Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The foundation implemented a comprehensive, multi‑level system of support for older people and people with disabilities, aimed at improving their quality of life and ensuring dignity in old age. Its activities include addressing basic needs, providing care, ensuring access to medical and social support, organizing meaningful communication and leisure, and improving living conditions in residential care institutions and for older people living at home. Over time, the foundation’s work evolved from direct assistance into a broader effort to help build sustainable systems of long‑term care and social support in the Russian Federation.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are older people and people with disabilities, including residents of nursing homes and residential social institutions; as well as older people living alone or at home who require support due to limited mobility or health conditions. Secondary beneficiaries include families of older people, volunteers, and local communities involved in care and support activities. The foundation’s work covers hundreds of residential care institutions and reaches beneficiaries across many regions of the Russian Federation.

What were the results?

As a result of the foundation’s work hundreds of residential institutions across the Russian Federation receive ongoing support. Thousands of older people benefit from improved care, better living conditions, medical and hygiene support, and regular communication. Older people experience reduced isolation and improved emotional wellbeing through contact with volunteers and participation in social activities. Also, public awareness of the challenges of ageing and long‑term care has increased, helping to shift societal attitudes toward greater respect, solidarity, and responsibility for older generations.

How was it developed and implemented?

The foundation developed its activities from a volunteer movement launched in 2007 into a registered charitable foundation in 2011, combining grassroots engagement with institutional capacity. Implementation relies on direct targeted assistance in institutions and at home; engagement, training, and coordination of volunteers; cooperation with state authorities, businesses, and non‑governmental organizations; and development of methodological and educational materials, including training programmes for long‑term care and social service professionals. This combination allows the foundation to address immediate needs while also contributing to long‑term systemic improvements in older persons' care.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The foundation’s work integrates direct care, emotional support, and systemic change within one model; places human dignity, communication, and meaningful social connection at the center of older persons' care; combines volunteerism with professional expertise and institutional partnerships; operates at scale while maintaining individual, needs‑based support; and contributes to the development of long‑term care approaches that can be replicated by public institutions and other organizations.

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
charitable foundation "Starost v Radost" ("Old age is a joy")
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Participation of older persons, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2007
What was implemented?

A residents-only digital citizen portal that uses the My Number Card to provide dementia prevention, health promotion, and learning services through a unified digital ID.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Local residents of Miyakonojo City, especially older adults at risk of dementia.

What were the results?

Within one month of launch, over 200 residents across multiple age groups registered and used the services, demonstrating cross-generational adoption and strong local engagement.

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was developed using a national smart city data integration framework, linking services to the My Number Card and issuing a city-specific digital ID (“Miyakonojo ID”) for access via smartphones.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It demonstrates how a government-backed digital ID platform can deliver personalized, preventive health services at the local level while remaining scalable nationwide.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Miyakonojo City Government through the Miyakonojo Smart City Promotion Council.
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.