Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 319 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The Brain Bank, created in 2000 by the Thai Government, is a depository of knowledge provided by retired older persons who volunteer to share expertise in fields such as agriculture, finance, politics, law, education, medicine and more. This initiative preserves knowedge for future generations and fosters intergenerational exchange by creating networks for sharing relevant information across the country.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries were Thai citizens aged 60 and above, especially those without income, caregivers, persons with disabilities, and vulnerable elderly populations in both urban and rural areas.

What were the results?

The programme supports over 10 million older persons, strengthening community inclusion, enhancing well-being through universal healthcare, income security (via pensions and savings funds), and expanding caregiving capacity via 80,000 trained volunteers nationwide.

How was it developed and implemented?

Thailand’s implementation drew from the 2002 MIPAA framework and was led by the Department of Older Persons under the Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. National strategies included legal reforms (Act on the Elderly 2003), monthly allowances, caregiver training, community elderly centers, and health service enhancements (e.g. elderly clinics, fast-track lanes, HHC). Monitoring occurred every five years, with university-led evaluations guiding adjustments.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It’s holistic, rights-based, and institutionally embedded, promoting healthy ageing, financial protection, and community empowerment through evidence-based, scalable interventions.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Thailand
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2002-2016
What was implemented?

The Foundation for Older Persons' Development (FOPDEV) is a national network of Thai grassroots NGOs working with and for disadvantaged older persons, particularly in Northern Thailand's indigenous communities. Its community-based home care service program encourages independent living for older people and lightens the burden on family caregivers by providing volunteer home-helpers to older people with physical or emotional limitations. The program also builds the capacity of the volunteers club so that they can deliver services directly to older people. The volunteers focus on basic health support, rights information, and social assistance to older people with limited mobility or family support - including in indigenous languages. Buddy HomeCare is a social enterprise created as an extension of FOPDEV's Home Care Service. The Buddy HomeCare model is anchored in a mobile health management platform that links community‑based care with digital monitoring. The system supports individualized care planning, routine health screening, and the documentation of health and daily‑living support activities. By enabling data entry from a range of stakeholders — including trained caregivers, volunteers, older persons, and families — the platform facilitates ongoing health surveillance and flags emerging risks through threshold‑based alerts. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Vulnerable older persons, including in remote and indigenous communities, as well as youth training as caregivers.

What were the results?

Buddy HomeCare's mobile app-based system for healthcare monitoring is a key tool in a program that provides impoverished youth with training as caregivers, while also providing older people with cost-effective, high-quality homecare services.

How was it developed and implemented?

Buddy HomeCare (BHC) is a social enterprise operated by FOPDEV, developed from earlier volunteer‑based homecare programmes and formally scaled from around 2015 onwards.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The dual approach of addressing ageing in place and youth unemployment benefits underprivileged communities. While there are other examples of healthcare monitoring systems, the Buddy HomeCare  has a unique social enterprise approach serving both paying customers and low-income older persons and families.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Foundation for Older Persons' Development (FOPDEV) and Buddy HomeCare Social Enterprise
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2015
What was implemented?

The Government of China released the 2021 National Aging Development Report, providing a comprehensive overview of the country’s aging landscape, including demographic data on the number of older persons and dependency ratios. The report also outlined current policies, fiscal investment strategies, and multisector coordination efforts aimed at strengthening China’s aging-care system. These actions support enhanced planning, funding, and oversight in response to rapid population aging.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Direct beneficiaries of the report are policymakers, researchers, and service providers who benefit from improved access to reliable data, which support evidence-based planning, monitoring, and service delivery related to population ageing. The ultimate goal is that older persons benefit from more effective policies that affect older persons.

What were the results?

The data provided in the Statistical Bulletin served as a foundation for future aging-related research and international reporting commitments.

How was it developed and implemented?

