Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

Lifelong Learning Centre (L3C), a one‑stop information hub, provides access to lifelong learning programmes, including upskilling and reskilling opportunities for adults. It supports national talent development and encourages a culture of continuous learning.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Adult learners, including jobseekers, employees, and community members

What were the results?

The Centre expanded access to lifelong learning by offering structured programmes, short courses, industry engagement forums, and collaborations with public and private training providers. It strengthened national skills development, supported workforce readiness and increased enrolment in continuous learning programmes.

How was it developed and implemented?

L3C was developed by the Ministry of Education as part of a strategic initiative to build holistic individuals and an inclusive society. It established policies, frameworks, partnerships and governance mechanisms to ensure high‑quality, industry‑relevant training. The Centre also supports national agencies such as the Manpower Planning Office and the Brunei Employment Centre in aligning learning pathways with workforce needs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Centre strengthens lifelong learning culture, expands accessible learning opportunities and enhances employability. Its inclusive approach, partnerships and alignment with national development goals contribute to long‑term community well‑being.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Education
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Brunei Darussalam
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

University of the Third Age (U3A) Malaysia is a lifelong learning programme for older persons established in 2007 under the “Lifelong Learning for Older Malaysians” project led by the Institute of Gerontology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, with support from the Government of Malaysia and UNFPA. The programme promotes active and healthy ageing through non-formal education based on the philosophy of “learning for leisure.” It offers a wide range of courses, including healthy lifestyles, languages, computing, arts and crafts, gardening, photography, music and dance. U3A fosters social participation, lifelong learning and community engagement, helping older persons remain active, connected and empowered.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Malaysia

What were the results?

The programme has successfully created a vibrant learning community for older persons, fostering social interaction, mental stimulation, and personal growth. It has empowered seniors to acquire new skills, pursue hobbies, and maintain a sense of purpose. U3A Malaysia has become a recognized platform for promoting active ageing and lifelong learning in the country.

How was it developed and implemented?

U3A Malaysia was developed by the Institute of Gerontology with support from the Government of Malaysia and UNFPA under the 2008–2012 Country Programme. After the success of the LLIFE pilot program, U3A was formalized and registered as the Association for Lifelong Learning of Older Persons in 2010. Activities are primarily hosted at Universiti Putra Malaysia, with administration shared between the Institute and U3A members. Courses are conducted by volunteers and experts, and participation is promoted through community outreach and member-driven planning.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

U3A Malaysia promotes lifelong learning, social inclusion, and active ageing among older persons. It provides a flexible, non-formal education model that enhances mental well-being and combats isolation. Its sustainability through member involvement and adaptability to diverse interests makes it replicable and impactful in improving the quality of life for seniors.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
University of the Third Age (U3A)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Year of implementation:
2007
What was implemented?

The Turkey Lifelong Learning Strategy Document and Action Plan (2014-2018) was launched on May 13, 2014 under the coordination of the Ministry of National Education (MEB), with input from the Ministry of Development and social partners. Building on a prior 2009-2013 strategy, the document established six priority areas with named responsible institutions, partner organizations, timelines, and performance indicators.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Government institutions and organizations responsible for implementing lifelong learning policies and activities.

What were the results?

After having had a dedicated lifelong learning action plan, lifelong learning objectives have been incorporated into broader national education planning documents and Ministry strategies. 
Ministry of National Education Strategic Plan 2019-2023

How was it developed and implemented?

The Plan was produced through workshops involving responsible/related institutions and civil society representatives, then submitted for further consultation before being presented to the 26th Vocational Education Council and formally adopted by the Supreme Planning Board. Implementation is structured via the attached Action Plan, which assigns a named responsible institution and collaborating institutions to each measure, sets a timeframe (mostly 2014-2018, continuous), and defines measurable performance indicators; General Directorate of Lifelong Learning holds overall coordination and monitoring responsibility.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The plan developed fully accountable implementation mechanism including of dozens of measures, lead agencies, collaborating bodies, deadline, and quantifiable performance indicators, closing the gap between strategy and execution. It is replicable, since the six-priority structure and measure-level accountability format can be reapplied to future planning cycles or adapted by other countries.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of National Education, public, private institutions, universities, municipalities, NGOs, international organizations,
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2014-2018
What was implemented?

