Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The initiative mobilized retired medical professionals, especially experienced senior experts and veteran traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) doctors, to serve in grassroots healthcare institutions in underserved areas. By offering outpatient services, mentoring, and skills training, the program aimed to enhance primary-level healthcare capacity and address local health needs through intergenerational expertise sharing and expanded talent channels.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary-level health institutions gain stronger clinical capacity and better-trained staff through expert guidance. Retired senior physicians benefit by staying professionally engaged and contributing their experience to public health. Ultimately, the entire health system is strengthened through improved rural healthcare and sustainable knowledge transfer.

What were the results?

Since its launch in 2021, the policy has yielded measurable improvements in primary healthcare services across underserved regions. Retired medical experts were mobilized to provide outpatient care, mentoring, and training in grassroots health institutions, particularly in rural and remote areas to address staffing shortages in the medical sector. This has helped enhance the clinical capacity, professional development, and service accessibility at the primary level. Local governments and health commissions reported increased quality of care and skill transfer in key medical specialties. The initiative has been recognized for addressing regional shortages of experienced medical personnel and narrowing urban-rural healthcare disparities.

How was it developed and implemented?

It identified shortages in specific medical specialties at the grassroots level and matched them with experienced, retired senior medical professionals. Local health commissions coordinated with medical institutions to assign experts to targeted regions. Implementation involved outpatient services, clinical mentorship, and on-site training, focusing on capacity-building in under-resourced areas. The programme emphasized voluntary participation, administrative support, and long-term sustainability through institutional cooperation.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This initiative effectively addresses rural healthcare workforce shortages by leveraging the skills of retired senior medical professionals, promoting intergenerational knowledge transfer. It combines resource optimization with social participation, aligning older persons’ expertise with local needs. Its structured coordination across national and local health bodies ensures scalability and sustainability, making it a replicable model for aging societies seeking to strengthen primary healthcare.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Health Commission of China with local health departments and retired medical experts.
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Old Age Allowance (OAA) Programme was implemented in 1998 by the Bangladesh Government, Cabinet Division and General Economics Division of Bangladesh Planning Commission. This pogramme aimed to provide income scurity for older persons from poor, vulnerable and insecure families, whilst removing th perception of older persons being a burden. This programme is one of the schemes that the Bangladeshi Government has in place to ensure older persons that face poverty are recieving social safety, with plans to bring all older persons under the ’universal social pension scheme’.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The allowance targets vulnerable elderly citizens—men aged 65+ and women aged 62+—from low-income households, especially those who are physically or mentally frail, landless, or socially isolated.

What were the results?

The programme significantly expanded its coverage and benefit level over time, enhancing the income security of older persons in Bangladesh. It contributed to improved well-being and social dignity of beneficiaries, enabling better access to basic needs such as food, healthcare, and personal care.

How was it developed and implemented?

Established under the Social Safety Net Program by the Department of Social Services, the allowance is distributed through local administrative units using a means-tested, multi-tiered selection process involving community and Upazila committees. Funding is allocated each fiscal year through the national budget with implementation overseen by government authorities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It demonstrates scalable, inclusive social protection—targeting the most vulnerable seniors with financial support that restores their dignity, improves access to basic needs, and fosters social inclusion across decades.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Bangladesh, Cabinet Division, General Economics Division (GED) of Bangladesh Planning Commission
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Bangladesh
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1998
What was implemented?

Old People’s Home for 4-Year-Olds, a factual documentary television series on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), brings together older persons and 4-year-olds in a social experiment to explore whether intergenerational contact can improve older persons’ health and well-being. The series includes expert guidance and tests the impact of children’s interactions on the elderly, showing significant improvements in mood, movement and mobility.

Who were the beneficiaries?

older adults living in residential aged care and 4-year-old preschool children. Both generations benefited socially, emotionally, and cognitively.

What were the results?

By 2023, The programme supports over 40 new intergenerational centres nationwide, strengthening social inclusion, enhancing older persons’ well-being, and inspiring new jobs and funding models for community care.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as a structured social experiment, the show brought together experts in child development, geriatrics, and physiotherapy. It introduced shared activities, clinically monitored impacts, and later inspired replication through local organisations and pilot programs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It demonstrated strong, evidence-based intergenerational impact, drove policy change, and inspired replication—bridging entertainment, research, and public engagement.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

A monthly non-contributory cash benefit provided by the Thai government to citizens aged 60 and over, aimed at easing living expenses and ensuring a basic social safety net. The scheme is near-universal. It is for citizens not receiving other significant state-supported pensions or benefits (e.g., military or civil service pensions, salary from government entities, or welfare targeted at specific groups). The allowance is tiered by age. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons over 60 in Thailand

What were the results?

