Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 319 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

A law on state pension insurance, establishing the legal, economic, and organizational framework for the country’s pension system. It establishes a multi-tiered system depending on profession and ensures regulation, transparency, financial sustainability and social protection for ageing populations. This law creates a comprehensive contributory pension insurance system in Turkmenistan, combining mandatory, professional, and voluntary schemes to protect individuals against old age, disability, and loss of income.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All citizens in the labour force

How was it developed and implemented?

As part of broader social and economic reforms in the 2000s–early 2010s, the government decided to replace fragmented pension regulation with a single comprehensive law creating a state pension insurance system.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a good practice as it provides a legal foundation for comprehensive pension insurance in Turkmenistan. It promotes income security and social protection for all citizens as they reach pension age. 

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/3231

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Pension Fund operating under the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Turkmenistan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The Law of Georgia on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination is aimed at ensuring equal rights and eliminating discrimination in Georgia. The law prohibits all forms of discrimination based on  characteristics including age, race, sex and religion.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Based on Article 1, it includes every natural person in Georgia

What were the results?

Since the law’s adoption, the Public Defender (Ombudsperson) has received and processed a growing number of discrimination complaints each year. This reflects increased public awareness and institutional recognition of discrimination. Also, as a result, practical support mechanisms, such as a hotline, were introduced. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The law was issued by the Parliament of Georgia on 2 May 2014

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The law prohibits discrimination on grounds of age, and applies to social protection, healthcare, education and services.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Georgia
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination)
Country:
Georgia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2014
What was implemented?

A legal‑literacy programme for older people combined thematic lectures–seminars on issues such as housing and communal services, consumer rights, various scams, land rights, or how to contact regulatory authorities with printed handouts; a weekly legal clinic offering individual consultations and step‑by‑step guidance an outreach across numerous municipalities in Sverdlovsk Oblast, coordinated with local Social Protection Centers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries were older adults (predominantly 61–80+ years) identified as most vulnerable to rights violations, fraud, and information gaps; social workers also attended sessions to cascade knowledge to clients. Beneficiaries included residents of multiple municipalities.

What were the results?

Within a six‑month reporting period, the team held 26 consultation days (including remote) and provided legal help to 144 people; delivered 9 lectures–seminars on consumer rights to 190 participants, with additional seminar cycles later expanding participation; cumulative 2019 reporting (July–Dec) notes seminars in 12 municipalities with 259 attendees on housing and communal services topics and 66 attendees on consumer rights in December alone.

How was it developed and implemented?

The NGO prepared accessible educational content (brochures, presentations) tailored to typical rights issues facing older adults; established a weekly reception schedule for the legal clinic (including a remote format during COVID-19 restrictions); and co‑organized venues with municipal social‑protection institutions to reach residents, including those in small or remote settlements. The approach emphasized plain‑language explanations and practical algorithms of action for each case.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?
  • Evidence‑based local reach: multi‑municipality delivery with measured participation and consultations.
  • Actionable literacy: focus on everyday rights (housing/utilities, consumer protection, fraud prevention, land rights) plus step‑by‑step help via the legal clinic.
  • Inclusive access: printed materials for seniors who do not use the internet, and remote consultations when in‑person events were restricted.
  • Institutional anchoring: partnerships with social‑protection centres strengthened uptake and sustainability.
  • Grant backing and transparency: supported by the Presidential Grants Fund with published interim results.
Supporting documents:
View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
NGO 'Right to Protection and Assistance" and local Social Protection Centers
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect, Anti-discrimination); Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2019-2020
What was implemented?

The constitution of Azerbaijan guarantees equal rights for all (Article 25). The Azerbaijani State takes care of "improvement of prosperity of all people and each citizen, their social protection and proper living conditions." (Article 16)

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It creates legal obligations for the state to guarantee the rights of all and to provide social protection. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Azerbaijan
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Anti-discrimination); Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Azerbaijan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
1995
What was implemented?

Lifelong Learning Centre (L3C), a one‑stop information hub, provides access to lifelong learning programmes, including upskilling and reskilling opportunities for adults. It supports national talent development and encourages a culture of continuous learning.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Adult learners, including jobseekers, employees, and community members

What were the results?

The Centre expanded access to lifelong learning by offering structured programmes, short courses, industry engagement forums, and collaborations with public and private training providers. It strengthened national skills development, supported workforce readiness and increased enrolment in continuous learning programmes.

How was it developed and implemented?

L3C was developed by the Ministry of Education as part of a strategic initiative to build holistic individuals and an inclusive society. It established policies, frameworks, partnerships and governance mechanisms to ensure high‑quality, industry‑relevant training. The Centre also supports national agencies such as the Manpower Planning Office and the Brunei Employment Centre in aligning learning pathways with workforce needs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Centre strengthens lifelong learning culture, expands accessible learning opportunities and enhances employability. Its inclusive approach, partnerships and alignment with national development goals contribute to long‑term community well‑being.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Education
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Brunei Darussalam
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

