Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 319 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

Adult Day Care Centers, implemented by the National and Local Türkiye Governments, aims to improve living environments for older persons who have dementia or Alzheimers Disease. These centers offer leisure activities, provide assistance, guidance and professional counseling and supporst them through their daily activities, whilst enriching their social and psychological well-being.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Türkiye (primarily 65+, some services 60+), including low-income seniors, those needing home or long-term care, and their families/caregivers.

What were the results?

The programme supports older persons nationwide—e.g., YADES operates in 13 metropolitan cities—expanding home/day care, simplifying access to health, social assistance and transport concessions, and improving rights awareness through a single, user-friendly guide and 24/7 hotlines.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services compiled a national, rights-based guide that consolidates scattered rules and entitlements for seniors. Implementation is multi-sectoral: Social Assistance and Solidarity Foundations assess eligibility and deliver cash/in-kind aid; the Ministry of Health and Home Health Units provide home health, palliative and vaccination services; Provincial Directorates and municipal partners deliver home care and day services; long-term care is provided via public/private nursing homes and “Elderly Living Homes.” Access pathways are standardized—e-government, PTT payments, foundation applications, and national call centers (Alo 183; 444 38 33). The YADES programme channels Ministry funds to municipalities to scale home/day care and ageing-in-place supports.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It turns a complex service ecosystem into one clear, accessible entry point, grounded in human-rights principles and inter-agency coordination, with practical access channels (hotlines, e-gov, local foundations) that reduce barriers for older persons.

Supporting documents:

Ministry of Family and Social Services, “Ministry has prepared ‘Services Application Guide’” (online article discussing the Information Guide for Older Persons, 2020), available on the official aile.tr website. *Active Living Center

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Age-friendly enterprises programme, implemented by the Government of the Republic of Korean and Ministry of Health and Welfare, is a project focused on creating stable and sustainable jobs for the elderly. This programme recognises companies that hire older persons, by designating companies that employ a large number of elderly people as senior-friendly.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons aged 60+ who gain access to paid jobs; and employers (companies, cooperatives, individual entrepreneurs) that hire many 60+ workers and receive grants/consulting after designation.

What were the results?

The Senior-Friendly Companies initiative continues to grow, reaching 338 designated firms by 2022 and adding 27 more in the first half of 2024, supported by KRW 1.75 billion in grants.

How was it developed and implemented?

Led by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) and implemented by KORDI. Employers apply via open calls; MOHW screens and designates firms. Designated firms commit to hiring targets for workers 60+ and receive financial support (up to KRW 300 million), management consulting, preferential purchasing, and bid score benefits. The 2022 EIEC notice set a rolling call (Jan 10–Jun 30) inviting companies, cooperatives, and sole proprietors.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Senior-Friendly Companies initiative represents a targeted approach to private-sector job creation for seniors, with clear eligibility criteria and measurable outputs such as the number of designated firms and grant volumes. Since its launch in 2011, it has maintained a sustained, scalable design, with hundreds of firms designated and continued expansion. The programme offers an integrated support package—including grants, consulting, and procurement or bid incentives—that enables firms to sustain senior employment beyond short-term subsidies.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of the Republic of Korea, Ministry of Health and Welfare
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

Hawker Centers in Singapore have become intangible cultural heritage, creating diverse community spaces. Efforts have been made to make hawker centers accessible and age-friendly, including with places to place a stick or other assistive devices, make them accessible for people with visual impairments etc. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

People of all ages in Singapore.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Hawker centers provide access to food at low-cost, demonstrate the diversity of Singapore and through regulation food safety is ensured. Hawker centers also provide a low-cost community space where people of all ages can gather and are often used as a community-space by older persons. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Environment Agency (NEA) as regulator
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The National Housing Authority’s elderly housing initiative provides a set of free, ready-to-use house designs tailored to Thailand’s ageing population. It offers multiple small, affordable, single-storey housing models that incorporate universal design principles, ensuring safety, accessibility and ease of movement for older persons. Features include barrier-free layouts, good lighting, ventilation and user-friendly bathrooms. The designs are intended for ageing in place, enabling older people to live independently in familiar environments. Developed through a national design competition, the initiative promotes inclusive, modern housing that is suitable for all ages while remaining practical and cost-effective for widespread adoption.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The initiative benefits families with older persons in the household wishing to build a house; they can benefit from ready-made designs. Ultimate beneficiaries would be older persons who can benefit from age-friendly housing. 

