Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 319 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

Japan Post is Japan's national postal service. The Elderly Watch Service allows elderly in throughout Japan to subscribe to receive one 60-minute home visit or have daily phone check ins (for a monthly fee of Y1000). 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Senior citizens of Japan

What were the results?

By Feb 2019, there were 10,592 users of the service, and seniors often used the service for many months in a row. A study by Inagaki and Awata (2020) showed that the service had a positive impact on mental health of elderly who live alone in social isolation.

How was it developed and implemented?

Japan Post is Japan's national postal service. The Minamori Watch over service allows older persons all over Japan to subscribe to receive one 60-minute home visit or have daily phone check ins (for a monthly fee of Y1000). 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Addresses the large number of seniors living alone in Japan, and allows seniors to take charge of their lives by subscribing to have social interaction and health check ins.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Japan Post, a corporation owned by the Government of Japan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2015
What was implemented?

Established under the National Action Plan for the Promotion of Open Government (2020–2022), this hotline provides an accessible mechanism for individuals to report rights violations and seek assistance. It supports protection against abuse, neglect, and discrimination, including age-related issues. Implemented nationally, it strengthens access to justice and accountability.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons and whole of society 

What were the results?

The call center receives thousands of calls every year, showing that it is a well-accepted mechanism to raise complaints. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The Immediate Response Hotline was developed by the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman) of the Republic of Azerbaijan as part of reforms to improve access to the Ombudsman and increase the efficiency of citizen complaints and inquiries. It was established by creating a unified call center reachable via the number “916”, consolidating previous hotlines into one modern telephone and IT-supported service. This development was carried out under the National Action Plan on Promotion of Open Government (2020–2022) to expand citizens’ ability to lodge appeals and ensure rapid handling of complaints. The unified hotline operates 24/7 across the country, including weekends and holidays, enabling people to call for immediate assistance from the Ombudsman’s Office.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The hotline is considered a good practice because it provides continuous, low-threshold access to human-rights protection services through a 24/7 unified call centre, removing barriers such as written applications or physical travel. It is replicable, as it relies on standard call-centre infrastructure that can be integrated into national human-rights institutions, and sustainable, as it is embedded within the Ombudsman’s permanent institutional framework and referenced in national and international policy reporting.

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Office of the Ombudsman
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect); Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Azerbaijan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

To calculate National Transfer Accounts (NTA), a new question was included in HIES 2019, to be able to differentiate between children attending private and public education institutions. This was based on a recommendation by a consultant for National Transfer Accounts.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Maldives Bureau of Statistics (MBS), Ministry of Education (MoE), World Bank (WB), Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE), ADB

What were the results?

The incusion of an additoinal question in HIES 2019 provided data that allowed the calculation of NTAs for Maldives

How was it developed and implemented?

Discussion with an NTA consultant and the National Bureau of Statistics on an additional question could be incorporated into a questionnaire that had already been developed.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It facilitated for better analysis in the country; Poverty & inequality analysis, NTA analysis. And provided information on the number of students in tertiary education for Ministry of Higher Education.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Maldives Bureau of Statistics
Categories:
Data and research
Country:
Maldives
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The Housewife Pension Scheme 2018, implemented by the National and Local Malaysian Governments and Social Security Organization (SSO), aimed to provide social security protection to housewives against domestic injury and invalidity while managing the household.

Who were the beneficiaries?

N/A

What were the results?

N/A

How was it developed and implemented?

N/A

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

N/A

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments, Social Security Organization (SSO)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

This is a social protection programme in Sri Lanka, designed to address the housing needs of the most vulnerable senior citizens. It is built on ageing in place  philosophy, and aims to ensure that low-income seniors do not become homeless or get forced into institutional care. The scheme identifies housing as a fundamental human right that can directly impact health, dignity and safety.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Poor older persons in Sri Lanka

What were the results?

Seniors reported an increase in dignity as many seniors were able to move into their first permanent home, saying it restored their status in the village. The programme also encouraged many adults to move back to their families and care for their parents, as the improved living conditions made multi-generational living more comfortable.

How was it developed and implemented?

This programme was developed as a poverty alleviation project to solve homelessness, and was later further defined into a elderly-friendly housing model. The goal transitioned from simply building shelter to creating age-friendly havens that support ageing in place.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This initiative has shown how a small change in the life of an older person can improve their quality of life greatly. The programme supports the "ageing in place" concept, allowing seniors to live out their days safely at home.

Supporting documents:

NSE

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Secretariat for Elders (NSE)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Sri Lanka
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

Singapore offers housing that is already fitted with senior friendly amendments for seniors who wish to move, Community Care Apartments (CCA). These apartments come with flexible lease lengths, and the buildings have amenities that support environmentally sustainable living, community building activities, and they are affordable for all inhabitants. Additionally, there is an onsite manager trained to coordinate 24-hour emergency response. The scheme also supports inter-generational living situations, allowing Singaporean seniors to age in place due to the accessible housing. For seniors who do not wish to move, the EASE (Enhancement for Active Seniors) scheme implements heavy subsidies to retrofit flats with senior friendly features. This programme also offers different scenarios for different needs, such as the opportunity for seniors who already own flats to selling part of their lease to the Housing Development Board and receive a stream of income while continuing to live in the flat.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Those aged 55 or over

What were the results?

