Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The Law on State Pensions of the Republic of Armenia governs the management and financing of state pension security, outlines the types of state pensions, as well as conditions and procedures for calculation and payment. It establishes principles such as providing pension entitlement irrespective of nationality, race, gender, language, religion, political views or social origin.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Armenia eligible to pensions, regardless of nationality

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides non-discriminatory access to pensions. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Armenia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2010
What was implemented?

The Law on the Elderly, adopted by the Parliament of Mongolia, aims to regulate the factors that determine the type and extent of social security services each senior citizen would receive, and to define the rights and duties of state and business entities and of organizations regarding these services. The new law ensures that older persons will recieve the following services: information and communication services, counseling services, mobile services, medical services during office hours, voluntary services, day care and nursing services and residential care services.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Mongolia, especially those with care needs, disabilities, or limited family support.

What were the results?

As of early 2020, residential care covered only 1.6% of older persons in need, and long-term care in Mongolia remained mostly informal, relying on untrained family caregivers. Most existing services were medically driven, with limited access to social and psychosocial support, and a lack of coordinated, cross-sectoral systems.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Law on the Elderly was developed through stakeholder consultations led by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection, with support from international agencies like ADB. It was implemented via legal enactment, training programmes for caregivers, and the establishment of community-based service centres.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It adopts a holistic, rights-based approach to ageing, integrates health and social services, and promotes community involvement, aligning with international best practices in long-term care.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Parliament of Mongolia
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Mongolia
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Long-term Care Insurance Act, implemented by the Japanese Government and Ministry of Justice, aims to ensure the care of the elderly and to facilitate their daily life according to their special needs. For the Act, insurers shall be municipalities and special wards in themetropolital area, with the central government, prefctures, health care insurers and pension insurers providing continous support and assistance to them.

Who were the beneficiaries?

People aged 65 and older needing long‑term care, and those aged 40–64 with age‑related diseases, were eligible—regardless of income or family caregiving availability.

What were the results?

The programme supports over 5 million seniors aged 65+, about 17% of that age group, facilitating home‑ and facility‑based care while easing family burdens. Service use increased markedly, with formal services boosting support and reducing caregiver time (especially among higher‑income groups). Moreover, LTCI helped lower annual medical expenses for elderly people compared to pre‑implementation levels.

How was it developed and implemented?

The law passed in 1997, followed by a three‑year pilot, culminating in a mandatory social insurance system launched April 2000. Funded equally by taxes (central, prefectural, municipal) and insurance premiums from citizens aged 40+, municipalities act as insurers; beneficiaries pay only 10% copayment (adjusted to 20–30% for higher‑income groups later).

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It modernized elderly care by socializing caregiving, ensuring universal, equitable access, relieving family burden, and establishing evidence-based, sustainable financing structures.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Japan, Ministry of Justice
Categories:
Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
Enacted in 1997 and fully implemented in April 2000
What was implemented?

This is a practice was established under the Protection of the Rights of Elders Act No. 9 of 2000. The maintenance Board allows seniors to file claims against children who have neglected them. Taking a mediation approach, it acts as a community court, allowing for justice without the intimidation of going through the legal system. Seniors can fight for financial support or care from their adult children.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons of Sri Lanka, especially those at risk of neglect

What were the results?

A board meets frequently, around 50 times a year, and successfully resolve a significant number of cases. They close around 50% of cases through mediation.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme follows a restorative justice model rather than waiting for a lawsuit. An elder can apply for a maintenance order against their children, a conciliation officer then meets with both parties to reach an agreement. If conciliation fails, the board holds a formal hearing. They then have the power to issue a legally binding Maintenance Order that requires children to pay a monthly allowance, which covers specific care such as food, shelter or clothing.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme ensures that ageing in place is financially possible for seniors without an independent income but who have children that can support them.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The National Secretariat for Elders
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Sri Lanka
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2000
What was implemented?

The 2024 Forum focused on “A Sustainable Pension System”, addressing challenges posed by an aging population, declining working-age population, and the sustainability of government funded defined benefit pension schemes. Discussions emphasized the life-cycle perspective on intergenerational resource flows, exploring how changing demographics affect pension sustainability, and policy measures to ensure adequate retirement income while maintaining fiscal balance.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers and government officials involved in retirement and social protection, public 

What were the results?

The Forum aimed to raise awareness, foster multi-stakeholder dialogue, and promote collaboration to secure the financial well-being of the country’s aging population, while emphasizing the need for balanced intergenerational resource sharing to ensure a sustainable and resilient pension system.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed in collaboration with Ministry of Social and Family Development, Ministry of Finance, Maldives Bureau of Statistics, UNFPA

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Developed in collaboration with Ministry of Social and Family Development, Ministry of Finance, Maldives Bureau of Statistics, UNFPA

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Partners included the Ministry of Social and Family Development, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, Auditor General's Office, Maldives Bureau of Statistics, UNFPA, BML, Dhiraagu, MCB and CBM
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection
Country:
Maldives
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
N/A
What was implemented?

The Moscow Longevity Project, implemented by the Mayor of Moscow, is the largest health, education and leisure project for older persons in Moscow. The initiative offers Muscovites the opportunity to participate in over 30 different activities, including classes aimed at improving physical and cognitive health, with online courses and video chats available for those who prefer to participate from home.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Beneficiaries are retirees in Moscow—women aged 55+, men aged 60+—regardless of employment status, focusing on enhancing their social inclusion, health, and active lifestyle opportunities.

What were the results?

