Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The Korean Longitudinal Study on Ageing is conducted regularly to collect data on the situation of older persons in the Republic of Korea. The purpose of KLoSA is to create the basic data needed to devise and implement effective social, economic policies to address the trends that emerge in the process of population ageing.
The data will help identify and observe different dimensions of an aged society, build datasets that enable studies in different fields, and generate data comparable with similar panel studies in other countries (eg. U.S., Europe) that can provide the basis for policy-making and academic studies.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The main beneficiaries are policymakers who will be able to design evidence-based policies through accurate data on an aged society and the situation of older persons. Other beneficiaries are civil society and academia. 

What were the results?

The report’s evidence-based assessment marked the first targeted evaluation of health system readiness for ageing populations in the Pacific, helping the Ministry of Health and NCOP pinpoint critical policy, program, and service gaps.

How was it developed and implemented?

The sampling frame of KLoSA comprises enumeration districts (EDs), as identified by the National Statistical Office’s 2005 Census. Under this frame, Apartment EDs and Ordinary housing (non-apartment) EDs totalled 261,237, excluding island areas and institutions (social welfare facilities). For Wave One, 1,000 sample EDs were selected, with the aim of securing a maximum valid sample size of 10,000 persons, from six households per sample ED. This was decided on the basis of the fact that the average number of household members aged 45 and over was 1.67 in the 2000 Census.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Collecting reliable disaggregated data on ageing is an action area in the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Korea Employment Information Service
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2006
What was implemented?

This programme helps seniors who have been abused by their family members but do not wish to get law enforcement involved. It is a model where seniors and family members can meet in a moderated setting to speak and acknowledge the harm they have been through. The aim is to help seniors repair  relationship with family members and create formal plans to move forward (Safety and Care Plan) without having to involve law enforcement.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in New Zealand

What were the results?

92% of participants reported they felt heard and safer than if they had gone through the route of calling police and using criminal justice processes.

How was it developed and implemented?

This programme was developed through an action-research initiative, aiming to find a solution for victims who do not want to call police on their family. Specially trained mediators implemented this programme alongside social workers.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme respects the seniors decisions to keep their family ties intact while at the same time tacking and hopefully ending their abuse. The talking circle tactic is culturally relevant and is highly effective for indigenous communities within New Zealand.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Victoria University of Wellington in partnership with the Regional Elder Abuse Response Services and the Office for Seniors
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Law and Action Plan, implemented by the Government of Kyrgyzstan and Office of the Prime Minister, aims to ensure a safe and dignified life for older persons in the Kyrgyz Republic. This plan includes a Financial Plan and a Matrix of Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators. The main focus areas of the plan are: equality and non-discrimination, improved access to quality health services for elderly citizens through improved health care and promotion of active ageing, ensured well-being at all life cycle stages, poverty reduction among older citizens and ensured access to public and minicipal services for older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are older citizens of the Kyrgyz Republic—persons aged 60 and above (women from 58, men from 63 as per national definition)—targeting their social protection, health care access, and inclusion.

What were the results?

The programme expanded community social service delivery: 6,075 people received social services during 2019–2020, including 840 elderly citizens.

How was it developed and implemented?

Development began with a UN-supported national demographic and needs survey, followed by policy drafting by an inter-agency working group including the National Statistics Committee and Ministry of Social Development; the action plan was then formally adopted via government decree, with mandated reporting, monitoring, and financial plans established.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a good practice because it was evidence-based, multi-sectoral, and rights-oriented, with clear monitoring and implementation mechanisms, demonstrating measurable early impact.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government, Office of the Prime Minister
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Kyrgyzstan
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

This law defines the state policy on older persons. It is aimed at creating  conditions for older persons to live full lives, participate in economic and political activities, and fulfill their civic duties. The law establishes key concepts such as gerontological services, defines older persons (men aged 63 and older, women aged 58 and older), and outlines social services for senior citizens. The law focuses on creating enabling legal and socio-economic conditions and guarantees a dignified life, development, and self-realization of senior citizens, protecting their rights and legitimate interests. Priority areas include improving the quality of health care and social support services, and ensuring access to information and education, employment, sports, and culture. The law enshrines the social rights and guarantees of older persons, including the right to receive social services, various types of social protection such as pensions, social benefits, home care and institutional care, as well as the right to medical care, education, vocational training, and access to cultural events. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Kyrgyzstan

What were the results?

