Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The Caregivers Allowance in the Cook Islands is a government welfare payment that provides financial support to adults aged 18 and over—regardless of nationality—who reside in the Cook Islands and care for an older person, a person with a disability, or a child with high care needs. Caregivers must not be in full-time employment, and eligible recipients receive $100 NZD twice monthly.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Caregivers

What were the results?

A multi‑programme evaluation (UNICEF, 2020) found that the caregiver allowance—alongside other social cash transfers—plays a critical role in reducing poverty, vulnerability, and risk, especially in households caring for elderly, disabled, or dependent persons. It contributes significantly to household welfare in both Rarotonga and the Pa Enua

How was it developed and implemented?

The development of the Caregivers Allowance in the Cook Islands is rooted in the country’s long-standing, tax‑financed social protection system, which began expanding significantly from the 1960s onward, and formally included a caregiver payment by the time the Welfare Act 1989 was established. This Act created the structural basis for multiple welfare payments—including those for older persons, persons with disabilities, and caregivers—and embedded the principle that the state should support families caring for vulnerable members. Over the decades, the allowance evolved through continuous policy refinement driven by government reviews, parliamentary oversight, and social‑sector evaluations. By 2017, the Caregivers Policy and its administration were scrutinized in a Public Accounts Committee inquiry, which examined implementation quality, eligibility rules, and payment mechanisms—showing active policy shaping and administrative strengthening.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It values caregivers and provides social protection. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Internal Affairs
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Cook Islands
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
1989
What was implemented?

The Carer Payment Initiative, implemented by national and local Australian Governments, provides payment to individuals who care for disabled, unwell or elderly individuals. This payment is provided to carers who have provided constant care for a minimum of six months, minimising the impact that caring for a family member has on earning income.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries are carers (often family members) providing constant care to people with disability, severe illness, or frailty who cannot support themselves independently.

What were the results?

The program supported a rapidly growing carer population. Recipients rose from about 57,800 in 2001 to 301,200 in June 2022, increasing from 0.4% to 1.4% of the population aged 16+. In 2025, reforms allowed carers to work up to 100 hours every 4 weeks, offering greater flexibility and improving labour market participation.

How was it developed and implemented?

Established under the Social Security Act, administered by Services Australia. A 2008 review expanded eligibility to parents of children with severe disability, adding ~19,000 new recipients. Implementation has relied on legislative adjustments and regular updates to reflect carers’ evolving needs.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides long-term, responsive support to carers while adapting rules to promote inclusion, sustainability, and work-life balance.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1985
What was implemented?

In Japan, the “Club of Friendship between Generations in Akita”, implemented by the local community, brings together an intergenerational group of individuals in their 20s to those in their 80s to encourage friendships and enhance social networks across generations. The club provides community spaces for residents to meet, form friendships and participate in social activities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older residents of Akita City, Japan—particularly senior citizens facing barriers to mobility, social engagement, and access to services due to demographic ageing and youth out‑migration.

What were the results?

Recognised as an “Age-Friendly City” in 2019 and honouring “Aging-Friendly Partners” by 2025, the city strengthened public–private collaboration and fostered a more inclusive environment for seniors.

How was it developed and implemented?

Akita City, a WHO Global Network member since 2011, has advanced age-friendly initiatives such as a one-coin bus service (launched 2011, expanded 2017) to improve elderly mobility, the intergenerational “Club of Friendship Between Generations” to strengthen social ties, and a multi-generational city hall built in 2016 with universal design features like concierge support, wheelchair paths, and heated floors/roads for winter safety. It also formalized an Age-Friendly Partner program engaging local businesses and institutions in senior support.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Akita City has advanced age-friendliness through integrated efforts in transport, infrastructure, governance, and community programs, combining accessible design with social engagement. Since joining the WHO network in 2011, it has sustained and expanded services, built public–private partnerships, and introduced tailored solutions—such as heated mobility paths and low-cost transport—to meet local ageing and winter-related challenges.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Local community
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

The Center for Ageing Support and Community Development (CASCD), implemented by the Viet Nam Red Cross Society, is a non-governmental organization that works to support older persons, individuals impacted by HIV/AIDS, poor women and people with disabilities. It promotes community care through both paid and volunteer programmes, offering services such as intergenerational self-hubs and advocacy for the rights of older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The programme primarily benefits older people in Vietnam, especially those in rural and underserved communities. It promotes their social inclusion, health, and economic resilience through community-led initiatives.

What were the results?

In 2025, a national expansion plan targets 12,000 ISHCs, aiming to support hundreds of thousands of older adults across the country HelpAge International. Additionally, since 2021, 186 new ISHCs supported by the World Bank and JSDF have benefited 24,725 older persons.