The support allowance, which this statute refers to, consists in a sum of money paid from the State Budget to meet the basic needs of the aged and the disabled living in East Timor. The support allowance cannot be added up to other sums of money paid for social protection from the State Budget to the same beneficiary, which have a permanent nature and whose amount is higher than the amount of that one, whether they arise from the contributory regimes of social security system or from the non-contributory ones. Also defines the criteria involving the allowance grant, its amount and the possibility of this one's revision, the procedure ruling the application supporting documents, the decision and the decision impugnation, as well as the role of the organ in charge for the processing.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All older persons in Timor-Leste as it is a universal pension scheme. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Decree‑Law No. 19/2008 was developed in response to constitutional obligations requiring Timor‑Leste to provide social security and special protection for elderly people and persons with disabilities, grounded in Sections 56, 20, and 21 of the Constitution. Recognizing widespread poverty and the urgent need for targeted assistance, the Fourth Constitutional Government incorporated the establishment of a support allowance into its policy agenda. The drafting process involved extensive inter‑ministerial consultations among the ministries responsible for social protection, health, finance, and state administration to coordinate eligibility verification, medical certification, payment systems, and administrative structures. The decree also underwent detailed technical formulation covering eligibility criteria, benefit levels, application procedures, and appeals mechanisms, culminating in its formal approval by the Government under constitutional authority (Sections 115(j) and 116(d)) to establish a fully operational support allowance scheme.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides basic income security to all older persons in Timor-Leste. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry for Social Solidarity
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Timor-Leste
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2008
What was implemented?

The Long-Term Care (LTC) Insurance, implemented by the Government of the Republic of Korea and Ministry of Health and Welfare, is a social insurance scheme for elderly citizens. The scheme provides long-term care benefis to older persons experiencing difficulties with daily routines for six months or longer on account of old age or age-related diseases. The service includes home-based benefits, institution-based benefits and cash benefits when beneficiaries need to care for family members.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older adults and vulnerable community members, especially seniors enrolled in AI-IoT health management services.

What were the results?

In Uiwang City, AI-IoT health management raised healthy behavior improvement rates to 61.8%; in Taean County, mobile health services achieved 100% satisfaction and 78.1% behavior improvement.

How was it developed and implemented?

The program combined pre-visit education, training on digital devices, and AI-IoT/mobile platforms. Local health centers designed tailored “home visits + app-based” models to deliver continuous, community-based health monitoring.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It effectively integrates AI-IoT with community health services, producing measurable health gains among seniors — a scalable model of tech-enabled, inclusive care.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of the Republic of Korea, Ministry of Health and Welfare
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI), implemented by the International Institute for Population Sciences, is a national survey that aims to collect data on disease, mental health, functional health, health care and the social and economic well-being of older persons in India. Data is collected based on five key domains, namely, health, healthcare financing, social networks, economic aspects and older persons welfare programs.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Data users and policy makers

What were the results?

The programme generated a nationally representative longitudinal survey of over 70,000 mid-aged and older adults, strengthening evidence on health, economic, and social well-being of India’s ageing population. It advanced research capacity and informed policy decisions on ageing and elder care (IIPS).

How was it developed and implemented?

Commissioned by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, IIPS led the project in collaboration with Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and USC. Data collection applied stratified multistage sampling, CAPI-based interviews, and biomarker measures, ensuring scientific rigor, cross-country comparability, and public data availability.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It established India’s first nationally representative longitudinal ageing study. Ensures internationally comparable, publicly accessible data that strengthens evidence-based policy and research.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
International Institute for Population Sciences
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
India
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2017- 2018 (Wave 1), 2024 - 2025 (Wave 2)
What was implemented?

