Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The Coalition of Services of the Elderly (COSE), implemented by HelpAge International in the Philippines, is a non-governmental organization that has worked with older persons since 1989. The aim of this initiative is to strengthen older persons organizations (OPAs), enhance the well-being of older persons and encourage older persons to lead efforts in promoting intergenerational solidarity and gender equality.

Who were the beneficiaries?

COSE works with older Filipinos, especially those who are poor, marginalized, or excluded—empowering them via community-based organizations, advocacy, and disaster response programs.

What were the results?

COSE helped form over 850 Older Persons’ Organizations (OPOs) across 21 provinces, federated in 2006 into COPAP. In response to Typhoon Haiyan, COSE and HelpAge piloted mobile healthcare services benefiting older adults in Leyte and Samar for over a decade.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed with HelpAge’s facilitation, COSE grew through grassroots organizing, advocacy for senior rights, and partnerships with local and national agencies. Program expansion included OPO creation, mobile health outreach during disasters, livelihoods projects, and policy advocacy.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It’s a community-driven, scalable model that builds elder-led organizations, provides innovative outreach (e.g. mobile healthcare), and translates advocacy into measurable institutional changes—it empowers older people as active contributors rather than passive recipients.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
HelpAge International
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
1989
What was implemented?

The Code of Accessiblity in the Built Environment, implemented by the building and contruction authority in Singapore, informs requirements and provides guidelines pertaining to accessibility and refines exising requirements to allow more equitable access for older and disabled individuals. This includes implementing more accessible parking lots in hospitals and short ramps runs for wheelchair users.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Persons with disabilities, seniors, nursing mothers, and families with young children.

What were the results?

Since 2019, more than 80% of new and altered buildings have complied with the Accessibility Code, strengthening inclusion and ensuring safer, barrier-free environments.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Code was reviewed by a tripartite committee of government agencies, industry experts, academics, and disability service groups. After broad consultation, it was officially gazetted and made mandatory from January 2020.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a good practice because it was co-created with stakeholders, based on universal design, and shows high compliance and measurable social inclusion outcomes.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Building and construction authority, Singapore
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

The ’Committed to becoming more age-friendly: Taiping’ policy, implemented by the local Malaysian Government, aims to increase the quality of urban living for older persons and those with disabilities. This intiaitive includes development plans for an aged-friendly neighbourhood, implementation of low-vibration buses and a project focused on hospitality for older and disabled persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries were older persons (60+), as well as persons with disabilities and the wider community, supported through safe, accessible, and inclusive urban environments.

What were the results?

The programme established baseline assessments and action strategies, introduced universal design, launched an electric senior/disability-friendly bus (donated by JICA), and improved accessibility in public facilities, laying the foundation for a safe, inclusive, and age-friendly Taiping.

How was it developed and implemented?

It was co-led by Malaysia’s Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development, the Perak State Government, and Taiping Municipal Council with UNDP support. Universiti Putra Malaysia served as consultant, and multi-stakeholder meetings, research, and public consultations shaped the framework.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It integrates WHO guidelines with local needs, backed by government–UNDP partnership, creating inclusive infrastructure and participatory planning that directly benefits older citizens.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local government
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The CHSP provides home-based aged care services to help older people continue living independently and safely at home and in their community. CHSP providers help with services including personal care, transport, and preparing meals. CHSP also includes provisions for carer breaks and respite.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons requiring care and support in the home

What were the results?

The consolidation of existing programmes and sources of in-home support for older persons.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Australian Government designed the CHSP as part of a broader set of changes to the aged care system. The CHSP was implemented to consolidate former programmes for aged age. The following Commonwealth-funded programs were consolidated into the CHSP from 
1 July 2015: 
• Commonwealth Home and Community Care (HACC) Program 
• planned respite services under the National Respite for Carers Program (NRCP) 
• Day Therapy Centres (DTC) Program 
• Assistance with Care and Housing for the Aged (ACHA) Program. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Support for low-earning families, pensioners and those already receving government subsidies and assistance.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Services Australia
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

Commonwealth Rent Assistance offers financial help to eligible people, including pensioners and families getting a Centrelink payment, who pay rent and are not public renters. It helps subsidize rental costs to enable older persons and families to keep up with rental costs and remain housed independently. To qualify, individuals must receive an eligible income support payment such as the Age Pension, Disability Support Pension, JobSeeker, or Youth Allowance.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons who are renters, and others receiving a Centrelink payment, or those who receive more than the base rate of the family tax benefit.