How was it developed and implemented?

CASCD began by mobilizing older people into grassroots associations. With support from HelpAge and the government, the model evolved into Intergenerational Self-Help Clubs (ISHCs)—providing services ranging from home care and microfinance to health screening and legal aid. The model is now part of Vietnam’s national ageing strategy.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It is community-owned, cost-effective, and highly scalable, empowering older adults as both beneficiaries and leaders. The model successfully integrates health, income, care, and rights—addressing ageing in a holistic way.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Vietnam Red Cross Society
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Viet Nam
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1991
What was implemented?

Singapore established a network of centre-based community care services to support older persons with varying care needs while enabling them to remain in the community. Coordinated by the Agency for Integrated Care (AIC), the services include day care, dementia day care, community rehabilitation and Active Ageing Centres (Care). These centres provide supervision, nursing care, rehabilitation, personal care, meals, social and recreational activities, and caregiver support, helping older persons maintain their physical, cognitive and social well-being.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons who require supervision, rehabilitation or long-term care services, including persons living with dementia, as well as their caregivers.

What were the results?

The initiative expanded access to community-based long-term care by providing coordinated day care, rehabilitation and dementia care services across Singapore. It supports ageing in place, helps maintain older persons' physical and cognitive functioning, and provides respite and support for family caregivers through an integrated national referral and subsidy system.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Agency for Integrated Care coordinates referrals, eligibility assessment and access to centre-based care services through hospitals, polyclinics and AIC Link centres. Community care providers deliver standardized services, including rehabilitation, nursing care, dementia care, personal care and social engagement programmes. Government subsidies are available through means testing to improve affordability, while the national coordination model enables consistent service quality and equitable access across Singapore.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The initiative integrates health, rehabilitation and social care into a coordinated community-based long-term care system. By combining national coordination, standardized referral pathways, financial support and multidisciplinary services, it enables older persons to remain in their communities while reducing reliance on institutional care. Its integrated service model is scalable and readily adaptable to other ageing societies

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Agency for Integrated Care (AIC), Ministry of Health (MOH), together with community care providers
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

Charo Wongdo is a private elderly care initiative, where professional caregivers become 'care buddies' to an elderly. The founders identified a gap in elder care. The services provided include: assistance with daily hygiene, meal prep, medication administering, help with transport to hospital appointments, and emotional companionship.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Bhutan

What were the results?

This programme has led to a significant reduction in the number of missed appointments at the hospital, as caregivers are there to ensure they make it. The initiative also created jobs for youth who were abroad and came back to Bhutan with experience working in aged societies.  

How was it developed and implemented?

Founders of this initiative saw an increase of Bhutanese moving abroad and leaving their older family members behind. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice values the Bhutanese value of loyalty and gratitude into a professional service for elderly. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Private Sector that operates with government approval
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Support to caregivers)
Country:
Bhutan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

The Multi-Generation Entrepreneur Development Education Ecosystem or MEEDEE for short is an online-based learning tool that is combined with in-person teaching to provide lifelong-learning opportunities for older persons. MEEDEE provides more than 30 courses designed to equip older persons with digital literacy and occupational skills, enabling them to establish online businesses and generate income. The courses are offered free of charge and the emphasis is on practical skills. It also offers courses on financial management and on physical and mental health, supporting older persons to remain self-reliant and fulfilled as they age.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons looking to improve their digital and income-generation skills.

What were the results?

By end of 2024, over 21000 older persons have undergone MEEDEE training.

How was it developed and implemented?

As Thailand is moving from an "aged" to a "super-aged" society, the working-aged population is declining and more people will have to work longer. However, many Thais worked most of their life in the informal economy and lack the skills to participate in the new digital economy. MEEDEE aims to close this gap through trainings offered via the free and in Thailand very popular instant messaging application "LINE" - as older persons would likely already be familiar with using it. Additionally, MEEDEE has partnered with over 2500 schools for older persons and with more than 70 government, private sector, and community organizations to provide in-person training. MEEDEE also operates online and in-person market places and supports users wishing to participate in them. MEEDEE not only teaches older persons new skills, but encourages them to participate in peer education, and for this has established a group of over 1000 "MEEDEE Certified Trainers" where older persons are involved in curriculum development and teaching. In 2021, MEEDEE spent approximately 100000 USD to develop and roll-out the programme. The goal is to have MEEDEE's funding covered through corporate social responsibility and marketing and product development resources.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

MEEDEE's blended learning model with both online and occasional on-site learning is very cost-effective in providing comprehensive education for older persons.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Chiang Mai University
Categories:
Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Intergenerational initiatives); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) is a nationally representative longitudinal survey established to collect high-quality data on Chinese residents aged 45 years and above. The survey gathers information on health status, healthcare utilization, employment, retirement, income, pensions, family support and living conditions. Conducted through regular follow-up surveys, CHARLS provides a comprehensive evidence base for research and policymaking on population ageing, health, and social protection in China.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers and all data users

What were the results?