The law created a state policy foundation defining older persons, gerontological services, and the responsibilities of the state toward them. This formalized ageing as a public policy area and enabled nationwide planning and programme development.

How was it developed and implemented?

Before 2011, Kyrgyzstan lacked comprehensive age‑specific equality legislation. UN treaty bodies and human rights mechanisms repeatedly recommended creation of a national legal framework addressing rights, social protection, and services for older persons. The 2011 law emerged as the policy instrument intended to fill this gap.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Law on Older Citizens has produced system‑level results, including the creation of a coherent national ageing policy framework, standardization of eligibility criteria, expansion of social services, integration of ageing concerns across sectoral laws, and alignment with international ageing agendas.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labor and Social Development of the Kyrgyz Republic, and other relevant ministries
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Kyrgyzstan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

A law on state pension insurance, establishing the legal, economic, and organizational framework for the country’s pension system. It establishes a multi-tiered system depending on profession and ensures regulation, transparency, financial sustainability and social protection for ageing populations. This law creates a comprehensive contributory pension insurance system in Turkmenistan, combining mandatory, professional, and voluntary schemes to protect individuals against old age, disability, and loss of income.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All citizens in the labour force

How was it developed and implemented?

As part of broader social and economic reforms in the 2000s–early 2010s, the government decided to replace fragmented pension regulation with a single comprehensive law creating a state pension insurance system.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a good practice as it provides a legal foundation for comprehensive pension insurance in Turkmenistan. It promotes income security and social protection for all citizens as they reach pension age. 

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/3231

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Pension Fund operating under the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Turkmenistan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The Law of Georgia on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination is aimed at ensuring equal rights and eliminating discrimination in Georgia. The law prohibits all forms of discrimination based on  characteristics including age, race, sex and religion.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Based on Article 1, it includes every natural person in Georgia

What were the results?

Since the law’s adoption, the Public Defender (Ombudsperson) has received and processed a growing number of discrimination complaints each year. This reflects increased public awareness and institutional recognition of discrimination. Also, as a result, practical support mechanisms, such as a hotline, were introduced. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The law was issued by the Parliament of Georgia on 2 May 2014

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The law prohibits discrimination on grounds of age, and applies to social protection, healthcare, education and services.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Georgia
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination)
Country:
Georgia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2014
What was implemented?

A legal‑literacy programme for older people combined thematic lectures–seminars on issues such as housing and communal services, consumer rights, various scams, land rights, or how to contact regulatory authorities with printed handouts; a weekly legal clinic offering individual consultations and step‑by‑step guidance an outreach across numerous municipalities in Sverdlovsk Oblast, coordinated with local Social Protection Centers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries were older adults (predominantly 61–80+ years) identified as most vulnerable to rights violations, fraud, and information gaps; social workers also attended sessions to cascade knowledge to clients. Beneficiaries included residents of multiple municipalities.

What were the results?

Within a six‑month reporting period, the team held 26 consultation days (including remote) and provided legal help to 144 people; delivered 9 lectures–seminars on consumer rights to 190 participants, with additional seminar cycles later expanding participation; cumulative 2019 reporting (July–Dec) notes seminars in 12 municipalities with 259 attendees on housing and communal services topics and 66 attendees on consumer rights in December alone.

How was it developed and implemented?

