Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 Tutorial

Watch a video how to use the database https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SaMdlFSkD0

Total: 392 good practice(s). Download

What was implemented?

The “While you were small, we grow” project in Izmir, Türkiye, was implemented by a doctoral student from the Department of Internal Medicine Elderly Health. This initiative brought together older persons and high school students to teach each other traditional and modern games, correspondingly breaking down generational barriers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

older adults (aged 60+) enrolled in the University of the Third Age (Tazelenme Üniversitesi) at Ege University, and high school students from several technical high schools in İzmir.

What were the results?

In nine months, the programme more than doubled in scale, fostering intergenerational connection and cultural exchange through monthly high school game sessions.

How was it developed and implemented?

The project was conceptualized by PhD candidate Buğçe Kamer Baybaş from the Department of Internal Medicine’s Gerontology group at Ege University. Inspired by intergenerational values and the Turkish National Ageing Action Plan (2007), she collaborated with teacher Ülker Orhan to bring the idea to life. Initially piloted with a small intergenerational group, the project quickly scaled when Baybaş encountered the Ortak Değerler Hareketi (Shared Values Movement) and received support through its support program. Participants were then selected from multiple schools and Tazelenme University, and they met monthly across different high school venues over a nine-month period.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The project used play as a universal bridge to connect older and younger generations, fostering mutual respect, empathy, and cultural exchange. Elders shared traditional folk games while youth introduced contemporary ones, creating a holistic value exchange that evolved from a 3-month pilot into a 9-month programme with a public festival. Rooted in community and backed by institutions like Ege University and Ortak Değerler Hareketi, the scalable model broke down age stereotypes, gained public recognition, and demonstrated potential for replication in other communities.

View More
Who implemented it?
Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ege University
Categories:
Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

A WHO Collaborating Centre on geriatrics and care for older people was set up at the Russian Clinical and Research Centre of Gerontology of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (supported by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation) to promote integrated primary and long‑term care, design and test innovative care models, support training, and advocate for/evaluate healthy‑ageing policies. The Centre's mission aligns with the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing and aims to strengthen evidence‑based approaches and scale models for ageing populations.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primary beneficiaries are older people in the Russian Federation and neighbouring countries through better integrated care and long‑term care. Secondary beneficiaries include health and social‑care professionals who receive training and guidance, and policymakers who gain evidence‑informed analyses and recommendations to adapt systems to demographic change.

What were the results?

Early outcomes are system‑level: the Centre is mandated to exchange and disseminate information on geriatric services and long‑term care, assess country progress and barriers, prepare policy reviews, and develop educational programmes for health and social‑care workers. At national level, the Ministry highlights an existing three‑tier geriatric infrastructure (regional centres, outpatient offices, beds) that provides the operational base for Centre‑supported improvements.

How was it developed and implemented?

Designation followed multi‑year groundwork at RCRCG: research on ageing, creation of a biobank of long‑livers, development of clinical and organizational solutions, and an education pipeline for specialists. WHO/Europe’s designation formalized this role and positioned the centre within the WHO CC network to share data, co‑develop policies, and train practitioners across the Russian Federation and the wider region.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It couples a national centre of excellence (RCRCG) with WHO’s collaborating‑centre framework, ensuring replicability, policy relevance, and regional reach. The model integrates research, clinical practice, training, and policy support, directly addressing rapid population ageing and aligning with global healthy‑ageing agendas. Clear terms of reference (innovation in care models, training, policy evaluation) and an established national geriatrics infrastructure increase feasibility and potential impact.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
WHO Collaborating Centre operates at the Russian Clinical and Research Centre of Gerontology (RCRCG), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University.
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Age-inclusive health care, Long-term care)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

Japan has established a statutory system for monitoring and implementing ageing policies through the Basic Act on Measures for an Ageing Society. Under Article 8 of the Act, the Government must submit an annual report to the National Diet on the state of the ageing society and the implementation of ageing-related measures, and present plans for future actions. The Cabinet Office coordinates this process across ministries and agencies. Monitoring combines administrative data, surveys, policy reviews and annual reporting. Older persons also participate in policy review processes, including through advisory bodies convened during revisions of national ageing policy guidelines.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers at national and local level benefit from evidence and data to use for policy design. 

What were the results?

The framework has institutionalized regular monitoring of ageing policies across government for nearly three decades. Annual reports provide information on demographic trends, policy implementation and future measures, covering fields such as employment, pensions, health, long-term care, social participation and living environments. The system also supports evidence-based policy adjustments. In employment policy, annual employer reporting under the Act on Stabilization of Employment of Elderly Persons enables the Government to monitor workforce participation and implementation of measures supporting longer working lives for older persons.

