Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The Act on Prohibition of Discriminantion in Employment, implemented by the Republic of Korea Government, prohibits discrimination on the basis of age without reasonable grounds and supports and promotes the elderly to find jobs suited to their abilities, consequently ensuring employment stablility for the elderly.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older workers in South Korea, particularly those who might otherwise face age-based discrimination in employment.

What were the results?

South Korea has achieved record-high older worker employment, with 40.8% of those aged 65+ employed in Q2 2025, the highest on record, and leading the OECD with a 37.3% participation rate in 2023.

How was it developed and implemented?

The 1991 enactment of the Elderly Employment Promotion Act laid the initial legal foundation for promoting employment among older persons in South Korea. In 2008, the law was comprehensively revised and renamed the Act on Prohibition of Age Discrimination in Employment and Elderly Employment Promotion, formally prohibiting age discrimination and institutionalizing age categories (e.g., “aged” as 55+ and “middle-aged” as 50–54). Subsequent amendments and enforcement decrees refined its scope, with the 2022 partial amendment further modernizing the law to address demographic shifts and evolving labor market conditions.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Act provides a strong legal foundation by explicitly prohibiting age discrimination in hiring, pay, promotion, and termination, with criminal penalties for employers who retaliate against complainants. It has proven adaptable through major reforms, such as the 2008 overhaul and 2022 updates, and continues to evolve through active societal debate. Aligned with demographic realities, it encourages older individuals to remain in the workforce and supports inclusion through re-employment programs, training subsidies, and flexible work arrangements. While execution challenges remain, its enforcement mechanisms, court rulings, and ongoing policy dialogue offer a solid basis for improving labour market equity for an ageing population.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
Partially reformed and re-promulgated on 2022, under Law No. 18921.
What was implemented?

Japan amended the Act on Stabilization of Employment of Elderly Persons, effective April 1, 2021, to address rapid population aging and labor shortages. The amendment requires employers to make "best efforts" to secure employment opportunities for workers up to age 70. Employers can choose from several measures: raising or abolishing the retirement age; introducing a continuous employment system to age 70, or offering non‑employment options such as outsourcing arrangements or participation in employer‑funded social contribution activities. Non‑employment measures require consent from a majority labor union or employee representative. Employers may set eligibility standards, but they must be non‑discriminatory and negotiated with employees. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons between 65 and 70 years of age who choose to continue to be in employed labour

What were the results?

As a result of the act, more companied implemented measures to enable older persons to work. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The act builds on earlier amendments of the law. It builds on guidelines from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and was shaped by consultations with trade unions. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

In line with the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA) it addresses aged-based discrimination and creates employment for older persons. It also enhances the pool of labour for the private sector. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Act by Government, private sector to implement
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Senior Citizens Act, 2014 establishes a legal framework to ensure the welfare, dignity, and protection of residents aged 60 and above. It creates the Senior Citizens Welfare Council, a statutory body composed of government officials and NGO representatives, responsible for formulating ageing policies, coordinating welfare activities, promoting geriatric healthcare, conducting research, raising awareness, and establishing senior citizen homes. The Act allows senior citizens to obtain a Senior Citizen Card, granting benefits such as free entry to public facilities, financial assistance, hospital concessions, separate medical wards, and access to senior citizens’ organizations. A Welfare Fund is established to support these initiatives, sourced from government allocations, donations, and secure investments, with mandatory annual audits made public. The Act empowers the government to make rules, the Council to issue regulations, and repeals the earlier 2014 Ordinance.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older citizens of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa district, Pakistan

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It establishes a legal base for a Social Welfare Fund and issuance of senior citizens cards. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Pakistan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2014
What was implemented?

An action plan aimed at enhancing the well-being and quality of life of older citizens. The primary objectives include improving the financial status of older adults, increasing their employment opportunities, providing family support, enhancing health-care services, and promoting social integration through leisure activities and modernizing public consciousness around ageing. The plan also focuses on strengthening the social services sector and providing emergency support for older individuals.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Practitioners in different line Ministry benefit from a clear action plan. Older citizens of Kazakhstan are the ultimate beneficiaries

What were the results?

This action plan established the need for Active Longevity Centrees. As of January 1, 2023, there were a total of 63 centers operating throughout the country.

How was it developed and implemented?

