Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The Foundation for Older Persons' Development (FOPDEV) is a national network of Thai grassroots NGOs working with and for disadvantaged older persons, particularly in Northern Thailand's indigenous communities. Its community-based home care service program encourages independent living for older people and lightens the burden on family caregivers by providing volunteer home-helpers to older people with physical or emotional limitations. The program also builds the capacity of the volunteers club so that they can deliver services directly to older people. The volunteers focus on basic health support, rights information, and social assistance to older people with limited mobility or family support - including in indigenous languages. Buddy HomeCare is a social enterprise created as an extension of FOPDEV's Home Care Service. The Buddy HomeCare model is anchored in a mobile health management platform that links community‑based care with digital monitoring. The system supports individualized care planning, routine health screening, and the documentation of health and daily‑living support activities. By enabling data entry from a range of stakeholders — including trained caregivers, volunteers, older persons, and families — the platform facilitates ongoing health surveillance and flags emerging risks through threshold‑based alerts. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Vulnerable older persons, including in remote and indigenous communities, as well as youth training as caregivers.

What were the results?

Buddy HomeCare's mobile app-based system for healthcare monitoring is a key tool in a program that provides impoverished youth with training as caregivers, while also providing older people with cost-effective, high-quality homecare services.

How was it developed and implemented?

Buddy HomeCare (BHC) is a social enterprise operated by FOPDEV, developed from earlier volunteer‑based homecare programmes and formally scaled from around 2015 onwards.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The dual approach of addressing ageing in place and youth unemployment benefits underprivileged communities. While there are other examples of healthcare monitoring systems, the Buddy HomeCare  has a unique social enterprise approach serving both paying customers and low-income older persons and families.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Foundation for Older Persons' Development (FOPDEV) and Buddy HomeCare Social Enterprise
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2015
What was implemented?

The Bueng Yitho Senior Recreation and Rehabilitation Complex is a municipality-led initiative that combines health promotion, rehabilitation, social participation and community support for older persons. The initiative forms part of Bueng Yitho Municipality's vision of becoming a model city characterized by healthy older persons, strong communities and integrated health services. The municipality operates a Medical and Rehabilitation Centre providing outpatient care, chronic disease management, physical therapy and traditional medicine services, alongside a dedicated Senior Recreation and Rehabilitation Centre that organizes social, cultural and community-based activities for older persons. The approach seeks to support healthy, active and socially connected ageing within the community.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Bueng Yitho Municipality

What were the results?

Evidence available from the municipal website indicates that the municipality has established dedicated infrastructure and services for older persons, including a Senior Recreation and Rehabilitation Centre and a Medical and Rehabilitation Centre offering physical therapy and chronic disease services. The municipality continues to organize activities promoting health, social participation and well-being among older persons, including cultural and religious events.

The initiative demonstrates the successful decentralization of public health responsibilities to the local government level, supported by technical cooperation with international partners such as the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Through the transfer of authority and the provision of technical expertise, the municipality was able to develop a range of services tailored to local needs. The arrangement also enhanced management flexibility, enabling the municipality to respond more quickly and effectively to the evolving needs and demands of the community.

How was it developed and implemented?

The practice was developed by Bueng Yitho Municipality as part of a broader local development strategy emphasizing healthy ageing, community well-being and accessible health services. The municipality established integrated facilities that combine medical services, rehabilitation and social activities for older persons. Implementation is undertaken through municipal health, rehabilitation and social welfare structures, including the Bueng Yitho Medical and Rehabilitation Centre and the Senior Recreation and Rehabilitation Centre. Activities include health services, rehabilitation support, recreational programmes, religious and cultural activities, and community engagement opportunities for older residents.

 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice illustrates how local governments can integrate health care, rehabilitation and social participation within a community-based framework for older persons. By combining medical services, rehabilitation support and opportunities for recreation and social engagement, the initiative addresses multiple dimensions of healthy ageing. The model is embedded within municipal structures, helping to promote accessibility and continuity of services. The establishment of dedicated facilities for older persons demonstrates local commitment to age-responsive development and may offer lessons for other municipalities seeking to strengthen community-based support for ageing populations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Bueng Yitho Municipality (เทศบาลเมืองบึงยี่โถ)
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Long-term care); Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The Government of China released the 2021 National Aging Development Report, providing a comprehensive overview of the country’s aging landscape, including demographic data on the number of older persons and dependency ratios. The report also outlined current policies, fiscal investment strategies, and multisector coordination efforts aimed at strengthening China’s aging-care system. These actions support enhanced planning, funding, and oversight in response to rapid population aging.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Direct beneficiaries of the report are policymakers, researchers, and service providers who benefit from improved access to reliable data, which support evidence-based planning, monitoring, and service delivery related to population ageing. The ultimate goal is that older persons benefit from more effective policies that affect older persons.

