Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The learning platform offers older adults online learning services based on their interests. It enables them to develop new hobbies and skills, such as playing a musical instrument, painting, and learning about wellness and lifestyle topics. Learners can participate in lessons via live streaming or recorded materials. Programmes like "Study and Travel" go beyond the classic online learning platform by providing users with a space to interact with each other while learning.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Individuals from middle-aged to older adults.

What were the results?

The platform has reached a large number of older adults nationwide. As of 2024, Qianchi had over 10 million registered users, 275,000 of whom were paying subscribers taking lifelong education courses through the provider.

How was it developed and implemented?

The online learning platform is offered by the Quantasing Group, one of the largest providers of online education and lifelong learning. The platform uses simple language and a simplified registration process, providing easier access for the target group. Integrating communication apps like WeChat allows users to create learning communities and interact with each other.

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Beijing Century Wanhe Information Consulting Co., Ltd
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

With the population ageing rapidly, safeguarding the sustainability of the pension system has become a pressing priority. A key challenge arises from the presence of parallel pension schemes, which conflict with the objectives established by the 2009 Pension Reform. Addressing these parallel pensions is essential to uphold fairness, maintain long-term viability, and preserve the financial sustainability of the pension system.
This report evaluates the impact of state-provided retirement benefits on equity and system sustainability and provides recommendations to enhance fairness, support fiscal stability, and promote a coherent and enduring pension system.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policy makers, Parliamentarians 

What were the results?

The report was shared with relevant stakeholders 

How was it developed and implemented?

Stakeholder consultations were conducted, gathering insights from all relevant parties, while comprehensive pension-related data was collected to support the development of the case study.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Basing reform decisions on evidence ensures policies are grounded in facts rather than assumptions. Data-driven analysis also enhances transparency and accountability, making policy and legal changes easier to justify. This case study provided a detailed analysis of the government funded defined benefits. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Maldives Pension Administration office under financial assistance from the World Bank under the COVID-19 Emergency Income Support Project
Categories:
Data and research
Country:
Maldives
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

RCE works to protect the rights, dignity, and quality of life of older people in Kyrgyzstan by strengthening social protection, increasing legal and financial literacy, supporting self‑help initiatives, and advocating for fair public policies affecting the older generation. Through a self-help club model, it promotes day-care for older persons, learning for digital literacy, physical activity, life-long learning, medical check-ups and other activities for older persons. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Kyrgyzstan

What were the results?

Through free legal and informational support, RCE has helped thousands of older persons access pensions, social benefits, and basic services, reducing exclusion and vulnerability. Its self‑help group model has empowered older people to organize, generate income, improve legal and digital literacy, and actively participate in community life, leading to reduced isolation and stronger social cohesion.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Resource Center for the Elderly (RCE) was established in 1991, in the immediate aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union, when Kyrgyzstan experienced a severe economic and social crisis. RCE emerged as one of the first civil society organizations in Kyrgyzstan focused specifically on older people, initially providing humanitarian assistance and basic social support to older persons living in extreme deprivation.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a bottom-up organization using the self-help club model. It provided effective support during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Resource Center for the Elderly
Categories:
Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Kyrgyzstan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
1991
What was implemented?

The Restaurant of Mistaken Orders (注文をまちがえる料理店) is a pop‑up restaurant where servers are people living with dementia or other cognitive conditions. Guests are informed in advance that they may receive a dish different from what they ordered—and that this is entirely intentional. Instead of correcting or hiding mistakes, the restaurant reframes them as a natural part of being human.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People living with dementia and wider society as a change of perceptions benefits all. 

What were the results?

The project led to increased confidence and feeling of acceptance among people living with dementia and promoted meaningful interaction and social engagement. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The Restaurant of Mistaken Orders was developed through an experience‑led social innovation process, originating from personal caregiving experience of the founder, a Japanese television director. It was  designed as a pop‑up, participatory space that normalizes mistakes to promote dignity and social inclusion for people living with dementia.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is an innovative way to change attitudes and perceptions. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Social enterprise
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Older persons and development (Participation of older persons); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2017
What was implemented?

The Constitution of Timor-Leste specifically guarantees the right to social protection by the State to all older citizens of Timor-Leste. Policies have to provide older persons with "opportunities for personal achievement" (Article 20). Further, Article 56 guarantees the right to social protection; Article 56 guarantees the right to health. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

All citizens of Timor-Leste who are guaranteed constitutional rights

What were the results?

The old-age allowance is based on the constitutional right to social protection in the constitution of Timor-Leste.

Decree on living allowances for the elderly and persons with disabilities

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It takes a rights-based approach. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Timor-Leste
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Timor-Leste
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2002
What was implemented?

A programme aimed at enhancing transport infrastructure accessibility for individuals with limited mobility, including older adults. Key measures included adapting transport facilities, services, and infrastructure to make them accessible for people with disabilities and other groups with limited mobility, including older persons. This included public transportation vehicles, railway stations, and social infrastructure, as well as legal reforms.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Individuals with limited mobility, including older adults. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The roadmap was developed as part of Kazakhstan's alignment with the National Plan for the Rights and Quality of Life of People with Disabilities. Implementation followed a phased, data-driven approach, involving nationwide identification of relevant infrastructure objects,  gradual adaptation and compliance checks, annual monitoring cycles, use of digital tools an coordination between national ministries and local authorities. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This policy combines clear targets, systematic monitoring, and public accountability mechanisms. The use of an interactive map and feedback portal promotes transparency and citizen participation, while the scale of coverage (22,000 objects nationwide) ensures both urban and rural inclusion. Alignment with national disability rights frameworks and integration of legal reforms further strengthens sustainability and enforcement.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The programme was led by the Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development, with support from the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection and local executive bodies.
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