The support allowance, which this statute refers to, consists in a sum of money paid from the State Budget to meet the basic needs of the aged and the disabled living in East Timor. The support allowance cannot be added up to other sums of money paid for social protection from the State Budget to the same beneficiary, which have a permanent nature and whose amount is higher than the amount of that one, whether they arise from the contributory regimes of social security system or from the non-contributory ones. Also defines the criteria involving the allowance grant, its amount and the possibility of this one's revision, the procedure ruling the application supporting documents, the decision and the decision impugnation, as well as the role of the organ in charge for the processing.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All older persons in Timor-Leste as it is a universal pension scheme. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Decree‑Law No. 19/2008 was developed in response to constitutional obligations requiring Timor‑Leste to provide social security and special protection for elderly people and persons with disabilities, grounded in Sections 56, 20, and 21 of the Constitution. Recognizing widespread poverty and the urgent need for targeted assistance, the Fourth Constitutional Government incorporated the establishment of a support allowance into its policy agenda. The drafting process involved extensive inter‑ministerial consultations among the ministries responsible for social protection, health, finance, and state administration to coordinate eligibility verification, medical certification, payment systems, and administrative structures. The decree also underwent detailed technical formulation covering eligibility criteria, benefit levels, application procedures, and appeals mechanisms, culminating in its formal approval by the Government under constitutional authority (Sections 115(j) and 116(d)) to establish a fully operational support allowance scheme.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides basic income security to all older persons in Timor-Leste. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry for Social Solidarity
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Timor-Leste
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2008
What was implemented?

The Long-Term Care (LTC) Insurance, implemented by the Government of the Republic of Korea and Ministry of Health and Welfare, is a social insurance scheme for elderly citizens. The scheme provides long-term care benefis to older persons experiencing difficulties with daily routines for six months or longer on account of old age or age-related diseases. The service includes home-based benefits, institution-based benefits and cash benefits when beneficiaries need to care for family members.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older adults and vulnerable community members, especially seniors enrolled in AI-IoT health management services.

What were the results?

In Uiwang City, AI-IoT health management raised healthy behavior improvement rates to 61.8%; in Taean County, mobile health services achieved 100% satisfaction and 78.1% behavior improvement.

How was it developed and implemented?

The program combined pre-visit education, training on digital devices, and AI-IoT/mobile platforms. Local health centers designed tailored “home visits + app-based” models to deliver continuous, community-based health monitoring.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It effectively integrates AI-IoT with community health services, producing measurable health gains among seniors — a scalable model of tech-enabled, inclusive care.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of the Republic of Korea, Ministry of Health and Welfare
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI), implemented by the International Institute for Population Sciences, is a national survey that aims to collect data on disease, mental health, functional health, health care and the social and economic well-being of older persons in India. Data is collected based on five key domains, namely, health, healthcare financing, social networks, economic aspects and older persons welfare programs.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Data users and policy makers

What were the results?

The programme generated a nationally representative longitudinal survey of over 70,000 mid-aged and older adults, strengthening evidence on health, economic, and social well-being of India’s ageing population. It advanced research capacity and informed policy decisions on ageing and elder care (IIPS).

How was it developed and implemented?

Commissioned by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, IIPS led the project in collaboration with Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and USC. Data collection applied stratified multistage sampling, CAPI-based interviews, and biomarker measures, ensuring scientific rigor, cross-country comparability, and public data availability.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It established India’s first nationally representative longitudinal ageing study. Ensures internationally comparable, publicly accessible data that strengthens evidence-based policy and research.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
International Institute for Population Sciences
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
India
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2017- 2018 (Wave 1), 2024 - 2025 (Wave 2)
What was implemented?

The Longitudinal Study of Ageing and Health in the Philippines (LSAHP), implemented by the Demographic Research and Development Foundation, aims to investigate health status and well-being of older persons and to assess the determinants and transitions in health status and overall well-being. Subsequent rounds of the LSAHP aims to improve the understanding behind the trajectory of ageing in the nation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Data users and policy makers

What were the results?

Using a survey sample of 5,985 older Filipinos aged 60+, data was generated identifying widespread noncommunicable diseases, functional decline, and economic vulnerability.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by DRDF with ERIA support, LSAHP used a multi-stage national sampling design. Baseline data were collected in 2018, followed by a second wave in 2023, tracking survival, health, and socioeconomic conditions, including COVID-19 impacts. It is the first nationally representative longitudinal study on aging in the Philippines.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides the first robust longitudinal evidence on ageing in the Philippines, ensuring data-driven policies and programs that enhance well-being and inclusion of older persons.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Demographic Research and Development Foundation
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The Malaysia Disaster Management Reference Handbook provides information for planners and operators have a baseline of knowledge to support disaster management (DM) engagement with Malaysian stakeholders. It specifically mentions older persons as a vulnerable group that requires consideration in planning. It also raises the population ageing needs to be considered in infrastructure planning through age-friendly infrastructure. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

The whole population of Malaysia, including vulnerable groups such as older persons

What were the results?

The handbook outlines the country's hazard exposure, vulnerabilities, and coping capacities, and highlights the role of the National Disaster Management Agency (NADMA) in coordinating national disaster management activities. It also discusses the impact of various hazards, such as floods, landslides, and droughts, and the importance of a shared response approach among government, NGOs, and communities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of the Malaysia Disaster Management Reference Handbook involved a collaborative effort to gather information from public domain resources, local and government sources, and subject matter experts.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The handbook is designed to be informative, relevant, reliable, and useful in understanding disaster management and response. It is an example of including "ageing" in disaster management. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Disaster Management Agency (NADMA) of Malaysia
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters)
Country:
Malaysia
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2022

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.