How was it developed and implemented?

The monitoring framework was established through the Basic Act on Measures for an Ageing Society in 1995. The Act created a legal obligation for government-wide monitoring and annual reporting to the National Diet. Over time, the framework has been strengthened through the Guideline of Measures for Ageing Society and periodic policy reviews. According to the MIPAA survey, when the guidelines were revised, the Cabinet Office established a Study Group on Basic Measures for Ageing Society that included scholars and older persons. Monitoring also incorporates employer reports, surveys and research undertaken by government and independent agencies. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice provides a legal and institutional mechanism for ensuring accountability, continuity and evidence-based policymaking on ageing. Annual reporting requirements ensure that ageing issues remain visible in national policy processes and that implementation is reviewed regularly. The framework combines monitoring, forward planning and stakeholder participation, including the involvement of older persons in policy review processes. Because it is mandated by legislation and coordinated across government sectors, the system supports a coherent response to population ageing and helps align policy implementation with changing demographic trends.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Cabinet Office of Japan with other national ministries and agencies
Categories:
Implementation and follow-up
Country:
Japan
Type of instrument:
Policy
Year of implementation:
1995
What was implemented?

The Work Bonus, implemented by the Department of Social Services, is an Australian initiative that aims to support and reward older persons over ’AgePension’ age. This bonus was implemented to incentivise older persons to continue to work as it allows them to keep more of their pension, whilst earning income fron work, allowing them to earn up to $300 every two weeks.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The programme benefits Age Pensioners and eligible seniors, particularly those who are still working. It allows them to earn income from employment or self-employment without reducing their pension entitlement.

What were the results?

The scheme substantially improved income retention for older Australians by excluding a portion of their work income from the pension income test and allowing accumulation of unused credits. As of 2023, the Work Bonus balance cap increased to $11,800—allowing seniors to earn more without impact to their pension, thereby enhancing financial autonomy and workforce inclusion.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Work Bonus was developed by the Department of Social Services to support workforce participation among older Australians. It is administered by Services Australia, with automatic income concessions applied through pension assessments.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides a clear, flexible financial incentive that aligns work and pension policy—empowering older individuals to stay engaged in the workforce without financial penalty, while minimizing administrative complexity.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Social Services
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment)
Country:
Australia
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2009
What was implemented?

The ’Working in Aged Care’ in New Zealand, implemented by the Government, Ministry of Business and Innovation and Employment, is a guidebook to help individuals who want to work in the aged sector as support workers, caregivers or health care professionals. The guide helps individuals understand the sector and where to find advice and support if needed.

Who were the beneficiaries?

New migrant aged‑care workers—especially from the Philippines, Pacific nations (Tonga, Samoa, Fiji, Kiribati, Tuvalu), India, and China—as well as their employers in New Zealand’s aged care sector.

What were the results?

New migrant aged‑care workers—especially from the Philippines, Pacific nations (Tonga, Samoa, Fiji, Kiribati, Tuvalu), India, and China—as well as their employers in New Zealand’s aged care sector.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Settlement Unit, MBIE, and sector stakeholders co-developed the guides, which were disseminated through Settlement Information, local communications, and included with visa application materials to reach both migrants and employers effectively.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It proactively addresses both migrant and employer needs with clear, practical guidance—fostering smoother integration, workplace harmony, and improved service delivery.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of New Zealand, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers)
Country:
New Zealand
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2014
What was implemented?

Xiaomi introduced age-friendly accessibility features for its smart TVs to improve digital accessibility for older persons. The initiative includes a Senior Mode with simplified navigation, larger fonts and icons, enhanced voice control, and content tailored to older users. The interface was designed with reference to accessibility principles to reduce barriers to the use of smart devices and support older persons' participation in the digital society.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons, particularly older adults with limited digital literacy or age-related visual and functional impairments.

What were the results?

The initiative improved the accessibility and usability of smart TVs for older users by providing simplified interfaces and voice-enabled interaction. It also supported the national effort to promote age-friendly digital products and services.

How was it developed and implemented?

The initiative was developed in response to China's increasing digitalization and population ageing.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The initiative demonstrates how private-sector innovation can support digital inclusion through accessible product design. Its approach can be readily replicated by other technology companies seeking to improve the accessibility of digital devices for older persons and contribute to age-friendly digital environments.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Xiaomi Corporation
Categories:
Older persons and development (Digital inclusion)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The Young Happy initiative is a social platform dedicated to improving the quality of life for older adults by fostering happiness, independence, and active engagement. It offers both online and offline activities, educational programs, and opportunities for volunteering and social interaction, aiming to transform aging into a positive and empowering experience. Through partnerships and community-building, Young Happy promotes lifelong learning, meaningful connections, and a sense of purpose for seniors, helping them stay active and valued in society.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Thailand and their families who participate in the initiative

What were the results?

