Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust has partnered with Hong Kong’s four gerontology research institutes to implement the Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project (“JCAFC Project”) since 2015. The JCAFC Project aimed to promote an age-friendly culture in all 18 districts of Hong Kong. A unique model of bottom-up, district-based, multi-sectoral collaboration and evidence-based approach were adopted in building Hong Kong to an age-friendly city (“AFC”) which can cater for the needs of different ages. The book “Strategies for Creating an Age-friendly City: Hong Kong as a case study” thoroughly chronicles the strategies adopted by Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project in advancing age-friendly city movement in Hong Kong and its social impact, explores the origins of the concept of an age-friendly city and its development globally and in Hong Kong, as well as provides recommendations for the future advancement of age-friendly cities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The main beneficiaries are local governments and district councils who can use the guidebook to plan and implement age-friendly policies and programmes. Community organizations and NGOs can further benefit from it. 

What were the results?

The guidebook informed district-level planning and contributed to a broader age-friendly city strategy in Hong Kong, China.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Age-Friendly City Case Book was developed under the Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project (JCAFC) through a collaborative, evidence-based process involving academic institutions, NGOs, and government agencies. It draws on five years of research and community engagement across Hong Kong’s 18 districts, including baseline assessments, surveys, and focus groups to identify local needs. The guidebook consolidates global and local best practices, practical tools, and templates for planning, implementing, and evaluating age-friendly initiatives. Its goal is to provide actionable resources for policymakers and communities to create inclusive, supportive environments for older adults.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides a comprehensive toolkit—including assessment questionnaires, focus group protocols, and action-plan templates—that local governments and NGOs can use to implement age-friendly initiatives. Thus, it supports evidence-based policymaking and forms a basis for designing age-friendly cities. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
CUHK Jockey Club Institute of Ageing
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Hong Kong, China
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The study conducted a qualitative evaluation to understand the policy context and lived experiences of ageing in Vanuatu. Researchers used a combination of policy mapping and semi‑structured interviews with 42 older ni‑Vanuatu adults to examine how national policies align with the needs and priorities of the ageing population. The analysis was guided by the WHO Regional Action Plan on Healthy Ageing in the Western Pacific. The research explored: (1) existing national policy commitments related to ageing, (2) gaps in explicit ageing‑related frameworks, (3) barriers older people face—including financial hardship, limited community support, and barriers to participation—and (4) strategic entry points for developing a national healthy‑ageing response. The study ultimately identified the need for improved evidence generation, stronger community engagement, culturally grounded approaches, and greater policy coordination to support healthy ageing in Vanuatu.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers in Vanuatu who benefit from evidence on ageing and the situation of older persons in Vanuatu. 

What were the results?

The study generated primary data on the situation of older persons in Vanuatu. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The research was conducted using a qualitative, multi‑method approach designed to understand both the policy environment and the lived experiences of older people in Vanuatu.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
The George Institute, Vanuatu Ministry of Health
Categories:
Data and research (Research paper/study)
Country:
Vanuatu
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

YADES is a national support programme launched in 2016 by the Ministry of Family and Social Services to help older persons live independently in their homes and communities through bio-psycho-social support, home care, technical assistance, and psychosocial services. YADES operates via municipalities under provincial supervision, funded 60% by the national budget and 40% by local co-financing, with 91 projects implemented between 2016–2024, benefiting over 159,000 older persons. The program emphasizes local ownership, community-based care, technology-driven safety solutions, and sustainability, aiming to improve quality of life, promote active ageing, and strengthen family-focused social work.

What were the results?

As of 2024, the following results were achieved:
91 projects were implemented across 54 municipalities under the program.

  • A total of 64.3 million TL was allocated to fund these initiatives.
  • 159,189 older persons received support, covering 106,069 households.
  • Services included psychosocial support, home care, technical assistance, mobile teams, and coordination centers.
  • The program strengthened local capacity, promoted community-based care, and introduced technology-supported models (e.g., smart monitoring systems for safety).
  • Key achievements: improved quality of life, active ageing, family-focused social work, and sustainability through co-financing and local ownership.
How was it developed and implemented?