Plan 4170/KH‑BVHTTDL sets out the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism’s roadmap for implementing Viet Nam’s National Strategy on Older Persons, with a focus on promoting active ageing, cultural participation, and social inclusion. The plan aims to harness the knowledge, experience, and contributions of older persons in culture, family life, sports, and tourism, while improving their material and spiritual well‑being, particularly for vulnerable groups such as older persons with disabilities, those living in poverty, ethnic minorities, and those without caregivers. Key measures include strengthening communication and awareness‑raising on ageing, supporting older persons’ participation in cultural and artistic activities, reading and heritage preservation, expanding age‑appropriate physical activity and sports, and promoting age‑friendly tourism. The plan also emphasizes preventing violence and abuse through community‑based models—such as Intergenerational Self‑Help Clubs, family happiness clubs, and trusted community support points—and reinforcing the role of older persons in transmitting family values and cultural traditions. Implementation is assigned across MCST departments with requirements for coordination, efficiency, regular monitoring, and adaptation to local contexts, reinforcing the shift from a welfare‑based to an active‑ageing and development‑oriented approach to population ageing in Viet Nam.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The beneficiaries are older persons in Viet Nam. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Plan 4170/KH‑BVHTTDL (2025) was developed as an implementation plan following the formal adoption of Viet Nam’s National Strategy on Older Persons to 2035, with a vision to 2045, which was approved by the Prime Minister under Decision No. 383/QĐ‑TTg on 21 February 2025. The plan translates the national‑level strategy into sector‑specific actions for the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MCST), in accordance with Viet Nam’s policy‑making and planning system. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The plan is a clear sectoral plan to implement the wider National Policy on Ageing. It also includes Intergenerational Self-Help Clubs, thus giving ownership to older persons and promoting intergenerational initiatives. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives, Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Viet Nam
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

Older persons were both victims of as well as actors in emergency response during the 2022 floods in Pakistan. OPAs were instrumental in locating and supporting vulnerable older people in submerged areas of Sindh and Balochistan. With the support of OPAs, older persons received age-sensitive aid such as food, hygiene kits, cash, wheelchairs, and psychosocial support after the floods. In Khairpur, mobile teams distributed essential supplies and provided health screenings and rehabilitation devices to older individuals trapped by floodwaters. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons affected by disasters

What were the results?

Support to approximately 8,000 older people during floods

How was it developed and implemented?

Following the floods in 2010, HelpAge International began forming OPAs in rural communities. As OPAs had already been in place, they were able to provide support in 2022. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Use of grassroot organizations and making older persons actors and not only recipients of support. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Help Age Pakistan as well as Foundation for Ageing and Inclusive Development (FAID)
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters); Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations)
Country:
Pakistan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Safer Environment for Seniors Programme, implemented by the Singaporean Housing and Development Board, aims to incorporate universal design principles in public housing, namely ample seating, to make make them age- and user-friendly for older and disabled persons. This programme additionally involves intergenerational play spaces, namely three-generation fitness and play facilities, for families to enjoy together.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primarily seniors (aged 60/65+) in HDB flats; EASE 2.0 expanded to include public rental housing (about 26,800 more seniors). Additionally, from 2026, eligible private property households with seniors (70,000+ households) will benefit under EASE (Private).

What were the results?

By April 2024, approximately 293,000 households had installed senior‑friendly fittings since 2012, improving mobility and safety within the flat.

How was it developed and implemented?

Built as part of the Home Improvement Programme (HIP) since 2012, featuring heavy government subsidy (up to 95%), resident opt‑in via HIP polling; EASE 2.0 added new fittings (foldable grab bars, lowered kerbs, bidet sprays, HFAD) from April 2024. Implementation combines flat‑level upgrades and precinct‑level enhancements like neighbourhood improvements and assisted‑living facilities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It integrates aging-friendly design into existing housing programmes with strong subsidy and resident participation, delivering tangible safety and mobility improvements for seniors while scaling across public and private housing.

Supporting documents:

The Safer Environment for Seniors Programme, implemented by the Singaporean Housing and Development Board, aims to incorporate universal design principles in public housing, namely ample seating, to make make them age- and user-friendly for older and disabled persons. This programme additionally involves intergenerational play spaces, namely three-generation fitness and play facilities, for families to enjoy together.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Housing and Development Board, Singapore
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2006
What was implemented?

Naju City found that 2 in 10 older persons in the Republic of Korea had experienced an injury from falling over. This can lead to injury-related deaths of elderly people and overall lower quality of life due to pain or disability. This initiative aims to combat this issue by implementing hand rails at the many different senior centers around the city. This initiative is a core component of the Age-Friendly Strategic Plan that began in 2019.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons at risk of falls

What were the results?

Over 1900 hand rails have been installed around Naju City, across 610 senior centers since 2020 when the initiative began.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as a result of the Survey of Living Conditions (2019), which found that 20% of Naju city's seniors had suffered a fall that led to injury. The city created this plan as a result of consultations with local senior citizens.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Responds directly to an issue identified in the community and has a direcl positive impact on its citizens. This initiative increases accessibility to social spaces such as the senior centers, having a positive impact on their mental health and wellbeing.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Naju City Social Welfare Department, collaboration with WHO
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2020

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.