What were the results?

CRA expands support for Australians and eases living costs, especaially in the wake of the COVID‑19 pandemic. In 2020, the number of CRA income unit recipients and CRA expenditure peaked due to high unemployment and the temporary changes to social security that allowed more people to access income support during the height of the COVID‑19 pandemic.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Government is funding a workforce of care finders to provide face-to-face support to help people navigate and access aged care. The programme was developed in response to a recommendation of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Support for low-earning families, pensioners and those already receving government subsidies and assistance.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Services Australia
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
1985
What was implemented?

The Long-Term Care programme allows elderly who are bedbound or homebound to have care for up to 8 hours a week at their home. The care is given partly by paid caregivers and partly by trained volunteers. Caregivers receive 70+ hours of training on the care of elderly, drug administration, medication management, rights of elderly people, and ADL support (bathing/dressing). This programme supports ageing in place and has significantly reduced the reliance on institutional care that is costly.

Who were the beneficiaries?

This programme supports older persons who are bed/home bound in Thailand over 60 years old. 

What were the results?

Over 100,000 seniors had been given care by 2018 (2 years after the programme began). The Long-Term Care programme has been a great success, and has been expanded over the years.

How was it developed and implemented?

Thailand’s community‑based long‑term care (CB‑LTC) programme for older persons was developed through a gradual, learn‑by‑doing process over more than a decade, driven by rapid population ageing, declining family caregiving capacity, and the high cost of institutional care. Rather than creating a new system from scratch, Thailand built on existing universal health coverage, local government structures, and community health volunteers, supported by research, advocacy, and pilot projects—many informed by technical cooperation with Japan. After years of local experimentation, a national CB‑LTC pilot was launched in 2016 and scaled up incrementally, with the National Health Security Office leading financing and coordination through local administrations. The programme prioritises home‑based, integrated health and social care for dependent older persons, supports family caregivers, and enables ageing in place, making it a widely cited good practice for affordable and scalable long‑term care in middle‑income countries.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Works with the community, allows older persons to age in place, in turn respecting their needs and allows them to live a fuller life.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Health Security Office, Government of Thailand, Local governments, Local health and social services organizations
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2016, expanded in 2018
What was implemented?

Community Care Apartments (CCAs) are a public assisted-living housing model that integrate senior-friendly homes with on-site care services and community support. Designed for Singaporeans aged 65 and above, the apartments include age-friendly features such as wheelchair-accessible bathrooms, grab bars and barrier-free layouts. Residents receive a mandatory basic service package, including 24-hour emergency monitoring and response, basic health checks, social activities and care coordination. Optional care services, such as housekeeping, meal delivery and personal care, can be added according to individual needs, enabling older persons to age independently within the community.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Singapore citizens aged 65 years and above who wish to live independently while having access to integrated care and community support, particularly those with existing or anticipated care needs.

What were the results?

