Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 319 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

A federal legal framework establishing the rights, welfare mechanisms, and protection measures for senior citizens in the Capital Territory. The act provides for welfare councils, protection from neglect and abuse, and measures to support the social, medical, and economic well-being of older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in the Islamabad Capital Territory

How was it developed and implemented?

It was developed through legislative processes under the Government of Pakistan, with the Ministry of Human Rights leading the drafting. Implementation relies on coordination with provinces and the establishment of designated bodies and welfare mechanisms under the act.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This is a good practice as it provides a rights-based legal framework, formalising older persons rights ensuring they are addressed outside of just charity -based support. It is sustainable as it embeds responsibilities within government structures rather than short-term projects.

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Government of Pakistan, led by the Ministry of Human Rights Pakistan with coordination across authorities.
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect); Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Pakistan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

JEED (Japan Organization for Employment of the Elderly, Persons with Disabilities and Job Seekers) runs a comprehensive set of employment support services for older workers, aimed at extending working lives, improving workplace conditions, and helping companies adapt to an aging workforce. JEED provides financial support to employers to help them continue employing older workers, runs public awareness activities to promote age‑friendly workplaces and provides vocational training for reemployment. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons and persons with disabilities seeking to participate in the labour force. 

What were the results?

Resulting from the activities of JEED, employment of older persons and persons with disabilities has increased. 

How was it developed and implemented?

JEED emerged from other governmental agencies, adapted to the needs of an ageing society. 

JEED is a governmental independent administrative agency, funded by the Government of Japan. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It focuses on employment of vulnerable groups who are often discriminated in the labour market. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Employment Security Bureau
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment, Life-long learning)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

Core implementation is a home‑care and social support model for vulnerable older adults, expanded through 15+ charitable programmes: in‑home care for the elderly; post‑stroke rehabilitation; purchasing essential household/medical items; and urgent material assistance. The foundation also delivers community activities (e.g., caregiver training, cultural events) and volunteer programmes targeting silver‑age volunteers to reduce isolation via “Telephone Friend.”

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary/initial beneficiaries were elderly and needy Jews in Moscow; the organization is explicitly a Regional Public Jewish Charitable Foundation and continues to emphasize the Jewish community (including Holocaust remembrance and cultural programming). 

What were the results?

The foundation’s model delivers holistic, sustained outcomes for vulnerable older adults in Moscow: it keeps people safely at home through ongoing home‑care and social support, reduces isolation by engaging “silver‑age” volunteers and maintaining regular contact (e.g., the “Telephone Friend” initiative), and builds family capacity via practical trainings for relatives of people with limited mobility—together strengthening day‑to‑day functioning, safety, and dignity for beneficiaries. At the system level, the organization demonstrates continuity and integration—it communicates with city social‑protection processes, sustains volunteer intakes and community events across the year.

How was it developed and implemented?

The practice grew from synagogue‑based volunteer aid into a registered, city‑recognized provider. Over time it consolidated home‑based assistance as a priority and added specialized programmes (rehabilitation, equipment purchases, urgent support). The foundation actively recruits and trains volunteers, hosts public events, and maintains coordination with city social services—for example, public notices about independent quality assessments in the social sector and training workshops for relatives of home‑bound clients. Operational and financial sustainability is supported by recurring donations via the SberTogether platform, with published quarterly reports on purchased medical supplies for specific beneficiaries.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It stands out for its longevity and institutionalization: operating continuously since 1991, it has evolved into a structured, multi‑programme charitable foundation with city‑level recognition and a diversified portfolio of services. Its approach is home‑based and needs‑driven, prioritizing in‑home care and targeted purchases of medical and household essentials that directly support daily functioning and dignity for frail older adults. The model also mobilizes volunteers and supports family caregivers, recruiting “silver‑age” volunteers (for example, the “Telephone Friend” initiative) and running practical workshops—such as safe transfer techniques for relatives of people with limited mobility—which strengthen social connectedness and improve care quality. Finally, its transparency and accountability are demonstrated through regular donation reports on SberTogether that specify exactly which medical consumables were purchased and for whom, reinforcing donor trust and programme continuity.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
The practice is implemented by the Regional Public Jewish Charitable Foundation “Ruka pomoshi” (РОЕБФ «Рука помощи») in Moscow.
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1991 - ongoing
What was implemented?