What were the results?

The data provided in the Statistical Bulletin served as a foundation for future aging-related research and international reporting commitments.

How was it developed and implemented?

The bulletin was jointly developed and published by the National Health Commission, the National Working Commission on Aging, and the National Bureau of Statistics. Data was collected through national surveys and administrative records across sectors such as healthcare, civil affairs, and social security. The process involved coordination among ministries, data harmonization, and standardized reporting formats to ensure accuracy and comparability. The final report was released on the official government portal for public and institutional access.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice demonstrates inter-agency coordination, data transparency, and evidence-based policy support. By systematically publishing key statistics on older persons, it ensures informed decision-making and monitoring of aging-related programs. The consistent, public release of such bulletins also fosters accountability and enables researchers, policymakers, and the public to track progress in elderly care and social protection.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Health Commission, National Working Committee on Aging, National Bureau of Statistics of China
Categories:
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

Ulfaaveri Raastaa is a wellness initiative that aims to help isolated seniors reintegrate into active community life. More specifically they targeted both seniors living in homes for people with special needs and seniors isolated in rural areas.  These sessions covered topics of healthy diets, exercise routines, and mental health. The sessions were interactive, aiming to combat high loneliness levels in the Maldives. The programme pairs seniors with young volunteers, aiming to ensure traditional knowledge is passed down generations. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Senior citizens who are institutionalized in homes or who are isolated

What were the results?

Over 1000 senior citizens have graduated from the wellness sessions, and they showed high engagement rates. The program has also expanded across 11 different atolls.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed due to high levels of loneliness of older persons in the Maldives. Many older persons were in state care due to lack of social skills or lack of family support rather than an illness or disability. This program was developed to help them gain the necessary skills to re-enter society.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme addresses key issues that many older persons in Maldives face: isolation and institutional dependency. The programme focuses on social reintegration rather than solely medical needs. Additionally, it highlights the importance of intergenerational initiatives, to ensure precious knowledge is passed down to the younger populations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Social and Family Development
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Maldives
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The Care Centers Act, implemented by the Malaysian Government and Ministry of Social Welfare, aimed to regulate the establishment of care centres, and the registration, control and inspection of care centres and for matters connected.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The Act benefits users of care centres across demographics—including children, persons with disabilities, juveniles, and senior citizens—by ensuring that care facilities (both residential and day care) operate under proper standards, control, and inspection.

What were the results?

The Act established mandatory registration, inspections, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure operational standards and protect vulnerable groups. As a result, registered care centres operate under clearer regulatory oversight, reducing the risk of unregulated or substandard facilities. For instance:

How was it developed and implemented?

Drafted by Malaysia’s Ministry of Social Welfare, the Act was passed by Parliament in 1993 and published in the Gazette the same year. Implementation began via phased enforcement: registration requirements, issuance of certificates, inspections, and penalties for unregistered operations—empowered through authorized social welfare officers and the Director General.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It establishes a clear, enforceable regulatory framework mandating registration and oversight of care centres, thereby safeguarding vulnerable populations through structured enforcement and accountability.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Malaysia Ministry of Social Welfare
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1993
What was implemented?

The care finder program provides support for vulnerable older people to interact with My Aged Care, access aged care services and access other relevant supports in the community.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons who require support accessing and understanding aged care services

What were the results?

The care finder programme offers tailored, intensive support and improves outcomes for people in the care finder target population, as well as strengthening integration between the health, aged care and other systems at the local level in the context of the care finder program.  

How was it developed and implemented?

The Government is funding a workforce of care finders to provide face-to-face support to help people navigate and access aged care. The programme was developed in response to a recommendation of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Added support for older persons navigating communication and language barriers, difficulty processing information due to cognitive decline, reluctance to engage with a need for support, and reluctance to engage with government services.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Care Provider Allowance is a provision under Regulation 8A(1) of the Old Age and Disability Pensions Regulations. It expands the categories of disabilities eligible for support and provides a monthly allowance to individuals who assume caregiving responsibilities for older persons or persons with disabilities.

