Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 310 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

YADES is a national support programme launched in 2016 by the Ministry of Family and Social Services to help older persons live independently in their homes and communities through bio-psycho-social support, home care, technical assistance, and psychosocial services. YADES operates via municipalities under provincial supervision, funded 60% by the national budget and 40% by local co-financing, with 91 projects implemented between 2016–2024, benefiting over 159,000 older persons. The program emphasizes local ownership, community-based care, technology-driven safety solutions, and sustainability, aiming to improve quality of life, promote active ageing, and strengthen family-focused social work.

What were the results?

As of 2024, the following results were achieved:
91 projects were implemented across 54 municipalities under the program.

  • A total of 64.3 million TL was allocated to fund these initiatives.
  • 159,189 older persons received support, covering 106,069 households.
  • Services included psychosocial support, home care, technical assistance, mobile teams, and coordination centers.
  • The program strengthened local capacity, promoted community-based care, and introduced technology-supported models (e.g., smart monitoring systems for safety).
  • Key achievements: improved quality of life, active ageing, family-focused social work, and sustainability through co-financing and local ownership.
How was it developed and implemented?

The YADES program was developed by Türkiye’s Ministry of Family and Social Services in 2016 as a response to the country’s rapidly ageing population and growing care needs. It was designed as the first large-scale national grant program in the field of ageing, financed through the state budget and implemented by municipalities under provincial supervision.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

YADES promotes community-based care and "ageing in place", allowing older persons to remain in their own homes and cared by communities. It promotes local ownership as it is implemented by municipalities. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Family and Social Services with local governments and minicipalities
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2016 (initiated)
What was implemented?

The national dementia plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran places strong emphasis on supporting caregivers, recognizing them as central to ensuring quality care for people living with dementia. It adopts a family‑ and community‑centred approach, ensuring caregivers receive education, practical tools, and emotional support to manage the complex demands of dementia care.

1. The plan commits to raising awareness and empowering families. It provides structured caregiver education on understanding dementia, communication strategies, behavioural management, and self‑care. Specific materials support caregivers in recognizing symptoms, planning routines, and applying environmental modifications to reduce stress and confusion for the patient. Caregivers receive guidance on using memory aids, maintaining daily structure, managing safety risks, and understanding disease progression. 

2. The plan provides training for non‑professional caregivers, enabling them to deliver basic rehabilitative interventions. This includes support for assisting with activities of daily living, facilitating cognitive exercises, ensuring safe mobility, and incorporating compensatory strategies in daily routines. Caregivers are taught how to support independence while preventing hazards, including fall‑prevention techniques, adaptive feeding, and strategies for managing swallowing difficulties. 

3. Caregivers are supported through multidisciplinary teamwork, where psychologists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech therapists, nurses, and social workers offer counselling, emotional support, practical problem‑solving, and tailored care plans. Social workers help families cope with stress, maintain social inclusion, and access community resources and legal protections. Nurses provide home‑care guidance, respite strategies, and caregiver health assessments. 

4. The plan ensures ongoing follow‑up and monitoring, requiring health workers to track caregiver wellbeing and provide periodic training, home visits, and crisis support. This includes addressing caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, and burnout—acknowledged as critical risks influencing care quality. 

5. The plan integrates caregivers into decision‑making and encourages their participation in rehabilitation programs, support groups, and education sessions, ensuring they are not isolated in their responsibilities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The national dementia plan was developed through a multi‑stage, collaborative process. A Strategic Council, two technical committees, and experts from health, rehabilitation, and social sectors guided its creation. First, a draft was prepared based on existing system structures and international guidance. This draft was circulated to academics, specialists, and relevant organizations for review. Feedback was gathered through group discussions, revised, and integrated into a second and third draft. After multiple expert consultations and revisions, the final version was approved and disseminated to health authorities for implementation.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Health
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2016
What was implemented?