The YADES program was developed by Türkiye’s Ministry of Family and Social Services in 2016 as a response to the country’s rapidly ageing population and growing care needs. It was designed as the first large-scale national grant program in the field of ageing, financed through the state budget and implemented by municipalities under provincial supervision.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

YADES promotes community-based care and "ageing in place", allowing older persons to remain in their own homes and cared by communities. It promotes local ownership as it is implemented by municipalities. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Family and Social Services with local governments and minicipalities
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2016 (initiated)
What was implemented?

The national dementia plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran places strong emphasis on supporting caregivers, recognizing them as central to ensuring quality care for people living with dementia. It adopts a family‑ and community‑centred approach, ensuring caregivers receive education, practical tools, and emotional support to manage the complex demands of dementia care.

1. The plan commits to raising awareness and empowering families. It provides structured caregiver education on understanding dementia, communication strategies, behavioural management, and self‑care. Specific materials support caregivers in recognizing symptoms, planning routines, and applying environmental modifications to reduce stress and confusion for the patient. Caregivers receive guidance on using memory aids, maintaining daily structure, managing safety risks, and understanding disease progression. 

2. The plan provides training for non‑professional caregivers, enabling them to deliver basic rehabilitative interventions. This includes support for assisting with activities of daily living, facilitating cognitive exercises, ensuring safe mobility, and incorporating compensatory strategies in daily routines. Caregivers are taught how to support independence while preventing hazards, including fall‑prevention techniques, adaptive feeding, and strategies for managing swallowing difficulties. 

3. Caregivers are supported through multidisciplinary teamwork, where psychologists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech therapists, nurses, and social workers offer counselling, emotional support, practical problem‑solving, and tailored care plans. Social workers help families cope with stress, maintain social inclusion, and access community resources and legal protections. Nurses provide home‑care guidance, respite strategies, and caregiver health assessments. 

4. The plan ensures ongoing follow‑up and monitoring, requiring health workers to track caregiver wellbeing and provide periodic training, home visits, and crisis support. This includes addressing caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, and burnout—acknowledged as critical risks influencing care quality. 

5. The plan integrates caregivers into decision‑making and encourages their participation in rehabilitation programs, support groups, and education sessions, ensuring they are not isolated in their responsibilities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The national dementia plan was developed through a multi‑stage, collaborative process. A Strategic Council, two technical committees, and experts from health, rehabilitation, and social sectors guided its creation. First, a draft was prepared based on existing system structures and international guidance. This draft was circulated to academics, specialists, and relevant organizations for review. Feedback was gathered through group discussions, revised, and integrated into a second and third draft. After multiple expert consultations and revisions, the final version was approved and disseminated to health authorities for implementation.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Health
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2016
What was implemented?

The Türkiye Elderly Profile Survey was implemented Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat), the General Directorate of Services for Persons with Disabilities, the Elderly of the Ministry of Family and Social Services on May 10, 2023. The survey compiled information on 29,785 people aged 50 and over, drawn from 22,640 sample households containing at least one member aged 50+, over 12 statistical regions.  This comprehensive survey covered demographic information, working life and economic status, health, independent living, care and social assistance, environment, participation in social life, life satisfaction, disasters and emergencies, and elderly rights and discrimination. For respondents unable to answer due to health problems or disability, proxy information was collected from a knowledgeable household or non-household member.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Users of data on older persons: Government, NGOs, public and private organizations. 

What were the results?