The bulletin was jointly developed and published by the National Health Commission, the National Working Commission on Aging, and the National Bureau of Statistics. Data was collected through national surveys and administrative records across sectors such as healthcare, civil affairs, and social security. The process involved coordination among ministries, data harmonization, and standardized reporting formats to ensure accuracy and comparability. The final report was released on the official government portal for public and institutional access.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice demonstrates inter-agency coordination, data transparency, and evidence-based policy support. By systematically publishing key statistics on older persons, it ensures informed decision-making and monitoring of aging-related programs. The consistent, public release of such bulletins also fosters accountability and enables researchers, policymakers, and the public to track progress in elderly care and social protection.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Health Commission, National Working Committee on Aging, National Bureau of Statistics of China
Categories:
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

Ulfaaveri Raastaa is a wellness initiative that aims to help isolated seniors reintegrate into active community life. More specifically they targeted both seniors living in homes for people with special needs and seniors isolated in rural areas.  These sessions covered topics of healthy diets, exercise routines, and mental health. The sessions were interactive, aiming to combat high loneliness levels in the Maldives. The programme pairs seniors with young volunteers, aiming to ensure traditional knowledge is passed down generations. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Senior citizens who are institutionalized in homes or who are isolated

What were the results?

Over 1000 senior citizens have graduated from the wellness sessions, and they showed high engagement rates. The program has also expanded across 11 different atolls.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed due to high levels of loneliness of older persons in the Maldives. Many older persons were in state care due to lack of social skills or lack of family support rather than an illness or disability. This program was developed to help them gain the necessary skills to re-enter society.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme addresses key issues that many older persons in Maldives face: isolation and institutional dependency. The programme focuses on social reintegration rather than solely medical needs. Additionally, it highlights the importance of intergenerational initiatives, to ensure precious knowledge is passed down to the younger populations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Social and Family Development
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Maldives
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The Care Centers Act, implemented by the Malaysian Government and Ministry of Social Welfare, aimed to regulate the establishment of care centres, and the registration, control and inspection of care centres and for matters connected.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The Act benefits users of care centres across demographics—including children, persons with disabilities, juveniles, and senior citizens—by ensuring that care facilities (both residential and day care) operate under proper standards, control, and inspection.

What were the results?

The Act established mandatory registration, inspections, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure operational standards and protect vulnerable groups. As a result, registered care centres operate under clearer regulatory oversight, reducing the risk of unregulated or substandard facilities. For instance:

How was it developed and implemented?

Drafted by Malaysia’s Ministry of Social Welfare, the Act was passed by Parliament in 1993 and published in the Gazette the same year. Implementation began via phased enforcement: registration requirements, issuance of certificates, inspections, and penalties for unregistered operations—empowered through authorized social welfare officers and the Director General.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It establishes a clear, enforceable regulatory framework mandating registration and oversight of care centres, thereby safeguarding vulnerable populations through structured enforcement and accountability.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Malaysia Ministry of Social Welfare
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1993
What was implemented?

The Care Provider Allowance is a provision under Regulation 8A(1) of the Old Age and Disability Pensions Regulations. It expands the categories of disabilities eligible for support and provides a monthly allowance to individuals who assume caregiving responsibilities for older persons or persons with disabilities.

The allowance offers financial assistance of $250 per month to support caregiving responsibilities. It also strengthens accountability by requiring care providers to formally accept responsibility, with legal action possible if neglect occurs.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Care providers who provide necessary daily care for persons with disabilities and/or older persons

How was it developed and implemented?

The allowance was incorporated through regulatory amendment and requires medical certification of disability based on guidelines issued by the Director-General of Medical Services. Care providers must sign a declaration acknowledging their caregiving duties, ensuring oversight and compliance.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice provides targeted financial support to caregivers while ensuring protection for vulnerable older persons and persons with disabilities. The combination of medical certification, official guidelines, and legal accountability ensures structured and responsible caregiving.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Brunei Darussalam
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
Brunei Darussalam
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Care Allowance scheme, implemented by the Department of Labor and Welfare in Mongolia, is a financial scheme taregeted at family members that care for older persons in need of permanent care and to those taking care of older family members. This scheme provides an allowance of MNT 84,500 per month,which was determined by the government as it aligns with the minimum living standard.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Beneficiaries include retired or near‑retirement professionals (senior specialists and veterans) aged typically 60+, who gain meaningful engagement and supplemental income, while younger generations benefit from mentorship and advisory support.

What were the results?

By 2021, the programme engaged 884 senior professionals in advisory roles and supported 442 with repayable financial assistance, leading to over 1,390 new job placements. It enhanced older persons’ income security, promoted self-employment, and strengthened institutional capacity through intergenerational knowledge transfer.

How was it developed and implemented?