Community Care Apartments expanded Singapore's continuum of housing options for older persons by integrating housing with scalable care services. Following the successful launch of the first development in Harmony Village @ Bukit Batok, additional Community Care Apartments have been introduced in Queenstown, MacPherson and other towns, reflecting growing demand for assisted living within public housing.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Community Care Apartments were jointly developed by the Ministry of National Development, the Ministry of Health and the Housing & Development Board to support ageing in place. The model combines age-friendly housing design with a mandatory basic care package and optional care services that can be scaled according to residents' needs. Community care providers deliver health monitoring, emergency response, social activities and care coordination, while HDB integrates these apartments into mixed residential developments to encourage social inclusion and intergenerational interaction. The initiative has been progressively expanded to additional housing projects following the successful pilot.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Community Care Apartment model demonstrates how public housing can be integrated with community care services to support ageing in place. By combining senior-friendly housing, scalable care services and opportunities for social participation within mainstream public housing developments, the model promotes independence, reduces institutionalization and provides a practical and replicable approach for ageing societies.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Housing & Development Board (HDB), Ministry of National Development (MND) and Ministry of Health (MOH), with appointed community care providers
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Hua Mei Centre for Successful Ageing, managed by the Tsao Foundation, provides community care management services that are team-led by nursing and social work professionals to older persons, particularly those at-risk. The Hua Mei Community Care Management Services (HMCCMS), aims to ensure clients have access to services and assures that their care plan is sustainable and optimizes their health and well-being. The service provides complete assessments of older persons health, social and emotional needs, alongside advice on how they can take care of themselves and develop sustainable care plans alongside their families.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are community-dwelling seniors in Whampoa, particularly older adults with higher health or social care needs.

What were the results?

The programme supports vulnerable seniors through integrated care management by nursing and social work teams, strengthening care coordination, improving holistic well-being, and promoting early risk detection and self-care. It advances the bio-psycho-social (BPS) model of ageing and community empowerment.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by Tsao Foundation with grassroots partners, Care Management began with a 2014 community needs survey and moved into the “system development” phase in 2015. It integrates a Patient-Centred Medical Home with long-term care and behavioural interventions. Professional nurses, social workers, and volunteers deliver services in the community, supported by structured referral pathways linking community centres with healthcare institutions.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It integrates nursing, social work, and community resources into a seamless care system, and enhances accessibility and continuity of care while fostering community participation and empowerment.

View More
Who implemented it?
Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Civil society
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
1993-present
What was implemented?

Macao, China established a community-based long-term care service network to support older persons with health conditions, frailty or functional limitations while enabling them to continue living in the community. The service system includes home care and support services, home nursing care, day care services, rehabilitation, dementia care, meal delivery, personal care, escort services, counselling and community activities. Individual care plans are developed for frail older persons according to their care needs, while respite and support services are also provided for family caregivers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons with frailty, chronic illnesses, disabilities or functional limitations who require community-based care and support, as well as their family caregivers.

What were the results?

The programme has established a territory-wide community care network offering home care, day care and rehabilitation services through multiple service centres across Macao. By integrating health and social care services and working with non-governmental organisations, the initiative has strengthened ageing in place and reduced reliance on institutional care for older persons with long-term care needs.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Social Welfare Bureau developed the programme through partnerships with non-governmental organisations to provide coordinated community-based long-term care services. Service providers assess applicants' functional status and care needs before developing individual care plans. Depending on the level of need, older persons may receive home care, nursing care, rehabilitation, dementia support, escort services or day care. Government funding, professional supervision and a network of community service centres support consistent service delivery across Macao, China. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The initiative demonstrates an integrated model of community-based long-term care that combines health, rehabilitation and social support through strong government–NGO collaboration. By providing individualized care while enabling older persons to remain in their own homes and communities, it offers a practical and replicable approach to ageing in place for rapidly ageing societies.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Social Welfare Bureau, in partnership with government-funded non-governmental organisations providing community services for older persons
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Macao, China
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2016-2025
What was implemented?

Nuroniylar maskani centres are established across urban and district areas in Uzbekistan following national initiatives to improve social support for elders. They are designed as comfortable, attractive spaces where older people can gather, socialize, and participate in community life.

They are often rebuilt or renovated through government programmes such as the Tashabbusli budget (Participatory Budget) initiative, reflecting strong community involvement and local government engagement. They serve as hubs for social activities, cultural and educational events, and health and well-being initiatives for older persons. 

 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Uzbekistan

How was it developed and implemented?

With Presidential Decree of 28 December 2016 on social support of older persons facilities were systematically updated and expanded. Support to older persons was integrated into local government initiatives by the mahallas. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The centres provide a dedicated age-friendly space for older persons, they strengthen community cohesion and intergenerational ties. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government and mahallas (self-governing units)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Uzbekistan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
Emerged in late 1980s, expanded after 2016

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.