The SLP provides seniors with a pathway to financial independence. There are two distance tracks, each tailored to a seniors physical capability and interests: The Micro-enterprise Development (MD) Track and the Employment Facilitation (EF) Track. On MD Track, seniors are supported as individuals to start small businesses, or they are organized into associations. They are given a grant of up to P15,000 to start, and this is an interest-free grant and not a loan. The programme specifically funds 'Senior-Friendly' ventures such as garment sewing, organic urban gardening, and rice retailing. The EF track is for younger active seniors. They can receive vocational training in technical areas, and get connected to employers in the service and retail sectors.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Eligible Filipino Citizens

What were the results?

In 2025, the programme reached 235,000 vulnerable Filipinos, and served over 1000 senior citizens. The results show that individuals involved have improved standards of living, as they have additional household income and stabilized employment. The psychological impact of the programme remains positive, as it has combatted social isolation and given elders a renewed sense of purpose through productive activities.

How was it developed and implemented?

Since its start in 1993, the programme has evolved from a traditional credit facility into a more modern, grant-based sustainability model utilized today, and the shift was made in 2015. Seniors are identified, and given basic business training, then the grant is released and the micro-enterprise is set up. The DWSD helps the senior to link up with local markets and partners and the business is then monitored for growth. The final stage is where the senior 'graduates' from the programme after achieving a self-sustaining income.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This is a good practice as it is age inclusive, acknowledging that elders have valuable skills that are underutilized in that typical labour market, treating them as active economic contributors rather than passive dependents. Additionally, the programme has high visibility and support among non-beneficiaries, which creates an environment that encourages entrepreneurship in elders. The programme provides a safe and risk-free entry into entrepreneurship and provides a 5 year safety net to ensure long-term success for Filipinos in need.

Supporting documents:

https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/philippines/publication/the-philippines-sustainable-livelihood-program-providing-and-expanding-access-to-employment-and-livelihood-opportunities

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DWSD)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1993
What was implemented?

Telehealth communications and monitoring, implemented by Australian national and local governments, provides patients with consultations through video or telephone instead of face-to-face. This initiative can be used in three ways: remote patient monitoring, store-and-forward and consultations. Between the 13th of March and 31st of July 2022, 118.2 million telehealth services were delivered to 18 million patients.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All Medicare‑eligible Australians—including those in rural, remote, regional areas, and the broader population—benefited. Access expanded to GPs, specialists, allied health professionals, nurse practitioners, midwives, and more.

What were the results?

The programme enabled 16.1 million patients to access over 86.3 million telehealth services, delivered by more than 89,000 providers, with total Medicare rebates of $4.4 billion.

How was it developed and implemented?

Between March and May 2020, in response to COVID‑19, the government rapidly introduced 281 new MBS telehealth items; later, these were extended and formalized into permanent services following audit, stakeholder consultation, and phased policy integration.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It transformed 10 years of healthcare reform into just 10 days, dramatically improving nationwide access to care via telehealth, and enduring through permanence due to its proven scale, equity, and effectiveness.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Ready Senior project is a platform that integrates lifelong learning, marketplace and job matching. The project is based on the concept "Want to Learn, Want to Earn, Want to Work" and aims to help prepare seniors to be self-reliant in their health and income. The Want to Learn section offers four technology courses that cover 18 topics, aiming to help seniors learn digital skills and how to use technology to create a business. Additionally, there are five health courses covering 43 topics in order to help seniors learn how to take care of themselves and others and how they can use this for a career. The programmeme takes place on different platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, a website, and LINE. The Want to Earn section has a marketplace and job board, aiming to provide a trading space between members and the public, and trains seniors in content creation and marketing.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People aged 50+

What were the results?

The Ready Senior project has over 16,000 people following the page as of July 2022, and over 4,000 seniors have participated in the online programmes for Want to Learn. Over 200 seniors have received jobs in areas such as data management, consulting, or volunteer work and many have created online pages for their own businesses.