As of 2025, the programme engaged over 660,000 older Muscovites in more than 141 Moscow Longevity Centres and many more self-organized clubs. It offers free cultural, educational, physical and recreational activities through a network of institutional and NGO partners. Participants have reported improved well‑being, social ties, and purposeful engagement.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Moscow Longevity programme was formally launched as a pilot on 1 March 2018 and scaled citywide in January 2019 through a mayoral decree. It involved city agencies, NGOs, and social service centers under an integrated governance framework.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The Moscow Longevity Project is conceptualized as a systemic social intervention that addresses multiple dimensions of ageing, such as health, education, social inclusion, self-organization, and intergenerational cohesions - allowing for cumulative, reinforcing positive impacts. It transforms urban ageing through community-based, inclusive programming that promotes physical, cognitive, and social engagement using free, accessible services—fostering dignity and active citizenship in older age. The project explicitly contributes to changing public attitudes toward older age by reinforcing the value of active, capable, and socially engaged older people, which strengthens social cohesion across the city. Research (e.g. VTSIOM, 2025) on the social impacts of the Moscow Longevity Project shows improved quality of life, contribution to healthy life expectancy, increased self-realization and social participation, higher levels of financial, legal, and digital literacy, and the formation of a supportive communication environment for older citizens. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
mos.ru - Moscow Mayor and Moscow Government
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

The Positive Ageing Strategy, implemented by the Government of New Zealand and Minsitry of Social Development, articulates the Governments commitment to positive ageing. The strategy aims to promote a society where people can age positiviely, where people value older persons and where older persons are recognised as an integral part of families and communities. The strategy provides a common platform for which central and local government agencies and communities can develop strategies and initiatives for positive ageing - spanning the spectrum of health, financial security, independence, self-fulfilment, personal safety and living environments.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older people across New Zealand—especially in rural communities, Māori, Pacific, and culturally diverse populations—benefited from improved income security, health services, housing, transport, community safety, and opportunities for participation.

What were the results?

The Strategy fostered cross-sector integration, prompting agencies to embed positive ageing goals into policies and annual action plans, and enabled the abolition of compulsory retirement—resulting in 22% of those aged 65+ remaining in paid work in 2014, contributing economically and socially.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed through extensive public, sector, and community consultations led by the Advisory Council for Senior Citizens, it set out ten aspirational goals and annual action plans across government agencies to ensure monitoring, accountability, and implementation.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It integrates a comprehensive, consultative framework across multiple sectors, ensuring sustained, inclusive, and rights-based ageing policy implementation.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of New Zealand, Ministry of Social Development
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2014
What was implemented?

The Older Persons Health Technology Innovation Building is a hub that aims to develop proactive health service models that enhance older persons ability to live quality lives independently. The services begin with a 9-point health screening, and if any risks are identified, further assessments are conducted. The institute also offers holistic health and wellness services such as wellness gym, daycare for elderly, hydrotherapy and physical and occupational therapy.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Those aged 50+ (pre-elderly)

What were the results?

Since opening in 2024, the building has now become a fully functioning service hub. Data collected from the hubs assessments is being used to shape the National Action Plan on Older Persons (Phase 3 2023-2037).

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This project bridges the gap between medical research, elderly care and technology. It promotes active-ageing and independence in elderly citizens.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Somdet Phra Sangharaja Tanasangwon Institute of Geriatric Medicine
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

The Orange Card is a national ID card that grants seniors over the age of 65 access to all public services. This include hospitals, banks, and transportation services.  They can get discounts on airline tickets, and have their own Fastlane lines at most public services.  Additionally, seniors may have access to priority seating in public spaces and discounts where possible.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Citizens of Bhutan aged 65 years or over

What were the results?

Many banks, such as Bank of Bhutan, have dedicated Senior Citizen Priority Counters at all branches. There has been reported satisfaction of no longer having to wait in long queues. In healthcare facilities, there is Priority Signage for those with disabilities and elderly ages 65+. This fast track system reduced waiting room times, and as such encouraged seniors to seek medical help more frequently. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The senior citizen cards were developed as a result of many years of evidence-based research conducted by the Royal Society for Senior Citizens and the Ministry of Health. They identified that wait time and physical access were barriers to the wellbeing of older citizens in Bhutan.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Views seniors as a priority rather than a burden on the healthcare system, and respects the challenges they may face in many situations. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Implementing/responsible entity:
Royal Society for Senior Citizens, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Home Affairs
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Bhutan
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Protection of the Rights of Elders (Amendment) Act, No 5, implemented by the Parliament of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, revised the original legislation to enhance the protection and welfare of older persons in Sri Lanka. Key provisions included the issuance of identity cards for older persons to access public and private sector benefits, the appointment of conciliation officers, the promotion of gerontology knowledge among caregivers and the introduction of updated registration ad monitoring procedures for residential care facilities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All elderly Sri Lankans, as the amendment strengthened protection for their rights, welfare, and dignity.

What were the results?

Post-amendment, the Act established the National Council for Elders, supported a dedicated Secretariat for implementation, and enabled local-level elders’ committees to execute welfare programs. This institutional framework has facilitated elders’ participation in decision-making and better access to services.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed through legislative amendment, the government revised sections of the original Act to strengthen oversight. The Council and Secretariat were empowered to roll out programs via local divisional and village elders’ committees, bringing services closer to communities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It created a formal governance structure for elder welfare—integrating national oversight with local implementation—and fostered elders’ representation and improved access to tailored services.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Parliament of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Sri Lanka
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2011

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.