The survey produced detailed and sex-disaggregated data for welfare indicators for women and men aged 65 or over. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The survey was developed jointly by TurkStat, the General Directorate of Services for Persons with Disabilities, the Elderly of the Ministry of Family and Social Services, formalized through a signed protocol in May 2023. Implementation involved identifying sample households via regional sampling, then administering a multi-domain questionnaire in person to household members aged 50+. A proxy-response protocol was built in for older respondents with health conditions or disabilities restricting their ability to answer, using a knowledgeable substitute respondent while excluding subjective/opinion questions in those cases to preserve data validity.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This is a good practice because it takes holisitc, yet highliy detailed apporach towards  various indicators, ranging from health, functional capacity, technology use to social participation and end-of-life preferences.  The inter-institutional protocol between the statistics office and the social services , plus the planned, make the approach both replicable (a template other countries or regions could adopt) and sustainable, since open microdata access allows ongoing, independent policy research well beyond the initial press release.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat), the General Directorate of Services for Persons with Disabilities, the Elderly of the Ministry of Family and Social Services
Categories:
Data and research (Survey)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The SLP provides seniors with a pathway to financial independence. There are two distance tracks, each tailored to a seniors physical capability and interests: The Micro-enterprise Development (MD) Track and the Employment Facilitation (EF) Track. On MD Track, seniors are supported as individuals to start small businesses, or they are organized into associations. They are given a grant of up to P15,000 to start, and this is an interest-free grant and not a loan. The programme specifically funds 'Senior-Friendly' ventures such as garment sewing, organic urban gardening, and rice retailing. The EF track is for younger active seniors. They can receive vocational training in technical areas, and get connected to employers in the service and retail sectors.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Eligible Filipino Citizens

What were the results?

In 2025, the programme reached 235,000 vulnerable Filipinos, and served over 1000 senior citizens. The results show that individuals involved have improved standards of living, as they have additional household income and stabilized employment. The psychological impact of the programme remains positive, as it has combatted social isolation and given elders a renewed sense of purpose through productive activities.

How was it developed and implemented?

Since its start in 1993, the programme has evolved from a traditional credit facility into a more modern, grant-based sustainability model utilized today, and the shift was made in 2015. Seniors are identified, and given basic business training, then the grant is released and the micro-enterprise is set up. The DWSD helps the senior to link up with local markets and partners and the business is then monitored for growth. The final stage is where the senior 'graduates' from the programme after achieving a self-sustaining income.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This is a good practice as it is age inclusive, acknowledging that elders have valuable skills that are underutilized in that typical labour market, treating them as active economic contributors rather than passive dependents. Additionally, the programme has high visibility and support among non-beneficiaries, which creates an environment that encourages entrepreneurship in elders. The programme provides a safe and risk-free entry into entrepreneurship and provides a 5 year safety net to ensure long-term success for Filipinos in need.

Supporting documents:

https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/philippines/publication/the-philippines-sustainable-livelihood-program-providing-and-expanding-access-to-employment-and-livelihood-opportunities

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DWSD)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1993
What was implemented?

Tech-based Startup Centers for Seniors in the Republic of Korea constitute a government-supported initiative designed to promote entrepreneurship among older persons, typically aged 40 years and above, by providing integrated and age-sensitive business development support. Implemented nationwide through a network of centres, the programme identifies and recruits prospective senior entrepreneurs—often including retirees with substantial professional experience—and offers tailored entrepreneurship training, mentoring, and networking opportunities. It further provides access to shared workspaces and incubation services, supporting all stages of the startup lifecycle from idea development to commercialization. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Women and men aged 40 years old or over

What were the results?

Evidence suggests a growing number of technology-based startups led by individuals aged 40 and above, with their share increasing more rapidly than that of younger cohorts, indicating rising entrepreneurial activity among older persons. In parallel, there has been a notable increase in investment in senior-focused startups and “silver economy” ventures

How was it developed and implemented?

The Tech-based Startup Centers for Seniors in the Republic of Korea were developed incrementally within the country’s broader national entrepreneurship and ageing policy framework.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

By leveraging the skills, knowledge and networks of older persons, the initiative facilitates their transition into self-employment, thereby contributing to active ageing, income security and inclusive economic growth. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS) ; Korea Institute of Startup & Entrepreneurship Development (KISED)
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2010
What was implemented?