''Kaigo' means nursing or caregiving in Japanese.  Kaigo cafe began as a gathering at a café in Tokyo where people working in the care industry could come together to share their experiences and discuss issues and concerns in the field. Since its establishment, it has grown into a large community of care workers in Japan. The community provides spaces for care workers nationwide to connect and offers support for their careers and other concerns through diverse online and offline events.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Individuals working in the care industry, including managers, caregivers, and students.

What were the results?

As of 2025, more than 40,000 care industry workers were involved in this community.

How was it developed and implemented?

The get-together is held once a month at a café in Tokyo. Local communities also organize events in their own areas. Additionally, they provide activities that go beyond just gathering. These include off-site events and collaborations with schools and government entities. For example, they provide places for those studying in this sector, and they support people who want to start businesses in the care sector by connecting them with business partners.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This network brings together professionals in the care industry to address the concerns and problems they face. Networking benefits not only the workers, but also the industry and the care recipients at large.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Mirai wo Tsukuru Kaigo Café
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

Kampung Admirality is a public residenial project in Singapore, implemented by Ministry of Health and Early Childhood Development Agency. The residential project consists of two 11-storey blocks with 104 studio apartments, integrating intergenerational amenities between commercial, leisure and residential spaces. This project was the first to combine childcare, senior centres and community plazas within a single complex, with the aim of preventing social isolation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Residents of Singapore—especially seniors in Woodlands—benefited from on-site housing, healthcare, social, and community facilities. The co-location integrates services for elderly care, childcare, retail, and communal activities into one accessible complex.

What were the results?

The programme engaged over 200 senior volunteers, hosted 190+ intergenerational activities, fostering inclusion and active ageing. It now serves as a national model for integrated eldercare design.

How was it developed and implemented?

Kampung Admiralty was developed by Singapore’s Housing & Development Board (HDB) and designed by WOHA from 2013, completed in 2017. Located next to Woodlands MRT on a compact 0.9-hectare site, it uses a vertical “club sandwich” model to stack diverse public functions. Universal design and sustainability were integral, including natural ventilation, rainwater collection, and green roofs. A multi-agency team, including HDB and the People’s Association, oversees integrated programming and daily operations.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It offers an innovative model for ageing-in-place by combining housing, healthcare, and community services in a compact, inclusive, and sustainable vertical village.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Health, Early Childhood Development Agency
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

Kochi Spotlight is an open mic event held twice a month at various parks. It aims to promote social cohesion and strengthen intergenerational bonds. With storytelling, music, poetry, cultural performances and more, this event celebrates the importance of the elderly population in Kochi and tackle ageist stereotypes. This event is also used as a space to share the achievements of elderly people and recognize their contributions to the community.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All participating generations in Kochi

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The intergenerational nature of this programme makes it a good practice, by sharing an event, both the young and old can become more acquainted and tackle stereotypes. Additionally, this event is highly replicable in any other setting.

Supporting documents:

https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/afp/intergenerational-open-mic-program-kochi-spotlight/

View More
Who implemented it?
Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Age-Friendly Kochi City Program, coordinated by the Center for Excellence for Developing Age-Friendly Communities (CEDAC)
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives, Participation of older persons)
Country:
India
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The Korean Longitudinal Study on Ageing is conducted regularly to collect data on the situation of older persons in the Republic of Korea. The purpose of KLoSA is to create the basic data needed to devise and implement effective social, economic policies to address the trends that emerge in the process of population ageing.
The data will help identify and observe different dimensions of an aged society, build datasets that enable studies in different fields, and generate data comparable with similar panel studies in other countries (eg. U.S., Europe) that can provide the basis for policy-making and academic studies.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The main beneficiaries are policymakers who will be able to design evidence-based policies through accurate data on an aged society and the situation of older persons. Other beneficiaries are civil society and academia. 

What were the results?

The report’s evidence-based assessment marked the first targeted evaluation of health system readiness for ageing populations in the Pacific, helping the Ministry of Health and NCOP pinpoint critical policy, program, and service gaps.

How was it developed and implemented?