Over 50,000 members actively participate in YoungHappy initiatives which led to increasing their digital literacy and social connections. 

How was it developed and implemented?

YoungHappy was founded when its CEO and co‑founder, Charkhris “Gap” Phomyoth, witnessed firsthand the loneliness and lack of purpose experienced by his own retired parents. Recognizing that retirement often led to depression, social isolation, and missed opportunities for lifelong learning, he was inspired to combine his personal motivation with the principles of social business to build a platform that empowers seniors. They launched YoungHappy in 2017–2018 in Bangkok as a hybrid online and offline community—offering activities, tech training, peer engagement, and volunteer opportunities—to help older adults stay active, valued, technologically connected, and socially engaged.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The project supports human-centered innovation. It directly increases older persons digital literacy, promotes intergenerational support and empowers older persons to stay active. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Young Happy, Social enterprise
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Combatting ageism); Older persons and development (Digital inclusion, Participation of older persons)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2018
What was implemented?

Although the country lacks a formal pension system for older persons, youSave has emerged as a practical and scalable solution that helps older adults—especially those in the informal economy—prepare financially for old age. In a country with a large informal sector, the youSave program was specifically created to help self‑employed and informal workers open retirement savings accounts.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Informal sector workers in Solomon Islands

What were the results?

The youSave program enabled self‑employed and informal‑sector workers—including many older adults—to open voluntary retirement savings accounts for the first time.

How was it developed and implemented?

youSave was developed as part of a broader government strategy to expand access to financial services, especially in remote areas where older persons struggle to reach banks. The National Financial Inclusion Strategy supported the programme. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

In the absence of a comprehensive pension scheme it allows access to basic income security to those in the informal sector and promotes financial inclusion. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Central Bank of Solomon Islands with National Provident Fund
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Solomon Islands
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2017
What was implemented?

The Life Apartments are an elderly-oriented, comprehensive community that adopted the concept of Life Apartments from the Netherlands for healthy and comfortable aging. The complex offers medical services, such as nursing and rehabilitation, as well as social spaces, like restaurants and daily activity programs. Visitors from outside are welcome to promote open spaces where people of all ages can interact.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older adults, particularly retired seniors, who need a supportive living environment.

What were the results?

The most recent data shows that 11 life apartments have been built nationwide in China, serving over 5,000 senior residents. Residents of these apartments reported increased satisfaction and greater involvement in social activities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Jiangsu Yunlin Elderly Care Group built the Life Apartment project based on the "happy retired life" philosophy of Dutch life apartment projects. The apartments are equipped with smart technology. These include smart sensors and emergency alarms, as well as an online platform where senior residents can easily access community activities and earn points on their "time banks" that can be exchanged for other services.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The living concept integrates into society by providing spaces for different generations and giving older adults easier access to medical services and social activities. It also sets a positive example for adapting projects from different cultural backgrounds to local contexts.

View More
Who implemented it?
Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Jiangsu Yunlin Elderly Care Group
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
China
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2016
What was implemented?

EVSAD developed and launched an online training platform entitled “Hastam Emin Ellerde” (My Patient Is in Safe Hands). The initiative provides educational videos and guidance for individuals caring for patients at home. According to the association, the programme aims to help caregivers provide home care using appropriate and effective methods in situations where caring for a patient at home is required.

Who were the beneficiaries?
  • Family members and informal caregivers providing care at home.
  • Individuals responsible for supporting patients requiring home-based care.
  • Potentially older persons and other care recipients who benefit from improved quality of home care.
How was it developed and implemented?

The initiative was developed by EVSAD as part of its mission to support health and social services in home settings. The programme uses an online learning platform through which caregivers can access educational content and training videos focused on home-care practices. The association presents the programme as a resource to strengthen caregivers’ ability to provide effective home-based care.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?
  • Supports capacity-building for home-based caregivers through accessible online learning resources. 
  • Promotes care provision in home settings, which can support ageing in place and community-based care. 
  • Uses digital technology to expand access to caregiving knowledge and practical guidance
View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Turkish Home Health and Social Services Association (EVSAD)
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Ageing in place/housing, Support to caregivers)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2025

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members including for the Fourth Asia-Pacific Review and Appraisal of MIPAA, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.