How was it developed and implemented?

The  Ready Senior project is a response to the fact that Thailand has a very large informal economy, and many seniors are working within this economy. Around half of Thai older people do not have savings to support themselves. This project aimed to empower elderly Thais to learn and work, hopefully lessening the stress on the country's health and long-term care systems. This programme was developed in consultation with Japanese experts.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This project s a good practice as it moves away from seeing seniors as passive recipients of care, rather treating them as productive and self-reliant members of the economy. It treats ageing as a transition to a new life stage rather than a decline, and provides elderly with the tools to support themselves.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ageing Business and Care Development Center (ABCD Center) and the Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy (Thammasat University)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment, Life-long learning)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Act on the Prevention of Elder Abuse and Support for Caregivers (Act No. 124 of 2005) establishes a comprehensive framework to prevent elder abuse, protect elderly victims, and support caregivers. It defines elder abuse—including physical, psychological, sexual, financial abuse, and neglect—whether committed by caregivers or care‑facility staff. Municipalities must provide consultation, guidance, and immediate protective measures, including safety checks, temporary placement, and coordinated responses with designated support personnel. Mandatory reporting applies when an elderly person’s life or physical safety is at risk, and confidentiality protections ensure reporters are not identified. Municipalities may enter homes for investigation and request police assistance. The Act also requires support and burden‑reduction services for caregivers, establishment of inter‑agency cooperation systems, and staff training in facilities to prevent abuse. Prefectures must publish annual data on abuse cases. Additional provisions address prevention of financial exploitation, promotion of adult guardianship, and penalties for breaching confidentiality or obstructing investigations. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons, particularly those at risk of abuse

What were the results?

Since the Act came into force in 2006, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) has collected and published nationwide data every year on elder‑abuse reports, characteristics of cases, and municipal responses.
 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Japan’s elder‑abuse prevention law is good practice because it provides clear definitions of all forms of abuse and mandates rapid municipal action to protect victims. It requires immediate reporting when an elderly person’s safety is at risk and protects reporters’ identities. Municipalities must ensure safety checks, temporary protection, investigations, and coordinated multi‑agency responses. The Act also supports caregivers through counseling, advice, and burden‑reduction measures, recognizing caregiver stress as a risk factor. It strengthens oversight of care facilities, mandates staff training, protects whistleblowers, addresses financial exploitation, promotes adult guardianship, and ensures cooperation across government and community organizations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Japan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2005
What was implemented?

A national grant programme that implements the Better Later Life strategy at a local level and provides funding for two areas. The first is age-friendly planning, conducting community needs assessments and developing formal age-friendly plans. For example, ensuring local infrastructures are age-friendly by consulting with elderly residents. The second area is funding age-friendly initiatives such as community-led projects to address social gaps, intergenerational programmes and digital inclusion workshops for ethnic groups. There are also social connection events to target loneliness in rural areas. The fund offers small grants from NZD $5,000 to $15,000, enabling local councils and small NGO's to bypass any barriers they may encounter in terms of budget to improve the livelihood of older persons in their area.

Who were the beneficiaries?

pplicants are the main beneficiaries: local councils, community groups, NGOs. The local elderly population are the ultimate beneficiaries, as they benefit from infrastructure improvements and any events created.

What were the results?

Across 2018 and 2023, there were 65 small-scale grants implemented across New Zealand, many local councils have moved from having no senior strategy to having integrated age-friendly plans.

