, caregivers, and professionals understand what assistance exists and how to access it. It outlines policy goals, gives information on pensions and access thereto, support for widowed women, health services, home care allowance, available long-term care, education opportunities, access to parks etc. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older men and women in Türkiye

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This guide gathers all relevant services and rights into one document, making it easier for older persons to understand what is available and how to access it.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Family and Social Services of Türkiye (Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The project builds a sustainable system of integrated home care provision with nurses, home helpers and volunteers. It mobilizes the community and promotes the concept of active and healthy ageing. 

Services include:

Services include:

  • Nursing and basic medical care
  • Assistance with daily living (home helpers)
  • Psychosocial support
  • Referrals to health and social services
Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons requiring long-termcare. 

What were the results?

Assessments and partner reporting show:

  • Improved quality of life and functional ability
  • Reduced caregiver burden on families
  • Increased autonomy and dignity among older persons
  • Strengthened community solidarity

These outcomes have been highlighted by both development partners and government stakeholders as a viable long‑term care model for Armenia

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by the Armenian Red Cross in collaboration with Swiss Red Cross society

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Instead of institutionalisation, the programme provides integrated medico‑social home care, allowing older persons to remain in their homes as long as possible — a strong preference identified in Armenia through baseline studies. Beyond care provision, the programme actively promotes active and healthy ageing,

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Armenian Red Cross Society (ARCS), in partnership with the Swiss Red Cross
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Long-term care)
Country:
Armenia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The Integrated Community-Based Screening Programme (ICBSP) is a model where healthcare workers visit villages and remote areas to screen older persons for the 'big five' impairments (visual and hearing loss, mobility decline, cognitive impairment, malnutrition, and depression).  

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in rural areas/villages in Bhutan

What were the results?

Data collected from this model enabled the creation of a national Digital Health Database for seniors. Through the health checks, it was found that around 20% of seniors living rurally needed immediate interventions for cataracts or mobility issues. These interventions would have gone unnoticed without the ICBSP model.

How was it developed and implemented?

his model was developed as a response to the country's demographic shift. The wellbeing of Bhutanese elderly was usually viewed through the Gross National Happiness philosophy. This is the first standardized medical model that brings geriatric care into the primary care system.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This model adopts the WHO model of Integrated Care for Older People, but adapts it for rural settings by making the screening mobile rather than hospital-based.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Ministry of Health (MoH) and Local District Governments
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Bhutan
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Red Crescent Society of Kyrgyzstan implements a community‑based care model for older people that combines home‑based social and health support with active participation and volunteer engagement. Through trained community volunteers working in coordination with state social workers, older persons—particularly those living alone, with disabilities, or in rural areas—receive assistance with daily activities, access to health services, delivery of food and medicines, psychosocial support, and provision of assistive devices. The model also promotes active ageing by supporting day‑care centres, elderly clubs, and self‑help groups where older people contribute as peer supporters and community volunteers. This approach proved especially effective during emergencies, including COVID‑19, enabling outreach to thousands of older people while safeguarding dignity and reducing isolation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons requiring long-term care

What were the results?

The initiative has significantly improved access to social and basic health services for vulnerable older people in Kyrgyzstan, particularly those living alone or with limited mobility. By 2017, the model had reached approximately 400 vulnerable older people, supported by around 200 trained community volunteers, delivering home‑based social care, household assistance, and health‑related support in coordination with state social workers. Importantly, 100% of older persons with low mobility who requested support received assistive equipment, enabling greater independence and social participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The community‑based care initiative for older people in Kyrgyzstan was developed incrementally, in response to growing social care gaps and limited institutional capacity. In the mid‑2010s, the Red Crescent Society of Kyrgyzstan (RCSK) identified increasing isolation, poverty, and unmet care needs among older persons, particularly those living alone or with limited mobility, through its routine social assistance and health outreach work. Drawing on IFRC community‑based home care standards and lessons from volunteer‑led health and social programmes, RCSK piloted a model that combined home‑based support, trained community volunteers, and coordination with state social workers, ensuring complementarity with public social services rather than duplication.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice is cost‑effective, scalable, and aligned with the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing and the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing, making it a transferable example for countries with limited long‑term care infrastructure.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Red Crescent Society of Kyrgyzstan
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Kyrgyzstan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2016

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.