The survey has supported extensive research on healthy ageing, retirement, long-term care, pensions and socioeconomic wellbeing, and its datasets are publicly available for academic research.

How was it developed and implemented?

CHARLS has established one of China's leading longitudinal datasets on ageing, covering approximately 10,000 households and 17,500 individuals across 150 counties and 450 communities. The survey has supported extensive research on healthy ageing, retirement, long-term care, pensions and socioeconomic wellbeing, and its datasets are publicly available for academic research.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

CHARLS demonstrates the value of long-term, nationally representative data for supporting evidence-informed policymaking on population ageing. Its standardized methodology, regular follow-up surveys and publicly accessible datasets make it a sustainable and highly replicable model for strengthening ageing research and policy development.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
National School of Development, Peking University
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2011
What was implemented?

 China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (CLASS) is a nationwide longitudinal survey designed to systematically collect individual- and community-level data on older persons in China. The survey collects information on older persons’ demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, physical and mental health, social security, employment, family and intergenerational support, social participation, access to community services, and preferences and needs for old-age care. CLASS is designed not only to monitor the circumstances and needs of older persons over time, but also to assess the effectiveness of social policies in improving their quality of life and provide an empirical basis for ageing-related research and policymaking.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Researchers, policymakers, public authorities and organizations involved in ageing-related policy and service planning.

What were the results?

The first nationwide baseline survey was conducted in 2014 across 28 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, covering 134 counties or districts and 462 villages or communities. It produced 11,511 valid individual questionnaires and 462 community questionnaires. The baseline data were weighted using China's Sixth National Population Census and were designed to provide estimates of the circumstances of persons aged 60 and above in mainland China. The survey generated evidence on health and functional ability, pensions and economic security, family care, social participation, housing, community elderly care and health services, among other areas. The resulting data and research outputs have been made available to support academic research and ageing-related policymaking.

How was it developed and implemented?

CLASS conducted pilot surveys in 2011 and 2012 before launching its first nationwide baseline survey in 2014. The national survey uses a stratified, multi-stage probability sampling design and collects information through both individual and community questionnaires. Field implementation is organized through a three-level management structure comprising the central CLASS project office at Renmin University, regional project offices and field sampling and interviewing teams. Quality assurance combines field supervision, remote data analysis and telephone verification. Following data collection, the data undergo cleaning, weighting and documentation before being made available for research use.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

CLASS provides a systematic evidence base for understanding population ageing and evaluating ageing-related policies rather than relying solely on administrative statistics or one-time surveys. Its longitudinal design allows changes in older persons’ circumstances and needs to be monitored over time, while the combination of individual- and community-level data connects personal outcomes with local service environments. Its probability sampling, standardized data collection, quality-control mechanisms and public availability for academic research strengthen the reliability and wider use of the evidence generated. The approach demonstrates how longitudinal ageing data can support evidence-based policymaking and policy evaluation.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Renmin University of China, with the survey designed by its ageing research team and implemented through the university's survey research infrastructure and collaborating research institutions. The project has been supported by the Renmin University of Ch
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2014
What was implemented?

The Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) is a nationwide longitudinal survey established in 1998 to generate evidence on healthy ageing and longevity in China. The survey collects data on the health status, functional ability, family support, socioeconomic conditions, lifestyles, and quality of life of older persons aged 65 years and above. Covering 22 provinces and approximately 85% of China's population, the dataset provides an important evidence base for ageing-related research and policy development.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All data users, including policymakers; researchers; public health and ageing institutions.

What were the results?

The CLHLS has become one of the world's largest longitudinal studies on older persons and has generated extensive evidence on healthy ageing, longevity, disability, family support, and long-term care. Its publicly available data have supported numerous national and international studies and informed ageing-related policies in China.

How was it developed and implemented?

The survey was established to better understand the determinants of healthy longevity among older persons in China. It follows a nationally representative cohort of older adults through repeated survey waves, collecting demographic, health, social, behavioural, and family information using standardized questionnaires. The data are regularly updated, quality controlled, and made available to researchers to support evidence-based policymaking and research on population ageing.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The CLHLS provides a robust, long-term evidence base for ageing research and policy development through nationally representative longitudinal data. Its standardized methodology, open data access, and sustained implementation make it a highly replicable model for strengthening evidence-informed policymaking in ageing societies.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Center for Healthy Aging and Development Studies, Peking University, in collaboration with Duke University and other research partners.
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
1998 - ongoing

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.