Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 319 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

The Reverse Mortgage programme offered by Thailand’s Government Housing Bank (GHB) is a financial initiative designed to support income security for older persons by allowing them to convert housing assets into regular cash flow.

Under this scheme, Thai homeowners aged 60–80 can use their fully owned, debt-free property as collateral to access a loan, which the bank pays out in monthly instalments to cover daily living expenses. Unlike conventional loans, repayment is typically deferred, and beneficiaries are not required to demonstrate a minimum income, making the programme accessible to retirees. 

The initiative provides flexible loan terms (6 months to 25 years) and up to 10 million baht per borrower, helping older persons maintain financial independence while continuing to live in their homes.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older Thai home owners between 60 and 80 years of age

What were the results?

According to studies, the use of the reverse mortgage scheme is still low, mainly because of lack of awareness and many older persons want to leave their home as inheritance. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The initiative began in mid‑2019, as part of Thailand’s policy response to population ageing and the need for new financial tools to support older persons’ income security.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The reverse mortgage initiative by Thailand’s Government Housing Bank is a promising but still emerging good practice. It addresses income insecurity among older persons by enabling them to convert housing assets into monthly payments while ageing in place, promoting financial independence and dignity. However, its impact remains limited due to very low uptake. While the programme demonstrates strong innovation and policy relevance in an ageing society, further outreach, design improvements and supportive measures are needed to scale up use and achieve meaningful impact on older persons’ wellbeing.

Supporting documents:

@RM-Final-Report.pdf

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Private sector
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government Housing Bank
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Thailand
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

The Constitution of Timor-Leste specifically guarantees the right to social protection by the State to all older citizens of Timor-Leste. Policies have to provide older persons with "opportunities for personal achievement" (Article 20). Further, Article 56 guarantees the right to social protection; Article 56 guarantees the right to health. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

All citizens of Timor-Leste who are guaranteed constitutional rights

What were the results?

The old-age allowance is based on the constitutional right to social protection in the constitution of Timor-Leste.

Decree on living allowances for the elderly and persons with disabilities

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It takes a rights-based approach. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Timor-Leste
Categories:
Older persons and development (Rights of older persons)
Country:
Timor-Leste
Type of instrument:
Law or act
Year of implementation:
2002
What was implemented?

A programme aimed at enhancing transport infrastructure accessibility for individuals with limited mobility, including older adults. Key measures included adapting transport facilities, services, and infrastructure to make them accessible for people with disabilities and other groups with limited mobility, including older persons. This included public transportation vehicles, railway stations, and social infrastructure, as well as legal reforms.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Individuals with limited mobility, including older adults. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The roadmap was developed as part of Kazakhstan's alignment with the National Plan for the Rights and Quality of Life of People with Disabilities. Implementation followed a phased, data-driven approach, involving nationwide identification of relevant infrastructure objects,  gradual adaptation and compliance checks, annual monitoring cycles, use of digital tools an coordination between national ministries and local authorities. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This policy combines clear targets, systematic monitoring, and public accountability mechanisms. The use of an interactive map and feedback portal promotes transparency and citizen participation, while the scale of coverage (22,000 objects nationwide) ensures both urban and rural inclusion. Alignment with national disability rights frameworks and integration of legal reforms further strengthens sustainability and enforcement.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
The programme was led by the Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development, with support from the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection and local executive bodies.
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

Plan 4170/KH‑BVHTTDL sets out the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism’s roadmap for implementing Viet Nam’s National Strategy on Older Persons, with a focus on promoting active ageing, cultural participation, and social inclusion. The plan aims to harness the knowledge, experience, and contributions of older persons in culture, family life, sports, and tourism, while improving their material and spiritual well‑being, particularly for vulnerable groups such as older persons with disabilities, those living in poverty, ethnic minorities, and those without caregivers. Key measures include strengthening communication and awareness‑raising on ageing, supporting older persons’ participation in cultural and artistic activities, reading and heritage preservation, expanding age‑appropriate physical activity and sports, and promoting age‑friendly tourism. The plan also emphasizes preventing violence and abuse through community‑based models—such as Intergenerational Self‑Help Clubs, family happiness clubs, and trusted community support points—and reinforcing the role of older persons in transmitting family values and cultural traditions. Implementation is assigned across MCST departments with requirements for coordination, efficiency, regular monitoring, and adaptation to local contexts, reinforcing the shift from a welfare‑based to an active‑ageing and development‑oriented approach to population ageing in Viet Nam.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The beneficiaries are older persons in Viet Nam. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Plan 4170/KH‑BVHTTDL (2025) was developed as an implementation plan following the formal adoption of Viet Nam’s National Strategy on Older Persons to 2035, with a vision to 2045, which was approved by the Prime Minister under Decision No. 383/QĐ‑TTg on 21 February 2025. The plan translates the national‑level strategy into sector‑specific actions for the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MCST), in accordance with Viet Nam’s policy‑making and planning system. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The plan is a clear sectoral plan to implement the wider National Policy on Ageing. It also includes Intergenerational Self-Help Clubs, thus giving ownership to older persons and promoting intergenerational initiatives. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan); Older persons and development (Intergenerational initiatives, Older persons’ associations, Participation of older persons, Rights of older persons)
Country:
Viet Nam
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2025
What was implemented?

