Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

AgeNet international in Tajikistan, implemented by Civil society, focuses on three streams (A) Humanitarian Assistance Programmes, (B) Development Programmes through Resocialisation, and (C) Promotion of Gerontology Services Development. These efforts are set to collectively enhance the well-being, social inclusion and support systems for older persons in line with active ageing and inclusive development goals.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Socially vulnerable older persons in Tajikistan, including those living alone, with disabilities, or affected by crises.

What were the results?

The programme supports 2,000 vulnerable seniors, strengthening community inclusion, enhancing well-being, and advancing gerontology services through training and curriculum integration at TSMU.

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed through civil society initiative, where 21–35 organizations from Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan collaborated to form AgeNet International. Implementation involved: Establishment of the Central Asia Gerontology Centre in Tajikistan as a key regional node for gerontology services, methodological development, and coordination HelpAge International.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This initiative, led by civil society across Central Asia, fosters regional collaboration and peer learning, driven by NGOs and gerontological actors rather than solely government mandates. It integrates humanitarian aid, resocialisation programmes, and gerontology development to address older persons’ well-being.

View More
Who implemented it?
Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Civil society
Categories:
Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations)
Country:
Tajikistan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2005
What was implemented?

The start-up "Hyodol AI" from the Republic of Korea initiated an $1,800 AI-powered companion doll to combat loneliness among the country's ageing population. By using Large Language Models (LLMs) to hold conversations and provide emotional support to seniors, dolls provide companionship and offer medication reminders, health coaching, music, quizzes, and exercise sessions, while built-in sensors detect falls or inactivity and alert caregivers through a companion app and web monitoring platform for remote oversight. Local governments have embraced the initiative, planning to distribute around 7,000 units to elderly residents and dementia patients. In locations, such as Cheongsong County, where over 41% of residents are 65 or older, piloted the programme with plans to scale up based on results. Trials involving more than 9,000 users showed reduced depression and improved medication adherence. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons suffering from loneliness

What were the results?

The initial trial period of 9000 units has shown promising results including decrease in depression levels and better medication adherence. In the addition to the empirical evidence-base necessary for further project development, the integration of the robot-dolls also offers a better foundation for understanding robot-human relationship in the health-care context. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Hyodol AI built the companion doll around Large Language Model technology, integrating conversational AI with practical caregiving features like medication reminders, health coaching, and safety sensors, paired with a companion app for caregiver monitoring. Rather than launching nationwide immediately, the rollout followed a phased, evidence-based approach: the company first tested the doll with a group of over 9,000 users to gather empirical data on outcomes like depression levels and medication adherence. Local governments then began adopting the technology through pilot programs. Cheongsong County ran a trial phase targeting its large older population before committing to scale up services. Based on positive trial results, local governments in the Republic of Korea moved to expand deployment, with plans to distribute approximately 7,000 units to seniors and dementia patients. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It's a good practice because it pairs emotional/social support with practical health monitoring in a single, evidence-tested tool, trials with over 9,000 users showed measurable improvements in depression levels and medication adherence, giving it a credible evidence base. It's also replicable and scalable, as shown by local governments moving from a pilot phase to a broader rollout of roughly 7,000 units, offering a model other regions facing similar demographic pressures could adapt. Its sustainability is supported by government backing and integration into existing care systems through caregiver apps and monitoring platforms, embedding it as an ongoing part of elder care rather than a one-off intervention.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Hyodol AI
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect); Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The research report is based on primary data collection and presents the findings of a 2019/2020 scoping study that identifies policy, programme and service priorities for the Ministry, providing guidance to a future outlook for an effective health system response to an ageing population in Fiji. It enables the impetus to strengthen policies, systems and services to optimise the health and quality of life of older Fijians, their families, and the communities in which they live.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The main beneficiaries are policymakers and other stakeholders who benefit from primary data on the health of older persons as well as from an assessment of existing policies and how they support the changing health needs of older persons.

What were the results?

The report’s evidence-based assessment marked the first targeted evaluation of health system readiness for ageing populations in the Pacific, helping the Ministry of Health and NCOP pinpoint critical policy, program, and service gaps.

How was it developed and implemented?

The report was prepared by The George Institute for Global Health in partnership with Fiji’s Ministry of Health and Medical Services and supported by WHO. It combined quantitative analysis (demographic trends, health system data) and qualitative research (interviews and consultations with stakeholders, including health professionals, policymakers, and community representatives). It involved multi-sector consultations with government agencies, the National Council of Older Persons (NCOP), NGOs, and development partners.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It collects primary data on the status of health of older persons, therefore informing evidence-based policymaking.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Fiji Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Fiji National University, The Pacific Community, The George Institute for Global Health and the University of New South Wales
Categories:
Data and research (Research paper/study)
Country:
Fiji
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act, implemented by national and local Philippino Governments and the Social Security Organization (SSO), was signed into law to promote equal opportunities in employment. This act ensures the state promotes employment on the basis on abilities, knowledge, skills and qualifications rather than age and prohibits arbitrary age limitations in employment. This act additionally ensures employees have equal righs to compensation, benefits, promotion, training and other opportunities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Workers across all age groups—especially older workers—who may otherwise face age-based discrimination in hiring, promotion, or termination. It ensures fairness in employment processes for older individuals.