The program was structured under the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, using national and local budgets. It integrates senior professionals into advisory and income-generating roles via structured grants and support mechanisms, including repayable funding and employment generation schemes.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It transforms ageing into an asset—leveraging accumulated expertise of seniors to foster advisory capacity, create jobs, and honor lifelong contributions, while aligning with both social protection and active ageing goals.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Labor and Welfare
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Mongolia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Caregivers Allowance in the Cook Islands is a government welfare payment that provides financial support to adults aged 18 and over—regardless of nationality—who reside in the Cook Islands and care for an older person, a person with a disability, or a child with high care needs. Caregivers must not be in full-time employment, and eligible recipients receive $100 NZD twice monthly.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Caregivers

What were the results?

A multi‑programme evaluation (UNICEF, 2020) found that the caregiver allowance—alongside other social cash transfers—plays a critical role in reducing poverty, vulnerability, and risk, especially in households caring for elderly, disabled, or dependent persons. It contributes significantly to household welfare in both Rarotonga and the Pa Enua

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of the Caregivers Allowance in the Cook Islands is rooted in the country’s long-standing, tax‑financed social protection system, which began expanding significantly from the 1960s onward, and formally included a caregiver payment by the time the Welfare Act 1989 was established. This Act created the structural basis for multiple welfare payments—including those for older persons, persons with disabilities, and caregivers—and embedded the principle that the state should support families caring for vulnerable members. Over the decades, the allowance evolved through continuous policy refinement driven by government reviews, parliamentary oversight, and social‑sector evaluations. By 2017, the Caregivers Policy and its administration were scrutinized in a Public Accounts Committee inquiry, which examined implementation quality, eligibility rules, and payment mechanisms—showing active policy shaping and administrative strengthening.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It values caregivers and provides social protection. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Internal Affairs
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Cook Islands
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
1989
What was implemented?

The Carer Payment Initiative, implemented by national and local Australian Governments, provides payment to individuals who care for disabled, unwell or elderly individuals. This payment is provided to carers who have provided constant care for a minimum of six months, minimising the impact that caring for a family member has on earning income.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries are carers (often family members) providing constant care to people with disability, severe illness, or frailty who cannot support themselves independently.

What were the results?

The program supported a rapidly growing carer population. Recipients rose from about 57,800 in 2001 to 301,200 in June 2022, increasing from 0.4% to 1.4% of the population aged 16+. In 2025, reforms allowed carers to work up to 100 hours every 4 weeks, offering greater flexibility and improving labour market participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

Established under the Social Security Act, administered by Services Australia. A 2008 review expanded eligibility to parents of children with severe disability, adding ~19,000 new recipients. Implementation has relied on legislative adjustments and regular updates to reflect carers’ evolving needs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides long-term, responsive support to carers while adapting rules to promote inclusion, sustainability, and work-life balance.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1985
What was implemented?

In Japan, the “Club of Friendship between Generations in Akita”, implemented by the local community, brings together an intergenerational group of individuals in their 20s to those in their 80s to encourage friendships and enhance social networks across generations. The club provides community spaces for residents to meet, form friendships and participate in social activities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older residents of Akita City, Japan—particularly senior citizens facing barriers to mobility, social engagement, and access to services due to demographic ageing and youth out‑migration.

What were the results?

Recognised as an “Age-Friendly City” in 2019 and honouring “Aging-Friendly Partners” by 2025, the city strengthened public–private collaboration and fostered a more inclusive environment for seniors.

How was it developed and implemented?

Akita City, a WHO Global Network member since 2011, has advanced age-friendly initiatives such as a one-coin bus service (launched 2011, expanded 2017) to improve elderly mobility, the intergenerational “Club of Friendship Between Generations” to strengthen social ties, and a multi-generational city hall built in 2016 with universal design features like concierge support, wheelchair paths, and heated floors/roads for winter safety. It also formalized an Age-Friendly Partner program engaging local businesses and institutions in senior support.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Akita City has advanced age-friendliness through integrated efforts in transport, infrastructure, governance, and community programs, combining accessible design with social engagement. Since joining the WHO network in 2011, it has sustained and expanded services, built public–private partnerships, and introduced tailored solutions—such as heated mobility paths and low-cost transport—to meet local ageing and winter-related challenges.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local community
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2011

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.