Older persons were both victims of as well as actors in emergency response during the 2022 floods in Pakistan. OPAs were instrumental in locating and supporting vulnerable older people in submerged areas of Sindh and Balochistan. With the support of OPAs, older persons received age-sensitive aid such as food, hygiene kits, cash, wheelchairs, and psychosocial support after the floods. In Khairpur, mobile teams distributed essential supplies and provided health screenings and rehabilitation devices to older individuals trapped by floodwaters. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons affected by disasters

What were the results?

Support to approximately 8,000 older people during floods

How was it developed and implemented?

Following the floods in 2010, HelpAge International began forming OPAs in rural communities. As OPAs had already been in place, they were able to provide support in 2022. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Use of grassroot organizations and making older persons actors and not only recipients of support. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Help Age Pakistan as well as Foundation for Ageing and Inclusive Development (FAID)
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters); Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations)
Country:
Pakistan
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2022
What was implemented?

The Safer Environment for Seniors Programme, implemented by the Singaporean Housing and Development Board, aims to incorporate universal design principles in public housing, namely ample seating, to make make them age- and user-friendly for older and disabled persons. This programme additionally involves intergenerational play spaces, namely three-generation fitness and play facilities, for families to enjoy together.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Primarily seniors (aged 60/65+) in HDB flats; EASE 2.0 expanded to include public rental housing (about 26,800 more seniors). Additionally, from 2026, eligible private property households with seniors (70,000+ households) will benefit under EASE (Private).

What were the results?

By April 2024, approximately 293,000 households had installed senior‑friendly fittings since 2012, improving mobility and safety within the flat.

How was it developed and implemented?

Built as part of the Home Improvement Programme (HIP) since 2012, featuring heavy government subsidy (up to 95%), resident opt‑in via HIP polling; EASE 2.0 added new fittings (foldable grab bars, lowered kerbs, bidet sprays, HFAD) from April 2024. Implementation combines flat‑level upgrades and precinct‑level enhancements like neighbourhood improvements and assisted‑living facilities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It integrates aging-friendly design into existing housing programmes with strong subsidy and resident participation, delivering tangible safety and mobility improvements for seniors while scaling across public and private housing.

Supporting documents:

The Safer Environment for Seniors Programme, implemented by the Singaporean Housing and Development Board, aims to incorporate universal design principles in public housing, namely ample seating, to make make them age- and user-friendly for older and disabled persons. This programme additionally involves intergenerational play spaces, namely three-generation fitness and play facilities, for families to enjoy together.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Housing and Development Board, Singapore
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Singapore
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2006
What was implemented?

Naju City found that 2 in 10 older persons in the Republic of Korea had experienced an injury from falling over. This can lead to injury-related deaths of elderly people and overall lower quality of life due to pain or disability. This initiative aims to combat this issue by implementing hand rails at the many different senior centers around the city. This initiative is a core component of the Age-Friendly Strategic Plan that began in 2019.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons at risk of falls

What were the results?