The action plan was planned by the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of Kazakhstan with technical assistance from the UNFPA. It involves coordinated effort across multiple sectors, such as healthcare, social services, employment, family support, and engages ministries and local authorities. The Department of Social Assistance Policy Development is responsible for submitting an annual consolidated report on implementation progress to the Minister of  Labour and Social Protection.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This Action Plan focuses on improving the quality of life of older persons by addressing multiple key sectors, and not just one area. Therefore, it strives to improve quality of life across the board. It also emphasises community participation through its active ageing centres. Further, its annual reporting requirement ensures accountability, as well as ongoing evaluation of progress toward objectives, making the plan more sustainable and the goals more achievable.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
The plan was initiated by the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of Kazakhstan, with technical assistance provided by UNFPA in Kazakhstan.
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives, Participation of older persons, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The Action Plan for Successful Ageing (2023), launched by the Ministerial Committee on Ageing (MCA), was developed through engagement with over 5,000 Singaporeans and focuses on empowering older persons to take charge of their ageing journeys. The plan is anchored on three ‘C’s: (1) Care, promoting physical and mental well-being through programmes and care services such as the enhanced health and wellness programme, dementia support and end-of-life planning; (2) Contribution, enabling older persons to contribute through productive employment, volunteering and lifelong learning opportunities; and (3) Connectedness, supporting ageing well in the community through age-friendly parks and gardens, improving mobility, strengthening inter-generational bonds and digital skills development to help older persons remain connected to society and their loved ones.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All stakeholders involved in the implementation are direct beneficiaries. The ultimate beneficiaries are all Singaporean citizens and Permanent Residents across the life course, but primarily older persons. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The refreshed Action Plan was developed through an extensive co-creation process led by Singapore's Ministerial Committee on Ageing (MCA). Between 2019 and 2021, more than 5,000 Singaporeans participated in over 40 engagement sessions, including focus group discussions, surveys, social media consultations, and a Citizens' Panel on Contribution. Participants included older persons, community organizations, businesses, ethnic organizations, government agencies, and members of the public. The consultations identified key concerns and aspirations that shaped the three pillars of the plan: Care, Contribution and Connectedness (3Cs).

Implementation follows a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach coordinated by the Ministerial Committee on Ageing, which was established in 2007 to coordinate policies related to population ageing.

The Action Plan contains a built-in monitoring framework based on measurable targets and indicators.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Singapore's 2023 Action Plan for Successful Ageing is a good practice because it adopts a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to population ageing, developed through extensive consultations with all stakeholders and it also contains a monitoring framework. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministerial Committee on Ageing (MCA)
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan, Monitoring framework); Older persons and development (Comprehensive policy frameworks)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Action Plan on Ageing, implemented by the Thai Government, is a practical plan that covers four sub-action plans. These include: preparing the population for ageing, raiseing the quality of life of the elderly in every dimension, promoting management systems that support an ageing society, increasing research potential in developing technology and innovation to support an ageing society.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are Thai adults aged 25–59 preparing for old age, as well as current older persons, with a focus on improving quality of life, health, economic security, social inclusion, and innovation-driven care systems.

What were the results?

As the plan is newly launched, comprehensive outcome data is not yet available. However, supportive insights are emerging: the 2022 national “Situation of the Thai Older Persons” report highlights initiatives promoting employment and new career options for older Thais—enhancing income security and societal participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

Crafted through extensive stakeholder engagement—from central to local levels—the plan builds on four sub‑plans covering pre‑old age readiness, equitable quality-of-life improvements, systemic integration, and research & innovation. It includes defined indicators for monitoring (e.g., poverty reduction, healthy life expectancy, care access), establishes mechanisms for annual and five-year evaluations, and calls for budget integration across sectors and monitoring by the Department of Older Persons and the National Committee on Older Persons.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a long-term (15-year), evidence-informed, multi-sectoral framework with clear monitoring mechanisms and adaptive governance, fostering integration and innovation to holistically support both present and future older populations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2023-2037
What was implemented?

A government action plan operationalising the National Social Security Strategy by outlining timelines, responsible ministries, reform steps, and coordination mechanisms. It translates the NSSS framework into concrete administrative and programme reform actions, including social protection for older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Vulnerable populations across the life cycle, including older persons (60+), poor older persons, widows, persons with disabilities, and low-income households. 

What were the results?

The NSSS helped drive the expansion the "Old Age Allowance Programme" which provides cash payments to older persons and has increased coverage from 2.5 million to around 4.4 million older persons between 2015 and 2020. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as the national roadmap following NSSS approval. Implementation occurred through phased reforms, programme consolidation, budget alignment, and strengthening of beneficiary targeting systems.