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed using the WHO Eight Domains of Age-Friendliness as a guideline to align with the WHO global standards, as well as local elderly needs. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme empowers local communities to solve issues with low cost intervention. It builds a partnership between local councils and the community, creating events and projects that are culturally relevant and specifically address the issues that arise for the elderly in each community.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Managed by the Office for Seniors (Te Tari Kaumātua), locally implemented at multiple levels (local council, community, organizations, registered non-profits)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The All-Russian Selection of best practices for older persons, organized by the ANO ’National Priorities’, is a competetition aimed at selecting, developing and spreading the concept of active longevity across the Russian Federation. The project promotes best practices in five areas, including: health lifestyle, active life, education and employment, medical and social care and practice for men aged 60+. It enocurages older persons to lead healthy lives, engage in society through volunteering, pursue further education and employment and recieve the necessary medical and social support.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Beneficiaries included older adults across Russia, as the contest recognized and promoted community-led initiatives enhancing active ageing—particularly those addressing culture, health, education, employment, volunteering, and social care.

What were the results?

As of 2024, over 3.5 million older Russians and around 190,000 silver volunteers were engaged in active ageing programmes across multiple areas of society.

How was it developed and implemented?

Organized by ANO “National Priorities” with support from the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection, the contest solicited submissions via Smarteka, evaluated them by a panel, and awarded funding, recognition, and dissemination support to winning practices for regional replication.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It systematically identifies, validates, and scales community-driven active ageing initiatives, rewarding innovation while embedding older adults as contributors to social development and policy.

Supporting documents:
  • https://xn--80aapamcavoccigmpc9ab4d0fkj.xn--p1ai/news/podvedeny-itogi-vserossiyskogo-otbora-luchshikh-praktik-aktivnoe-dolgoletie-2023/

 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
ANO “National Priorities”
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Bright Life Foundation implements a comprehensive assistance programme for older people that combines material, social, and emotional support. The programme provides regular food packages, medicines, accompaniment to medical appointments, assistance with everyday needs, and the distribution of gift sets for holidays. In addition, the organisation conducts social and cultural activities and mobilises volunteers to provide personal attention and companionship. The programme also extends to institutional settings, where the fund supports and organizes activities in residential care facilities for older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are older people, especially lonely pensioners living independently who experience difficulties meeting basic needs or accessing services. The fund also supports older persons living in residential institutions for the elderly, including homes for older persons under its care.

What were the results?

The fund supports approximately 250 older people living independently and 420 residents in three residential care institutions. Beneficiaries receive regular food assistance, medicines, and practical support, along with social interaction and participation in organized activities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The initiative was developed as part of the foundation’s long‑term charitable work and relies on a combination of donations, volunteer engagement, and partnerships with care institutions. Implementation involves identifying beneficiaries in need, organizing logistics for food, medicine, and accompaniment, and coordinating volunteers to ensure timely and consistent support. The programme also integrates storytelling and regular communication to maintain public engagement and transparency.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The integrated approach supports not only physical wellbeing but also dignity and social inclusion in older age. It addresses both material needs and social isolation, combines home-based and institutional support, and highlights the human stories of older persons to sustain empathy and accountability.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Bright Life Foundation
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination, Combatting ageism); Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

The Community Network for Services in Singapore, implemented by the Government and Agency for Integrated Care (AIC), aims to promote active ageing, provide befriending services for seniors living alone and integrate health and social support for seniors in need. Correspondingly, this network unites stakeholders to support older persons, for instance, health systems, voluntary welfare organizatons and grassroot organizations.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Socially isolated and low-income seniors aged 60+, especially those living alone in public rental housing without caregiver support.

What were the results?

The programme supports over 2,500 vulnerable seniors through Care Close to Home (C2H) befriending and assisted-living services, enabling them to age in place with stronger social connection, reduced isolation, and improved functional independence.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Ministry of Health assumed responsibility for aged care planning from the Ministry of Social and Family Development in 2018. It piloted integrated care models like C2H in rental blocks, deploying care teams, training volunteers, and working with Senior Activity Centres (SACs) to offer home visits, social engagement, and coordinated services.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It bridges medical and social care gaps, empowers ageing in place, and ensures timely, community-based support tailored to seniors’ needs.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Governement, Agency for Integrated Care (AIC)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2018

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.