Over 1900 hand rails have been installed around Naju City, across 610 senior centers since 2020 when the initiative began.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as a result of the Survey of Living Conditions (2019), which found that 20% of Naju city's seniors had suffered a fall that led to injury. The city created this plan as a result of consultations with local senior citizens.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

Responds directly to an issue identified in the community and has a direcl positive impact on its citizens. This initiative increases accessibility to social spaces such as the senior centers, having a positive impact on their mental health and wellbeing.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Naju City Social Welfare Department, collaboration with WHO
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities)
Country:
Republic of Korea
Type of instrument:
Case study
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

The Sehat Sahulat Programme (SSP) is Pakistan’s flagship social health protection initiative, designed to provide free inpatient healthcare particularly to poor and vulnerable citizens, of them most are older persons, by using a national health insurance model. It represents one of the country’s largest steps toward Universal Health Coverage. It was begun as a pilot initiative covering a few districts. Initially, it strictly targeted vulnerable populations but is subsequently expanded towards universal coverage. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

Originally, poor and vulnerable populations with envisaged expansion to a universal scheme. 

What were the results?

The programme expanded access to health care. 

How was it developed and implemented?

It was initiated as a pilot project in some districts covering only vulnerable populations and subsequently expanded to other population groups and other areas of Pakistan. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Pakistan
Categories:
Health and well-being (Age-inclusive health care)
Country:
Pakistan
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2020
What was implemented?

Elderly schools in Indonesia that represent a shift from traditional care to lifelong learning, these are informal education institutions aiming to create SMART seniors. Sehat (healthy) Mandiri (independent) Aktif (active) Realis (Realistic/Productive) Tangguh (Resilient). It is a three tier educational system, where seniors graduate each level. Tier 1 focuses on basic health and self-care, tier 2 focuses on knowledge of nutrition, mental health and social roles, and tier 3 is the advanced level where seniors learn digital literacy, vocational skills and community leadership. Seniors participate in a graduation ceremony after 6 to 12 months of completing all three tiers of the course.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Indonesia

What were the results?

There were over 2000 Sekolah Lansia facilities across all 38 provinces. Seniors have a sense of empowerment and self-confidence after taking part in the courses. The digital literacy course in tier 3 created a space for the SatuSehat national app to be onboarded with seniors. Additionally, the schools served as a social space for elderly, combatting loneliness. Many elderly went on to become 'Elderly Ambassadors' in their own communities.

How was it developed and implemented?

Rather than building new schools, the government integrated these elderly schools into existing community groups (Bina Keluarga Lansia). 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme is highly replicable, with the ability to be implemented in both rural and urban areas. By holding a graduation ceremony, older persons are able to feel a sense of   accomplishment, pride and achievement for finishing the course. It combats the loneliness epidemic by creating a space that isn't home or the hospital, where elderly can socialize and learn.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National Population and Family Planning Board
Categories:
Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development (Participation of older persons); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Indonesia
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

Senior Citizen Activity Centre (Pusat Kegiatan Warga Emas) was established as a dedicated community centre for older persons, providing a place for them to interact, participate in meaningful activities, and remain socially engaged.

The Garis Panduan Pusat Kegiatan Warga Emas (PKWE) was implemented as a formal guideline to standardize the administration, financial management, programme delivery and operational procedures of all Senior Citizens Activity Centres in Brunei Darussalam. It functions as a framework to ensure PKWE centres operate systematically and effectively as community support hubs for older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Brunei Darussalam

What were the results?

The Activity Centre provided seniors with a place to interact with peers, engage in activities, and continue learning, while also acting as a focal point that supports community involvement and strengthens relationships across generations and improves their quality of life.

How was it developed and implemented?

PKWE was implemented through multisectoral collaboration involving government agencies, private sectors, non‑governmental organisations and local communities. It is administered by an Administrative Committee made up of registered members, responsible for management, activity planning and financial governance. The Centre operates every working day for at least six hours, offering programmes in religion, arts, ICT, health, social recreation and entrepreneurship. Annual allocations from the Community Development Department fund official activities, while other agencies may support programme delivery.

The corresponding guideline was developed by JAPEM under the Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports to support the growing number of PKWE centres across districts. It establishes criteria for centre formation, membership rules, committee structures, financial protocols, programme categories, health and safety standards and reporting systems. PKWE committees implement the guidelines daily, while JAPEM oversees compliance through monitoring, inspections and advisory roles.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The activity centre provides a holistic, inclusive and community‑centred approach to ageing. PKWE empowers older people to remain active contributors, supports healthy ageing, fosters meaningful participation, encourages lifelong learning and helps reduce ageism.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports and communities
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing); Older persons and development (Participation of older persons)
Country:
Brunei Darussalam
Type of instrument:
Service
Year of implementation:
2013

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.