The allowance offers financial assistance of $250 per month to support caregiving responsibilities. It also strengthens accountability by requiring care providers to formally accept responsibility, with legal action possible if neglect occurs.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Care providers who provide necessary daily care for persons with disabilities and/or older persons

How was it developed and implemented?

The allowance was incorporated through regulatory amendment and requires medical certification of disability based on guidelines issued by the Director-General of Medical Services. Care providers must sign a declaration acknowledging their caregiving duties, ensuring oversight and compliance.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice provides targeted financial support to caregivers while ensuring protection for vulnerable older persons and persons with disabilities. The combination of medical certification, official guidelines, and legal accountability ensures structured and responsible caregiving.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Brunei Darussalam
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
Brunei Darussalam
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Career Revive resources have been developed for businesses through the learnings of the Career Revive program, which ran from July 2019 to June 2023. The resources are a comprehensive and practical set of tools that support businesses to attract and retain women returning to work after a career break. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Businesses who seek to attract talent and reemploy women returning to work following a career break.

What were the results?

The development of a range of resources for businesses, including a self-assessment questionnaire to identify actions that could improve your workplace for women; an inclusive culture toolkit to create an inclusive workplace for women by identifying and addressing bias; an inclusive recruitment practices toolkit to improve job ads and practices, such as avoiding gendered language and using alternative application methods; a job crafting toolkit to allow your employees to personalise their role; a parental leave toolkit that discusses workplace policies that help parents balance their work and home lives; and a workplace flexibility toolkit to support diverse and innovative workforces.

How was it developed and implemented?

The toolkit resources were extracted from the learning and experiences of the Career Revive programme. The original programme was designed by the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations in collaboration with external management consulting firms (KPMG), and funded by the Australian Government.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Toolkit supporting inclusive employment practices aimed at enabling flexible transitions for women as they successfully reenter the workforce.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The programme provides personalized support for jobseekers with various skillsets has helped individuals change industries or re-enter employment after periods of joblessness. Career Transition Assistance facilitators work with jobseekers on building resumes, practicing for interviews, and identifying professional goals. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Jobseekers aged 45 and older.

What were the results?

Between 1 July 2019 and 31 March 2021, 11,085 people were referred to the programme, of whom 75% (8,407) commenced the course.  71% of participants reported completing the course, and the programme prepared testimonials from individuals who had successfully secured employment after completing the course. 

How was it developed and implemented?

This programme was developed by the Government of Australia to address the specific challenges faced by older jobseekers and to improve tailored employment services for people aged 45+.  As part of Workforce Australia, the programme was delivered by local employment and skills organisations. The programme was rolled out nationally following a trial based in 5 regions: Adelaide South, South Australia; Ballarat, Victoria; Central West, New South Wales; Perth North, Western Australia; and Somerset, Queensland. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The programme promotes employment for relatively older job-seekers and is free of charge for eligible individuals. It helps older workers transition into new occupations by identifying transferable skills and building competencies needed in modern workplaces.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Australia, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The Care Allowance scheme, implemented by the Department of Labor and Welfare in Mongolia, is a financial scheme taregeted at family members that care for older persons in need of permanent care and to those taking care of older family members. This scheme provides an allowance of MNT 84,500 per month,which was determined by the government as it aligns with the minimum living standard.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Beneficiaries include retired or near‑retirement professionals (senior specialists and veterans) aged typically 60+, who gain meaningful engagement and supplemental income, while younger generations benefit from mentorship and advisory support.

What were the results?

By 2021, the programme engaged 884 senior professionals in advisory roles and supported 442 with repayable financial assistance, leading to over 1,390 new job placements. It enhanced older persons’ income security, promoted self-employment, and strengthened institutional capacity through intergenerational knowledge transfer.

How was it developed and implemented?

The program was structured under the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, using national and local budgets. It integrates senior professionals into advisory and income-generating roles via structured grants and support mechanisms, including repayable funding and employment generation schemes.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It transforms ageing into an asset—leveraging accumulated expertise of seniors to foster advisory capacity, create jobs, and honor lifelong contributions, while aligning with both social protection and active ageing goals.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Labor and Welfare
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Mongolia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2020

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.