The Longitudinal Study of Ageing and Health in the Philippines (LSAHP), implemented by the Demographic Research and Development Foundation, aims to investigate health status and well-being of older persons and to assess the determinants and transitions in health status and overall well-being. Subsequent rounds of the LSAHP aims to improve the understanding behind the trajectory of ageing in the nation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Data users and policy makers

What were the results?

Using a survey sample of 5,985 older Filipinos aged 60+, data was generated identifying widespread noncommunicable diseases, functional decline, and economic vulnerability.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by DRDF with ERIA support, LSAHP used a multi-stage national sampling design. Baseline data were collected in 2018, followed by a second wave in 2023, tracking survival, health, and socioeconomic conditions, including COVID-19 impacts. It is the first nationally representative longitudinal study on aging in the Philippines.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides the first robust longitudinal evidence on ageing in the Philippines, ensuring data-driven policies and programs that enhance well-being and inclusion of older persons.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Demographic Research and Development Foundation
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The Malaysia Disaster Management Reference Handbook provides information for planners and operators have a baseline of knowledge to support disaster management (DM) engagement with Malaysian stakeholders. It specifically mentions older persons as a vulnerable group that requires consideration in planning. It also raises the population ageing needs to be considered in infrastructure planning through age-friendly infrastructure. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

The whole population of Malaysia, including vulnerable groups such as older persons

What were the results?

The handbook outlines the country's hazard exposure, vulnerabilities, and coping capacities, and highlights the role of the National Disaster Management Agency (NADMA) in coordinating national disaster management activities. It also discusses the impact of various hazards, such as floods, landslides, and droughts, and the importance of a shared response approach among government, NGOs, and communities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of the Malaysia Disaster Management Reference Handbook involved a collaborative effort to gather information from public domain resources, local and government sources, and subject matter experts.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The handbook is designed to be informative, relevant, reliable, and useful in understanding disaster management and response. It is an example of including "ageing" in disaster management. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Disaster Management Agency (NADMA) of Malaysia
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The main objective of MARS is to gather micro-level data on people aged 40 years and older. The data provides useful input for policy making and the formulation of National Framework for Healthy and Active Ageing Malaysia towards strengthening social protection system for the country.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Data users and policy makers

What were the results?

The core components of MARS: health, healthcare utilization, health insurance and long-term care; work, employment and retirement; income and consumption; psycho-social; family support and living arrangement.

How was it developed and implemented?

MARS is a sister survey that follows the example of the Health and Retirement Survey based in Michigan. Through the collaboration with the Institute of Social Research (ISR), University of Michigan, ISR provides technical support in terms of questionnaire instrument development, particularly the software required to run the survey through Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI), as well as the training of trainers and field interviewers.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

MARS collects longitudinal data on life histories and experineces of middle-aged and older persons over time and ensures comparability with similar global studies on retirement and ageing research. MARS offers evidence-based recommendations and opportunities and policies to address the trends that emerge in the midst of population ageing in Malaysia.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Social Wellbeing Research Centre (SWRC), University of Malaya
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The Malaysian Population and Family Survey (MPFS) conducted by the National Population and Family Development Board (NPFDB) is a series of surveys carried out every ten years since 1974. The purpose of the MPFS is to prepare time series data in relation to family demography in addition to identifying its correlation with the country’s developmental prospects. In this series, the MPFS-5 has managed to collect information on the inclusive of family life such as marriage, family interaction, health practices, senior life and adolescent sexuality.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Data users and policy makers

What were the results?

From 14,156 households, 4,059 older persons aged 60 years and above were interviewed. Key findings included information on population structure, family life, support for older persons, living arrangements, socail interaction, internet use and loneliness.

How was it developed and implemented?

The implementation of the MPFS-5 was under the supervision of a Project Steering Committee chaired by the Secretary General of the Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development. The Population Division of NPFDB acted as the secretariat for this survey. It was responsible for the implementation of the survey, from fieldwork up to the preparation of the survey report.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Malaysian Population and Family Survey (MPFS-5) is a nationally representative large-scale research conducted by the NPFDB.  The survey is an essential source of reference for policy makers, planners, programme implementers and the general public about current issues on family demography in society. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Population and Family Development Board
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
1974 (initiated)

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.