Now over 10 million older citizens are covered. It provides a basic income for older persons. 

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed as part of the government’s social welfare policy to provide a basic income for older persons without pensions or formal retirement benefits. It was introduced in the early 1990s as a small-scale welfare initiative for vulnerable seniors only targeting low-income older persons. In 2009 it was scaled up to cover nearly all Thai citizens aged 60 years or over. It is funded entirely by the national government budget. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides basic universal income security for all older persons in Thailand

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security has policy oversight. It is implemented through local administrative offices which handle registration, verification and distribution
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2009 (introduced)
What was implemented?

Comprehensive national strategy, includes a toolkit for older workers and an extension of an already existing wage subsidy for those seeking jobs aged 65+. Additionally, there is return to work coaching available for those over 50.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older workers aged 50+, with an emphasis on diversity across Māori, Pacific, disabled, and regional communities.

What were the results?

Over 1,000 businesses have used the toolkit to redesign their jobs to work for an ageing workforce. This strategy has contributed to New Zealand having very high labour force participation rates for those over 65 years.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed through  collaboration between governments, community groups and different businesses. It is now a core aspect of employment strategies to tackle ageism as well as skill shortages, as it keeps experienced workers contributing to the economy.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This strategy treats older persons as economic agents, as they have much to contribute to the workforce. It addresses age discrimination while still applying wage subsidies for employers to hire seniors.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Social Development and Office for Seniors
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

Longzhen Senior Care created the One‑Stop Community Elderly Service Program, where trained liaisons help older residents and people with disabilities find and access the goods and services they need, such as adult daycare, home-delivered meals or medical supplies, help with doctors' appointments or legal assistance etc. These liaisons include home‑care staff along with local residents and community leaders from the ‘Longzhen Sunflower Volunteer Team.’ Social workers first assess each person’s situation and then develop an individualized plan to support their health and wellbeing. Through ongoing contact with their liaison, older residents build trust and feel more connected to their community. The liaisons also act as a safety net for noticing changes in health or behaviour. Longzhen Senior Care negotiates discounted rates with service providers and monitors service delivery to ensure it remains high‑quality and compassionate. Local small businesses benefit by increasing sales and reducing marketing costs, and as the age‑friendly network grows, more providers and businesses are applying to join.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons who need daily assistance with various goods and services but do not (yet) want to move into a long-term care facility.

What were the results?

The One‑Stop Community Elderly Service Program operates on a non‑profit basis. Clients pay only for the specific services they use, while more than half of the total service costs are subsidized by the government or covered through a person’s social insurance. Local small businesses providing  the needed goods and services benefit by increasing sales and reducing marketing costs, and as the age‑friendly network grows, more providers and businesses are applying to join.

By 2024, the program had expanded to nine regions and enrolled more than 3,100 older adults, most of whom are over 80 years old.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Many of the older adults catered for by this program live in apartment complexes without elevators resulting in limited mobility. They often also are not comfortable with or have no access to digital technology to order goods and services online. Developing such a liaison program has ensured that "no one is left behind". While it enables older persons to stay in their own home longer, it also is a trust-building exercise if seniors later need to move to the Longzhen Senior Care institution.

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Longzhen Senior Care
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The 2021 policy outlines a comprehensive approach to population aging. It focuses on expanding home- and community-based elderly care, improving healthcare through integrated services and long-term care insurance pilots, and promoting active aging with programs like the national Senior University. The framework also strengthens digital inclusion and legal protections, ensuring offline service options and tackling elder fraud. Finally, it drives growth in the “silver economy” by supporting senior tourism, assistive technologies, and health-focused real estate.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The policy provides guidance to practitioners in relevant Ministries. The ultimate beneficiaries of this policy are older persons across China, particularly those with disabilities, low-income seniors, and childless elderly who require public care support. Rural seniors benefit from improved access to integrated medical and elderly care services at the county level.

What were the results?

The policy has led to significant improvements in China’s elderly care system, including expanded service coverage, better integration of medical and social support, enhanced digital and legal inclusion for older adults, and the emergence of the silver economy as a national development priority.