What were the results?

There has been large interest demonstrated by the number of downloads of the designs (around 50,000), but little concrete data on the use of the designs in construction. 

How was it developed and implemented?

NHA launched a national design competition inviting architecture students and professionals to submit ideas for elderly-friendly housing. A panel of experts evaluated the submissions and selected the most suitable designs based on affordability, accessibility, safety and universal design principles

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The design competition through which the designs were generated raised awareness among young designers and architects on the requirements of age-friendly housing. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Housing Authority of Thailand
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

A free resource and guide that aims to empower LGBTQI+ elders in New Zealand to know their legal rights and use social connections.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older Takatāpui and LGBTQI+ individuals aged 55+ in New Zealand

What were the results?

Many individuals gained legal empowerment as the toolkit aided them to legally designate non-biological individuals as next of kin. It also established a directory of 'Rainbow-safe' social groups and community hubs, therefore preventing social withdrawals that often lead to neglect.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed through a lived-experience model. Researchers interviewed many Takatāpui and rainbow elders to figure out what resources they needed to feel safer.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Fills a gap, specifically addressing the legal  vulnerability of Rainbow elders, as many have become estranged from their biological families. This resource was developed ensuring it serves both Māori Takatāpui and non-Māori elders in New Zealand. Based off three years of research, driving the need for this resource. Gives the elderly autonomy to make their own legal decision, therefore preventing financial and psychological abuse.

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Hohou Te Rongo Kahukura, a specialist Rainbow violence prevention charitable trust). Funded by the Office for Seniors via the Elder Abuse Prevention fund
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

AgeNet international in Tajikistan, implemented by Civil society, focuses on three streams (A) Humanitarian Assistance Programmes, (B) Development Programmes through Resocialisation, and (C) Promotion of Gerontology Services Development. These efforts are set to collectively enhance the well-being, social inclusion and support systems for older persons in line with active ageing and inclusive development goals.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Socially vulnerable older persons in Tajikistan, including those living alone, with disabilities, or affected by crises.

What were the results?

The programme supports 2,000 vulnerable seniors, strengthening community inclusion, enhancing well-being, and advancing gerontology services through training and curriculum integration at TSMU.

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed through civil society initiative, where 21–35 organizations from Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan collaborated to form AgeNet International. Implementation involved: Establishment of the Central Asia Gerontology Centre in Tajikistan as a key regional node for gerontology services, methodological development, and coordination HelpAge International.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This initiative, led by civil society across Central Asia, fosters regional collaboration and peer learning, driven by NGOs and gerontological actors rather than solely government mandates. It integrates humanitarian aid, resocialisation programmes, and gerontology development to address older persons’ well-being.

View More
Who implemented it?
Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Civil society
Categories:
Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations)
Country:
Tajikistan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2005
What was implemented?

The research report is based on primary data collection and presents the findings of a 2019/2020 scoping study that identifies policy, programme and service priorities for the Ministry, providing guidance to a future outlook for an effective health system response to an ageing population in Fiji. It enables the impetus to strengthen policies, systems and services to optimise the health and quality of life of older Fijians, their families, and the communities in which they live.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The main beneficiaries are policymakers and other stakeholders who benefit from primary data on the health of older persons as well as from an assessment of existing policies and how they support the changing health needs of older persons.

What were the results?

The report’s evidence-based assessment marked the first targeted evaluation of health system readiness for ageing populations in the Pacific, helping the Ministry of Health and NCOP pinpoint critical policy, program, and service gaps.

How was it developed and implemented?