What were the results?

According to legal summaries, the Act prohibits discrimination in employment on account of age, ensuring that age—without being job‑related or consistent with business necessity—cannot be used against applicants or employees. This helps safeguard older and younger workers alike from discriminatory practices, promoting equal opportunities in hiring and retention.

How was it developed and implemented?

The law was developed as part of broader anti‑discrimination legislation in the Philippines, responding to gaps in existing labor protections. It was enacted by Congress in 2016 and integrated into the national legal framework, with employers required to align hiring and employment policies to the new standards.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It fosters inclusive workplaces by legally prohibiting unfair age-based discrimination in employment, thereby upholding both equity and labor rights across age groups.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments and the Social Security Organization (SSO)
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2016
What was implemented?

Navisaegim—meaning "engraving in one's mind" a respect for older people, is a mobile application developed by the Central Elderly Protective Service Agency to make reporting elder abuse faster, safer, and more accessible. It was launched during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period when visitation restrictions and limited access to homes, hospitals, and care facilities caused many abuse cases to go undetected, since fewer outside visitors were present to notice warning signs.
The app was designed with several features to lower barriers to reporting. It requires no membership or account creation, meaning anyone can use it immediately without registration. It also guarantees anonymity, asking users for only the minimum information necessary to file a report, which helps protect people who might otherwise be reluctant to come forward for fear of retaliation or involvement. Functionally, Navisaegim allows users to attach visual and audio evidence directly to their reports, including photographs, videos, and audio recordings, making it easier to document suspected mistreatment on the spot rather than relying on memory or delayed reporting. The app is available on major app stores. It works alongside a traditional reporting hotline, 1577-1389, offering people a number of ways to report suspected abuse at any time.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons, particularly those at risk of neglect or abuse. 

What were the results?

The number of senior mistreatment reports rose 35.4 percent, from 4,622 cases in 2017 to 6,774 cases in 2021. A key challenge is uncovering more elder abuse cases that tend to go unnoticed due to their elusive nature. A 2020 survey found that roughly 650,000 people, or 7.3 percent of the entire older population, reported having experienced mistreatment at least once or more in their later lives. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The Navisaegim app was developed and launched during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically in response to visitation restrictions at care homes and hospitals that left abuse cases going unnoticed. It was built to require no membership and guarantee anonymity, lowering barriers to reporting.
Further legal reinforcement came through amendments to the Welfare of the Aged Act, effective this July, making it punishable by law for abusers to refuse or disrupt rehabilitation programs. The government also expanded mandatory reporter categories and strengthened recidivism prevention programmes.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This is a good practice because it combines accessible, low-barrier technology with legal accountability to address a problem that is often hidden. Navisaegim's anonymous, membership-free reporting method removes the fear and complexity that typically prevent people from coming forward, while its ability to attach photos, videos, and audio makes reports more actionable. It is replicable in that it pairs a simple mobile app with an existing statutory framework and physical support network (37 local agencies and 19 shelters), rather than requiring entirely new infrastructure. It shows sustainability through legal reinforcement, amendments making rehabilitation refusal punishable by law, expanded mandatory reporting requirements, and embedding the practice into ongoing policy rather than a one-off campaign.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Central Elderly Protective Service Agency
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Information Report on Older Persons Experiencing Loss of Autonomy (2025) was prepared by an information mission of the Commission on Health and Solidarity of the Assembly of French Polynesia. Based on hearings, field visits and consultations conducted across several islands, the report assessed the situation of dependent older persons and proposed ten recommendations to strengthen support services, long-term care, caregiver assistance, housing adaptation and social protection. The report serves as a key reference document for the ongoing development of ageing policy in French Polynesia and provided the basis for the 2025 Assises de la Vieillesse (Aupuru Matahiapo). The forum was organized specifically to discuss the implementation of the report's ten recommendations and translate them into practical policy actions.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers benefit from data and information on the situation of older persons. 

What were the results?