How was it developed and implemented?

The policy was jointly issued by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council in 2021 after nationwide consultations. It was implemented through a coordinated, multi-level approach involving central ministries and local governments. Key mechanisms included pilot programs (e.g., long-term care insurance), integrated planning (e.g., combining elderly care with health services), and clear timelines and targets for local authorities to follow.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This policy represents a good practice due to its comprehensive and forward-looking design. It adopts a whole-of-government approach, integrating elderly care, healthcare, digital inclusion, legal protection, and economic development. It promotes both top-down planning and local innovation, encourages public-private partnerships, and aligns with international best practices. Its adaptability and strong emphasis on inclusive, people-centered services make it a replicable model for aging societies.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
CPC Central Committee, State Council
Categories:
Older persons and development
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The book provides guidelines for creating a care space from a mutual care perspective. Rather than focusing on one-sided care from caregivers to recipients, it focuses on a mutual approach. Using the concept of pattern language, the project offers caregivers practical guidelines for interacting more effectively with the elderly. For instance, it addresses how to listen to the intentions of care recipients, involve them in daily life, and shape a supportive environment.

Who were the beneficiaries?

This is designed for those who provide in-home care, especially for the elderly with dementia, and also for those who wish to create a warm place for their grandparents.

What were the results?

The guidelines provide evidence-based, actionable advice for caregivers of the elderly. The positive impact of these guidelines has been acknowledged in Japan and has also received media attention.

How was it developed and implemented?

Keio University originally launched a researchproject to apply the concept of "pattern language" from architectural theory to daily life with people with dementia.The project was tested in a practical context to verify its effectiveness. These outcomes have been disseminated through the publication of books and card collections under the title Words to Live Together.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The guidelines provide evidence-based, actionable advice for caregivers of the elderly. The positive impact of these guidelines has been acknowledged in Japan and has also received media attention.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Tomotoko group
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Penal Code and the Vulnerable Adults Act, amended in 2019, was implemented by Singaporean national and local Governments. This act aims to protect vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect or self-neglect and to provide timely and effective interventions. This act is guided by five principles, including: exercising the Act must be for protection of adults from abuse, nelgect or self-neglect; adults with mental capacity can decide how they would like to live; implementation of the act should be as least restrictive of a persosn rights; and the welfare of the peson should be of paramount importance.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All adults aged 18 and above who, due to mental or physical infirmity, disability, or incapacity, are unable to protect themselves from abuse, neglect, or self-neglect.

What were the results?

The Act provided mechanisms for state intervention such as investigations, entry into premises, temporary placement, and court protection orders. It strengthened Singapore’s safety net for vulnerable adults, filling protection gaps where families or communities could not intervene, and enhanced safeguarding efficiency.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Act was developed after public and professional consultations, first read in Parliament in March 2018, passed in May, and implemented in December. Led by the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), it defined “vulnerable adults,” set out intervention and court procedures, and emphasized least-restrictive intervention, prioritizing best interests and autonomy.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It balances family-and community-based care with state intervention, while safeguarding autonomy through least-restrictive, best-interest principles.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

The Philippine Plan of Action for Senior Citizens (PPASC) 2023–2028 is a five‑year national framework that aims to build an inclusive, age‑friendly society by safeguarding the rights, health, and wellbeing of the country’s 9.22 million older persons while empowering them to remain active, productive members of their communities. It strengthens governance and coordination among agencies, promotes seniors’ civic participation and continued employment, enhances access to preventive and age‑responsive healthcare, and creates supportive environments aligned with the WHO age‑friendly cities framework across key domains such as transportation, housing, social inclusion, and community support services. The plan also supports policy reforms—including pension and retirement law amendments and stronger protections against elder abuse—to ensure financial security, dignity, and equal opportunities for Filipino seniors.

Who were the beneficiaries?

It is a clear action plan assigning responsibilities to Government entities and civil society. The eventual beneficiaries will be older persons in the Philippines. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The PPASC 2023–2028 was created through a collaborative, multi‑stakeholder process led by the National Commission of Senior Citizens (NCSC). It was developed in partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO) and key national government agencies, together with other development partners. The process included planning activities, workshops, briefings, and a national validation summit, which ensured technical input, inter‑agency alignment, and stakeholder validation at national level.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a plan with defined expected outcomes and actions. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Commission of Senior Citizens (NCSC)
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Comprehensive policy frameworks)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2024

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.