Techie Senior Citizens and Retirees Philippines (Techie Seniors PH) is a non-profit advocacy initiative that empowers older persons to live productive lives through digital literacy training and psychological wellness programs. The initiative provides online and in-person learning opportunities, entrepreneurial workshops, community meet-and-greet sessions, quizzes and specialized training for institutions. Techie Seniors PH helps older persons develop digital skills, create economic opportunities, stay socially connected and prepare for a stable retirement. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in the Philippines interested in learning digital skills

What were the results?

The initiative built a community of older adults interested in digital learning and active ageing and helped them gain digital skills with ongoing support mechanisms, including online learning communities. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Techie Senior Citizens and Retirees Philippines (Techie Seniors PH) was formed in February 2018 after Koree S. Monteloyola, founder of Kairos I.T. Services, organized a free seminar on internet usage for senior citizens and retirees as part of the company's anniversary activities. The positive response from older participants demonstrated a need for digital literacy support among older Filipinos and led to the establishment of a dedicated community.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The initiative addresses digital exclusion among older persons. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Techie Senior Citizens and Retirees Philippines (Techie Seniors PH)
Categories:
Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Older persons’ associations)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The Peng On Tung Tele-Assistance Service is a 24-hour emergency support and telecare service for older persons living alone, older couples and other people in need. Users can activate an emergency call through a simple alert device to receive immediate assistance. Since 2018, the service has also introduced an outdoor assistance function with real-time location tracking and search support, extending protection beyond the home. In addition to emergency response, the service provides information, referrals and access to home care, rehabilitation transport, home safety assessment and other community support services.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons living alone, elderly couples, persons with chronic illnesses, persons with dementia and other individuals requiring emergency community support.

What were the results?

The programme has developed into a territory-wide tele-assistance network supporting thousands of older persons. It provides continuous emergency response, community referrals and outdoor protection services. Recent government measures have expanded the service by waiving monthly service fees for eligible elderly persons living alone or in elderly-only households, improving affordability and access for vulnerable groups.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme was established through collaboration between the Social Welfare Bureau and the General Union of Neighbourhood Associations of Macau to support ageing in place. A 24-hour call centre responds to emergency alerts and coordinates assistance through community networks and relevant service providers. The service has progressively expanded from home-based emergency response to include outdoor positioning, search assistance and referrals to community care services. Government funding, community partnerships and telecommunications support have enabled continuous service improvement and wider coverage for vulnerable older persons.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The programme integrates emergency response, telecare, community support and digital technology into a single service that helps older persons remain safely in their own homes and communities. Its partnership model involving government, non-governmental organizations and the telecommunications sector demonstrates a scalable and sustainable approach to supporting ageing in place that can be adapted by other ageing societies.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Social Welfare Bureau (IAS) of the Macao SAR Government, in partnership with the General Union of Neighbourhood Associations of Macau (UGAMM)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Macao, China
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2009
What was implemented?

Telehealth communications and monitoring, implemented by Australian national and local governments, provides patients with consultations through video or telephone instead of face-to-face. This initiative can be used in three ways: remote patient monitoring, store-and-forward and consultations. Between the 13th of March and 31st of July 2022, 118.2 million telehealth services were delivered to 18 million patients.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All Medicare‑eligible Australians—including those in rural, remote, regional areas, and the broader population—benefited. Access expanded to GPs, specialists, allied health professionals, nurse practitioners, midwives, and more.

What were the results?

The programme enabled 16.1 million patients to access over 86.3 million telehealth services, delivered by more than 89,000 providers, with total Medicare rebates of $4.4 billion.

How was it developed and implemented?

Between March and May 2020, in response to COVID‑19, the government rapidly introduced 281 new MBS telehealth items; later, these were extended and formalized into permanent services following audit, stakeholder consultation, and phased policy integration.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It transformed 10 years of healthcare reform into just 10 days, dramatically improving nationwide access to care via telehealth, and enduring through permanence due to its proven scale, equity, and effectiveness.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2022

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.