The NGO prepared accessible educational content (brochures, presentations) tailored to typical rights issues facing older adults; established a weekly reception schedule for the legal clinic (including a remote format during COVID-19 restrictions); and co‑organized venues with municipal social‑protection institutions to reach residents, including those in small or remote settlements. The approach emphasized plain‑language explanations and practical algorithms of action for each case.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?
  • Evidence‑based local reach: multi‑municipality delivery with measured participation and consultations.
  • Actionable literacy: focus on everyday rights (housing/utilities, consumer protection, fraud prevention, land rights) plus step‑by‑step help via the legal clinic.
  • Inclusive access: printed materials for seniors who do not use the internet, and remote consultations when in‑person events were restricted.
  • Institutional anchoring: partnerships with social‑protection centres strengthened uptake and sustainability.
  • Grant backing and transparency: supported by the Presidential Grants Fund with published interim results.
Supporting documents:
View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
NGO 'Right to Protection and Assistance" and local Social Protection Centers
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect, Anti-discrimination); Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2019-2020
What was implemented?

The constitution of Azerbaijan guarantees equal rights for all (Article 25). The Azerbaijani State takes care of "improvement of prosperity of all people and each citizen, their social protection and proper living conditions." (Article 16)

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It creates legal obligations for the state to guarantee the rights of all and to provide social protection. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Azerbaijan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Azerbaijan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1995
What was implemented?

Lifelong Learning Centre (L3C), a one‑stop information hub, provides access to lifelong learning programmes, including upskilling and reskilling opportunities for adults. It supports national talent development and encourages a culture of continuous learning.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Adult learners, including jobseekers, employees, and community members

What were the results?

The Centre expanded access to lifelong learning by offering structured programmes, short courses, industry engagement forums, and collaborations with public and private training providers. It strengthened national skills development, supported workforce readiness and increased enrolment in continuous learning programmes.

How was it developed and implemented?

L3C was developed by the Ministry of Education as part of a strategic initiative to build holistic individuals and an inclusive society. It established policies, frameworks, partnerships and governance mechanisms to ensure high‑quality, industry‑relevant training. The Centre also supports national agencies such as the Manpower Planning Office and the Brunei Employment Centre in aligning learning pathways with workforce needs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Centre strengthens lifelong learning culture, expands accessible learning opportunities and enhances employability. Its inclusive approach, partnerships and alignment with national development goals contribute to long‑term community well‑being.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Education
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Brunei Darussalam
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

The support allowance, which this statute refers to, consists in a sum of money paid from the State Budget to meet the basic needs of the aged and the disabled living in East Timor. The support allowance cannot be added up to other sums of money paid for social protection from the State Budget to the same beneficiary, which have a permanent nature and whose amount is higher than the amount of that one, whether they arise from the contributory regimes of social security system or from the non-contributory ones. Also defines the criteria involving the allowance grant, its amount and the possibility of this one's revision, the procedure ruling the application supporting documents, the decision and the decision impugnation, as well as the role of the organ in charge for the processing.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All older persons in Timor-Leste as it is a universal pension scheme. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Decree‑Law No. 19/2008 was developed in response to constitutional obligations requiring Timor‑Leste to provide social security and special protection for elderly people and persons with disabilities, grounded in Sections 56, 20, and 21 of the Constitution. Recognizing widespread poverty and the urgent need for targeted assistance, the Fourth Constitutional Government incorporated the establishment of a support allowance into its policy agenda. The drafting process involved extensive inter‑ministerial consultations among the ministries responsible for social protection, health, finance, and state administration to coordinate eligibility verification, medical certification, payment systems, and administrative structures. The decree also underwent detailed technical formulation covering eligibility criteria, benefit levels, application procedures, and appeals mechanisms, culminating in its formal approval by the Government under constitutional authority (Sections 115(j) and 116(d)) to establish a fully operational support allowance scheme.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides basic income security to all older persons in Timor-Leste. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry for Social Solidarity
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Timor-Leste
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2008

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.