The research report led to discussion how the recommendations can be implemented and may trigger the development of a policy on ageing. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The report was developed through a combination of desk study as well as extensive field work of 3.5 months across multiple islands. The researchers visited residential facilities of older persons as well as older persons living in their homes with their families as well as individuals. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Assises de la Vieillesse (Aupuru Matahiapo) represents a participatory and evidence-based approach to ageing policy development. Building on findings from a parliamentary inquiry, it convened government agencies, health and social service providers, local authorities, civil society organizations and community stakeholders to jointly identify priorities and practical solutions for ageing and loss of autonomy.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Commission de la santé et des solidarités of the Assembly of French Polynesia
Categories:
Data and research (Survey, Research paper/study)
Country:
French Polynesia
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

A study which aimed to assess the socio-economic conditions and needs of persons aged 55 and older, with a particular focus on the impacts of COVID-19. The study covered all 14 regions of Kazakhstan and explored areas such as health conditions, social and economic well-being, access to medical and social services, and the needs of older persons during emergencies. The study also examined preferences regarding social services, labour activity, housing, and participation in civic life. The findings of the survey were used in improving service delivery for older persons and additionally contributed to the Active Ageing Index.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers and policy advocates and practitioners who benefit from reliable data and information on the situation of older persons.

What were the results?

Findings contributed to the development of Kazakhstans active ageing index and policy recommendations for improving support systems for older adults. It also updated a 2008 survey, enabling comparative trend analysis over time.

How was it developed and implemented?

The study used a mixed-methods approach, practicing quantitative (in-depth interviews with experts from ministries, NGOs, and relevant agencies) and qualitative (individual standardized survey) research methods, covering all regions of the country.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice represents a strong evidence base for policy-making on ageing in Kazakhstan, highlighting its relevance as a good practice. It also had a directly measurable and long-term link to the ageing indices and 2008 baseline studies. This historic timeline ensures the longevity of the studies through future comparative frameworks. Finally, its use of a robust mixed-methods design increases its reliability as a survey and its strength as an evidence base for policy-making on ageing. 

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/3010

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
UNFPA, commissioned by Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of Kazakhstan
Categories:
Data and research (Survey, Research paper/study)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The National Plan, developed by the Australian Government and Attorney-General’s Department, aims to coordinate efforts to address elder abuse across five priority areas. These include: enhancing understanding, improving community awareness and access to information, strengthening service responses, planning for future decision-making and strengthening safeguards for vulnerable adults.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All older Australians, particularly those at risk of abuse in community settings. Beneficiaries also included governments, institutions, and service providers collaborating to protect seniors’ rights.

What were the results?

The plan united federal, state, and territory governments to respond to elder abuse, supported a national prevalence study, funded innovative service models, and promoted awareness campaigns. For instance, more than two-thirds of respondents reported seeing elder abuse awareness messages through advocacy groups, media, or social platforms.

How was it developed and implemented?

It was jointly developed by all governments, guided by the Australian Law Reform Commission’s 2017 recommendations, and implemented through cross-government collaboration, research, awareness campaigns, and service funding. Evaluation was conducted by the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It exemplifies effective cross-government collaboration, evidence-based policymaking, and community engagement, ensuring a national, coordinated response to elder abuse.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Australia, Attorney-General’s Department
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect); Implementation and follow-up
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2019-2023
What was implemented?

The Age Discrimination Act, implemented by the Australian Government, prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of age. This Act makes it unlawful to discriminate on the basis of age when advertising jobs, during recruitment and selection procsses, when making decisions about training, transfer and promotion opportunities and in the terms, conditions and termination of employment.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All Australians affected by age discrimination, especially older workers and people with disability, who faced barriers in employment, training, and promotion.

What were the results?

The program supported thousands of older and disabled workers by promoting inclusive recruitment, training managers, and developing workplace resources, reducing age-related job loss and fostering diversity.

How was it developed and implemented?

Through a national inquiry (2015–2016) with 1,100 consultations and 342 submissions, involving employers, community groups, and government. Outcomes included training modules, resource kits, and cross-sector partnerships for nationwide adoption.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is evidence-based, consultative, and replicable—combining legal reform, training, and partnerships to deliver measurable inclusion and fairness in employment.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Human Rights Commission Australia
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
The good practice stems from the Age Discrimination Act 2004, later expanded through national initiatives such as the Willing to Work Inquiry in 2016
What was implemented?

CLOVA CareCall is an AI-powered phone service that checks on users' well-being. The calls include everyday questions about various topics, as well as purposeful check-in conversations that reflect the current catastrophic or environmental situation. Designed to facilitate natural, friendly conversations rather than automated questions, it helps reduce loneliness and provide emotional support, as well as supporting local authorities in implementing care programmes.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Those who need care, particularly older persons people living alone

What were the results?

As of 2024, it had more than 30,000 users nationwide. Furthermore, cases of the early detection of health issues through this AI-based service have also been reported.

How was it developed and implemented?

The AI call service was initially launched by NAVER, a  web provider in the Republic of Korea, during the pandemic to check for symptoms. In late 2021, a pilot project was conducted to test a CareCall service targeting older persons living alone. Since 2022, the service has officially been launched and implemented in various regions.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The call service, which is based on AI, enables customized conversations for the purpose of checking the well-being of elderly people, as well as the implementation of care support. It showcases the use of innovative technology in care sectors.

Supporting documents:

CLOVA CareCall 개요

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Naver Cloud Platform
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2022

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.