Supporting documents:

National Social Security Strategy

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Government of Bangladesh through the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Social Welfare
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Bangladesh
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2016
What was implemented?

Active Aging Hubs are community‑based, integrated service centers that bring together health care, social care, home‑based support, rehabilitation services, and social participation opportunities for older adults. They were piloted beginning in 2021 in three settings: a nongovernmental residential home, a state‑run Elder Development Center, and a public hospital.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Mongolia requiring mild support

What were the results?

Pilot results showed that the hubs:

  • Reduced social isolation
  • Improved health outcomes for moderately and severely dependent older adults
  • Enhanced support for family caregivers
    These outcomes are documented in ADB’s follow‑up reports detailing feasibility and community impact.
How was it developed and implemented?

The Active Aging Hubs were incorporated into Mongolia’s National Operational Plan for Long‑Term Care (2022–2024), which formalized the need for developing a comprehensive long‑term care system and supported piloting AAHs for scalable national expansion. [adb.org]

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The AAH approach addresses Mongolia’s demographic challenges—rapid ageing, rural depopulation, and weakened family‑based support structures—by bringing services closer to where older adults live. It represents a high‑impact, innovative, and scalable model that other countries with dispersed populations can adapt.

Each hub is supported by a steering committee including local governors, health officials, NGOs, and elder associations. This ensures inter‑sectoral coordination, improves referral pathways, and creates community ownership—critical for a vast country with dispersed populations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Asian Development Bank in partnership with Government of Mongolia
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Mongolia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

This initiative introduced the calculation of the Active Ageing Index and the implementation of dedicated surveys to generate data on ageing. It aims to support evidence-based policymaking by measuring participation, health, and enabling environments for older persons. Implemented nationally, it strengthens data and knowledge generation on ageing trends.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The direct beneficiaries are policymakers and other stakeholders who benefit from data and analysis on population-ageing for evidence-based policymaking. 

What were the results?

It generated data to be used for evidence-based policymaking. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed under the 2019–2021 project “Building a Society for All Ages,” jointly implemented by the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Population and UNFPA.  The project prepared Azerbaijan’s first Active Ageing Index through surveys and national statistics for people aged 55 and over. It measured the extent to which older people live independently, work and participate in society, and was designed for use at both national and sub‑national levels. A report was also carried out by the UNFPA and Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of population of the Republic of Azerbaijan in order to analyse the index, finding that the principles reinforced by the AAI are crucial for healthy ageing on a societal level. Further, the AAI successfully surveyed 2,002 adults aged 55+ in October 2020 accross nine regions allowing for the official index to be calculated.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The index uses an internationally standardised methodology, producing evidence for policy and allowing comparison with other countries.  By identifying strengths and gaps, it supports data‑driven planning at national and regional levels and can be replicated elsewhere.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Labour and Social Protection of the Population and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
Categories:
Data and research
Country:
Azerbaijan
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

Published by TurkStat, the AAI measures how actively older persons (aged 55 and over) participate in society across four domains: employment, participation in society, independent/healthy/secure living, and capacity and enabling environment for active ageing. The index was designed to be directly comparable to AAI scores calculated for ECE member countries, allowing Türkiye to benchmark its performance against other countries in the ECE region. Data was calculated at the national level by sex for 2023, and expanded in 2024 to include a full breakdown by the country's 12 Statistical Regions (SR Level 1) and by sex within each region. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers are the direct beneficiaries. 

What were the results?

The AAI increased the evidence-based for policymaking. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The AAI methodology originated in 2012 under UNECE guidance, tied to the European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, and comprises 4 domains built from 22 underlying indicators (e.g., employment rates by age band, volunteering, caregiving, health access, income security, digital literacy, life expectancy metrics). TurkStat adapted the methodology to Turkish national data, first calculating national- and sex-disaggregated scores for 2023, then extending the methodology in 2024 to produce regional (SR Level 1) breakdowns by sex. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a good practice because it adapts well-tested methodology,  enabling Türkiye to analyse and better assess its own demographic trends and further allows to benchmark itself against other countries using identical domains and scoring logic.  It draws on standard demographic and labor-force data collectable through routine national statistical infrastructure (TurkStat), enabling standardised re-measurement over time. Finally, this practice also functions as a diagnostic tool that can assist governmental, public and private,  organizations in developing targeted policy interventions where needed. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
TURKSTAT- Turkish Statistical Institute
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2025

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.