80% of Singapore's elderly population lives in this senior friendly housing. This programme is highly successful, as it has been ongoing from 1998 until present day.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as a response to the finding that Singapore would become a 'super aged' society by the year 2026, which triggered the need to provide adequate housing. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme allows older persons to have autonomy in their living situation, they can have access to housing that suits their physical needs, and the short leases allow them to have freedom to choose where they want to live. Supports the ageing-in-place philosophy.

Supporting documents:

HDB | For Our Seniors

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Housing and Development Board (HDB) + Government of Singapore
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
1998 - ongoing
What was implemented?

The Japanese Organization for Employment of the Elderly, Persons with Disabilities and Job Seekers (JEED), implemented by the Human Resources Development Center on Productivity Improvement, aims to provide training for middle-aged and older persons working in small- and medium-sized enterprises to help them create post-retirement employment plans. Additionally, this programme comprises of an intergenerational initiative whereby older workers are trained to coach junior workers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Middle-aged and older workers who receive short, job-embedded training to upgrade skills, plan post-retirement pathways and stay employed up to age 70.

What were the results?

In 2024, 31.9% of Japanese employers secured job opportunities up to age 70, up from 29.7% in 2023, with SMEs leading at 32.4%.

How was it developed and implemented?

Delivered through Human Resources Productivity Support Centers at JEED Polytechnic Centers: 1) counseling & “Human Resources Training Plans,” 2) short skills-upgrade seminars for employees, 3) productivity-improvement training (explicitly including middle-aged and older employees and know-how transfer), and 4) dispatch of instructors and facility/equipment rental.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme is tailored to small and medium-sized enterprises, offering flexible, short-format courses and on-site support that align with real production schedules. Its intergenerational approach equips middle-aged and older workers to adapt to evolving roles while transferring skills to younger colleagues. JEED’s tools—including grants guidance, planning resources, and training—are closely aligned with Japan’s post-2021 legal framework to promote employment up to age 70. The initiative has achieved measurable progress, with steady annual growth in companies adopting age-70 employment measures between 2021 and 2024, demonstrating strong system-level impact.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Japan Organization for Employment of the Elderly, Persons with Disabilities and Job Seekers (JEED)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

Ibasho projects aim to create elder-led, socially integrated, and sustainable communities where older adults are respected and empowered to take leadership roles. Through placemaking and multigenerational engagement, these initiatives help shift perceptions of aging from decline to opportunity, fostering resilience and cultural continuity. Each project involves elders designing and managing community hubs that serve as spaces for social interaction, economic activity, and disaster recovery, with Ibasho providing technical support until the community becomes self-sufficient. It started in Japan in 2012 after the Great East Japan Earthquake, when older persons created and managed a hub with a café, garden, farmers’ market, daycare, evacuation center, and cultural teaching space. Since then, other projects were replicated after natural disasters, such as in the Philippines in 2014 after typhoon yolanda and in Nepal in 2015 after the earthquake. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older and younger persons in the respective communities benefit from stronger social ties. Older persons overall benefit from a changed image of ageing and older persons. 

What were the results?

In Japan, participation in the initiative led to a stronger sense of belonging in the community, according to a research study. In the Philippines and Nepal, quantitative research found that Ibasho significantly enhanced social ties among older persons. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed through a community-driven approach. The Ibasho project engaged with local communities to understand their needs, cultural context, and aspiration and jointly define their goals. The Ibasho team provides capacity-building. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice led to empowerment of older persons, changes the image of older persons and is an intergenerationanl project. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local community elders with the Ibasho team (NGO)
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Emergency situations (Natural disasters); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives, Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The Implementation Plan to Address Difficulties of the Elderly on the Use of Smart Technology, implemented in China by the General Office of the State Council, outlines recommendations to promote the digital literacy of older persons, namely helping individuals use smart technology and enhance their sense of inclusion and safety in the digital world.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries were older adults in China, particularly those with limited digital skills or access. The policy aimed to help them navigate smart technologies and access essential services like healthcare, transportation, and government support more easily.

What were the results?

The initiative ensures older persons’ access to essential services by retaining manual systems, enhancing digital interfaces with age-friendly features, and expanding nationwide volunteer and training programs, thereby promoting digital inclusion, autonomy, and social participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The policy was issued by the State Council in 2020 and coordinated across key ministries. Local governments adapted it through specific work plans—adding manual service counters, redesigning apps, and offering training. Tech companies supported implementation by upgrading platforms. Regular follow-ups ensured progress and consistency nationwide.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The policy is a good practice because it combined top-level coordination with local innovation to quickly close the digital gap for older adults. It ensured equal access to essential services during emergencies like COVID-19, promoted inclusive technology design, and launched sustainable training and volunteer programs. Its success has been widely recognized as a model for balancing digital advancement with social equity.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
General Office of the State Council
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The government provides social, medical and care services to vulnerable citizens, including to older persons. Older persons  who have reached the statutory retirement age, who are unable to care for themselves independently and who do not reside with able-bodied adult children or spouses are entitled to this service. The service includes assistance with paying bills, shopping, cooking, making medical appointments and reaching medical facilities, among others.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People requiring care in Kazakhstan, including children with disabilities and home-bound older persons without family caregiver. 

What were the results?

People who previously had no access to care—especially home‑bound older adults and persons with disabilities—are now eligible for state‑provided in‑home support.

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of home‑based services occurred alongside broader reforms aimed at improving social welfare, aligning with international standards, and addressing gaps in long‑term care.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The practice provides access to care, reaches vulnerable older persons and facilitates ageing in place. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.