The report was prepared by The George Institute for Global Health in partnership with Fiji’s Ministry of Health and Medical Services and supported by WHO. It combined quantitative analysis (demographic trends, health system data) and qualitative research (interviews and consultations with stakeholders, including health professionals, policymakers, and community representatives). It involved multi-sector consultations with government agencies, the National Council of Older Persons (NCOP), NGOs, and development partners.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It collects primary data on the status of health of older persons, therefore informing evidence-based policymaking.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Fiji Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Fiji National University, The Pacific Community, The George Institute for Global Health and the University of New South Wales
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Fiji
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act, implemented by national and local Philippino Governments and the Social Security Organization (SSO), was signed into law to promote equal opportunities in employment. This act ensures the state promotes employment on the basis on abilities, knowledge, skills and qualifications rather than age and prohibits arbitrary age limitations in employment. This act additionally ensures employees have equal righs to compensation, benefits, promotion, training and other opportunities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Workers across all age groups—especially older workers—who may otherwise face age-based discrimination in hiring, promotion, or termination. It ensures fairness in employment processes for older individuals.

What were the results?

According to legal summaries, the Act prohibits discrimination in employment on account of age, ensuring that age—without being job‑related or consistent with business necessity—cannot be used against applicants or employees. This helps safeguard older and younger workers alike from discriminatory practices, promoting equal opportunities in hiring and retention.

How was it developed and implemented?

The law was developed as part of broader anti‑discrimination legislation in the Philippines, responding to gaps in existing labor protections. It was enacted by Congress in 2016 and integrated into the national legal framework, with employers required to align hiring and employment policies to the new standards.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It fosters inclusive workplaces by legally prohibiting unfair age-based discrimination in employment, thereby upholding both equity and labor rights across age groups.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments and the Social Security Organization (SSO)
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2016
What was implemented?

A study which aimed to assess the socio-economic conditions and needs of persons aged 55 and older, with a particular focus on the impacts of COVID-19. The study covered all 14 regions of Kazakhstan and explored areas such as health conditions, social and economic well-being, access to medical and social services, and the needs of older persons during emergencies. The study also examined preferences regarding social services, labour activity, housing, and participation in civic life. The findings of the survey were used in improving service delivery for older persons and additionally contributed to the Active Ageing Index.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers and policy advocates and practitioners who benefit from reliable data and information on the situation of older persons.

What were the results?

Findings contributed to the development of Kazakhstans active ageing index and policy recommendations for improving support systems for older adults. It also updated a 2008 survey, enabling comparative trend analysis over time.

How was it developed and implemented?

The study used a mixed-methods approach, practicing quantitative (in-depth interviews with experts from ministries, NGOs, and relevant agencies) and qualitative (individual standardized survey) research methods, covering all regions of the country.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice represents a strong evidence base for policy-making on ageing in Kazakhstan, highlighting its relevance as a good practice. It also had a directly measurable and long-term link to the ageing indices and 2008 baseline studies. This historic timeline ensures the longevity of the studies through future comparative frameworks. Finally, its use of a robust mixed-methods design increases its reliability as a survey and its strength as an evidence base for policy-making on ageing. 

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/3010

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
UNFPA, commissioned by Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of Kazakhstan
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The National Plan, developed by the Australian Government and Attorney-General’s Department, aims to coordinate efforts to address elder abuse across five priority areas. These include: enhancing understanding, improving community awareness and access to information, strengthening service responses, planning for future decision-making and strengthening safeguards for vulnerable adults.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All older Australians, particularly those at risk of abuse in community settings. Beneficiaries also included governments, institutions, and service providers collaborating to protect seniors’ rights.

What were the results?

The plan united federal, state, and territory governments to respond to elder abuse, supported a national prevalence study, funded innovative service models, and promoted awareness campaigns. For instance, more than two-thirds of respondents reported seeing elder abuse awareness messages through advocacy groups, media, or social platforms.

How was it developed and implemented?

It was jointly developed by all governments, guided by the Australian Law Reform Commission’s 2017 recommendations, and implemented through cross-government collaboration, research, awareness campaigns, and service funding. Evaluation was conducted by the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It exemplifies effective cross-government collaboration, evidence-based policymaking, and community engagement, ensuring a national, coordinated response to elder abuse.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Australia, Attorney-General’s Department
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect); Implementation and follow-up
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2019-2023

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.