The sampling frame of KLoSA comprises enumeration districts (EDs), as identified by the National Statistical Office’s 2005 Census. Under this frame, Apartment EDs and Ordinary housing (non-apartment) EDs totalled 261,237, excluding island areas and institutions (social welfare facilities). For Wave One, 1,000 sample EDs were selected, with the aim of securing a maximum valid sample size of 10,000 persons, from six households per sample ED. This was decided on the basis of the fact that the average number of household members aged 45 and over was 1.67 in the 2000 Census.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Collecting reliable disaggregated data on ageing is an action area in the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Korea Employment Information Service
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2006
What was implemented?

This programme helps seniors who have been abused by their family members but do not wish to get law enforcement involved. It is a model where seniors and family members can meet in a moderated setting to speak and acknowledge the harm they have been through. The aim is to help seniors repair  relationship with family members and create formal plans to move forward (Safety and Care Plan) without having to involve law enforcement.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in New Zealand

What were the results?

92% of participants reported they felt heard and safer than if they had gone through the route of calling police and using criminal justice processes.

How was it developed and implemented?

This programme was developed through an action-research initiative, aiming to find a solution for victims who do not want to call police on their family. Specially trained mediators implemented this programme alongside social workers.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme respects the seniors decisions to keep their family ties intact while at the same time tacking and hopefully ending their abuse. The talking circle tactic is culturally relevant and is highly effective for indigenous communities within New Zealand.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Victoria University of Wellington in partnership with the Regional Elder Abuse Response Services and the Office for Seniors
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Law and Action Plan, implemented by the Government of Kyrgyzstan and Office of the Prime Minister, aims to ensure a safe and dignified life for older persons in the Kyrgyz Republic. This plan includes a Financial Plan and a Matrix of Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators. The main focus areas of the plan are: equality and non-discrimination, improved access to quality health services for elderly citizens through improved health care and promotion of active ageing, ensured well-being at all life cycle stages, poverty reduction among older citizens and ensured access to public and minicipal services for older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are older citizens of the Kyrgyz Republic—persons aged 60 and above (women from 58, men from 63 as per national definition)—targeting their social protection, health care access, and inclusion.

What were the results?

The programme expanded community social service delivery: 6,075 people received social services during 2019–2020, including 840 elderly citizens.

How was it developed and implemented?

Development began with a UN-supported national demographic and needs survey, followed by policy drafting by an inter-agency working group including the National Statistics Committee and Ministry of Social Development; the action plan was then formally adopted via government decree, with mandated reporting, monitoring, and financial plans established.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is a good practice because it was evidence-based, multi-sectoral, and rights-oriented, with clear monitoring and implementation mechanisms, demonstrating measurable early impact.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government, Office of the Prime Minister
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Kyrgyzstan
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

This law defines the state policy on older persons. It is aimed at creating  conditions for older persons to live full lives, participate in economic and political activities, and fulfill their civic duties. The law establishes key concepts such as gerontological services, defines older persons (men aged 63 and older, women aged 58 and older), and outlines social services for senior citizens. The law focuses on creating enabling legal and socio-economic conditions and guarantees a dignified life, development, and self-realization of senior citizens, protecting their rights and legitimate interests. Priority areas include improving the quality of health care and social support services, and ensuring access to information and education, employment, sports, and culture. The law enshrines the social rights and guarantees of older persons, including the right to receive social services, various types of social protection such as pensions, social benefits, home care and institutional care, as well as the right to medical care, education, vocational training, and access to cultural events. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Kyrgyzstan

What were the results?

The law created a state policy foundation defining older persons, gerontological services, and the responsibilities of the state toward them. This formalized ageing as a public policy area and enabled nationwide planning and programme development.

How was it developed and implemented?

Before 2011, Kyrgyzstan lacked comprehensive age‑specific equality legislation. UN treaty bodies and human rights mechanisms repeatedly recommended creation of a national legal framework addressing rights, social protection, and services for older persons. The 2011 law emerged as the policy instrument intended to fill this gap.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Law on Older Citizens has produced system‑level results, including the creation of a coherent national ageing policy framework, standardization of eligibility criteria, expansion of social services, integration of ageing concerns across sectoral laws, and alignment with international ageing agendas.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labor and Social Development of the Kyrgyz Republic, and other relevant ministries
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Kyrgyzstan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2011

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.