Good practices repository

Database of good practices on ageing

Database

This database showcases good practices from countries and territories in Asia and the Pacific for implementing the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA). Select and filter by categories and sub-categories, country, type of instrument.

 

Total: 319 good practice(s).

What was implemented?

This is a non-contributory pension scheme, serving as a safety net for vulnerable older persons in the Philippines. It is strictly for citizens who are over 60 and who are frail or have a disability, and who have no income, support from relatives or pension from elsewhere. This pension specifically addresses the pension gap that is faced by Filipina women. They have often worked in the informal economy, and have no savings, necessary to receive other pensions. This is important as women generally live longer than men and often have less assets they represent a large number of the indigent seniors receiving this pension. As of 2024, the pension amount was doubled from PHP 500 to 1000.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Vulnerable older persons with no other source of income

What were the results?

Women who receive this pension make up approximately 60-70% of the total recipients. Through this pension, they have more autonomy over their money, fostering  a sense of independence. 4.11 million indigent persons nationwide receive this pension. 

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed as a response to the gap in coverage, where millions of Filipinos who were informal workers became elderly without any form of income security. Seniors may apply at the Office of the Senior Citizens Affair or the Municipal Social Welfare and Development Office in their local town.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This is a gender-responsive good practice focusing on protection of 'invisible' workers, those who were a part of the informal economy their whole lives. It also shifts the burden of care for older persons from family onto the government, recognizing that contributory pensions are not enough for a developing country such as the Philippines. This pension can also help break intergenerational cycles of poverty by ensuring grandparents are not a financial drain on the rest of the family. Funds can then be redirected to the younger members.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Department of Social Welfare and Development with local partners
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Philippines
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2011, expanded in 2024
What was implemented?

Fiji’s Social Pension Scheme (SPS) is a non-contributory monthly allowance for citizens aged 65 and over who do not receive any other pension or social welfare benefits. Administered by the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Protection through the Department of Social Welfare, the scheme provides FJD 100 per month to eligible seniors, with an additional FJD 25 monthly top-up for transport assistance for those aged 70+ or with disabilities. Funded by the national budget, SPS is Fiji’s largest social assistance programme, supporting over 50,000 beneficiaries and aiming to reduce poverty and improve mobility among older persons.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All older women and men in Fiji

What were the results?

The scheme covers over 50,000 beneficiaries, providing them basic income security. 

How was it developed and implemented?

It evolved from a means-tested targeted cash transfer to a more universal scheme, excluding only those who achieved superannuation through the Fiji National Pension Service. 

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides basic income security for older persons and also enables access to transportation for older persons through a specific transportation allowance. Thus, it also contributes to reducing isolation of older persons.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Women, Children and Social Protection
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Fiji
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2012
What was implemented?

The programme implements a home‑based and community‑linked support model for lonely older people. Volunteers provide social accompaniment at home, including household help, partial sanitary‑hygienic care, assistance with documents and subsidies, accompaniment to church, friendly visits, and moral support, with a stated goal of postponing institutionalization and ensuring that state services are properly delivered. The programme also secures goods of daily necessity such as food, hygiene and cleaning items, distributing both large surplus batches and individual gifts prepared according to recommended lists. In addition, the programme runs a cultural component that offers free tickets to theatres, concerts, and museums, as well as excursions and club meetings with tea to combat loneliness, and it delivers psychological counselling through an in‑person cabinet and psychotherapeutic groups at the Kuntsevsky Social Service Center.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The primary beneficiaries are lonely older adults, many of whom are persons with disabilities, whose finances are largely consumed by essential bills and medication. The model addresses material deprivation through the provision of basic goods and attends to social‑psychological needs through companionship, cultural participation, and counselling. It also reaches older people who are not ready to approach formal psychological or medical services, but who are willing to engage with the foundation’s psychologists in a lower‑barrier setting, thereby widening access to support for a highly vulnerable group.

What were the results?

Older people receive regular home‑based support, goods of daily necessity, free access to cultural events, and confidential psychological assistance in a format they perceive as simpler and non‑binding, which encourages participation. The home‑visit model helps mitigate loneliness and delay moves to nursing homes, while cultural activities and club meetings help restore social connections and interest in life following bereavement. The programme’s continuous operation since 1999, together with its expansion to multiple components, demonstrates institutional continuity and sustained impact rather than short‑term relief.

How was it developed and implemented?

The programme was the foundation’s first and began in 1999. It initially supplied veterans in Moscow’s Kuntsevo district with food packages and new clothing. Within a year, the programme expanded to include a cultural component and a clothing reception and distribution point, establishing the multi‑component model that has guided the initiative since then. Assistance continues under the foundation’s broader programmes “You will help—others will help you” and “Social support of the Kuntsevo district population.” The programme evolved from material support into a holistic, person‑centred approach that integrates practical home assistance, material aid, cultural engagement, and psychological support. Volunteers act as social companions and “do what a close relative would do,” while the foundation explicitly states that it does not replace social workers or other state services; instead, it seeks to ensure their delivery for beneficiaries. By partnering with a social service center to offer accessible counselling and group therapy, and by creating low‑threshold cultural activities, the programme enables older people to re‑engage socially in ways they find comfortable and non‑intimidating.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This practice is holistically designed, integrating practical home help, material aid, cultural engagement, and mental‑health support within a coherent, prevention‑oriented model. It explicitly aims to postpone institutionalization while ensuring the fulfilment of state services, complementing rather than duplicating public provision. Its low‑threshold, dignity‑affirming access enables seniors who avoid formal services to engage with counselling and cultural clubs, reducing isolation and despair. Finally, its proven longevity since 1999 and iterative expansion reflect sustainability and adaptability to evolving needs.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Non-government institution
Implementing/responsible entity:
Sofia Charitable Foundation and Kuntsevsky Social Service Center
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Ageing in place/housing); Health and well-being (Active and healthy ageing, Long-term care)
Country:
Russian Federation
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
1999- ongoing
What was implemented?

The Senior Able Citizens for Re-Employment in Dignity (SACRED) initiative, implemented by national and local Indian Governments, is an IT portal that was developed to bring the employment seeker senior citizens and employment providers on one platform. The portal aims to provide opportunities to well experienced senior citizens and pairs up employers and older employees based on experience, expertise and interest.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The initiative benefits experienced senior citizens across India seeking dignified re-employment. It also serves corporate employers, providing them access to a pool of seasoned professionals.

What were the results?

As of August 2022, a total of 4,527 senior citizens registered on the SACRED portal, with 63 actively applying for job opportunities via the platform.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by India’s Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, SACRED was launched by the Vice President in October 2021. The portal was technically opened in September 2021 to corporations for posting job vacancies, and the government continues promoting it among both job-seeking seniors and employers.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It fosters age-inclusive employment access through a dedicated, scalable digital platform—leveraging experience-driven senior talent while enhancing workforce diversity.

Supporting documents:
View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
India
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2021
What was implemented?

Wedihiti Awarana Kepakaru is a community-driven sponsorship scheme that pairs donors with destitute seniors who are ages 60+ and who do not have access to family support or formal pensions. Donors commit to a monthly stipend which is sent through the NSE directly into an elders bank account. This allows elders to receive a sustainable and non tax-funded income supplement.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Older persons in Sri Lanka, especially those without family support

What were the results?

This programme was scaled up through digital integration in 2026. The donor system has allowed many seniors to receive more support than the governments fixed senior allowance, helping them cover food and essential medicine costs. Additionally, having a donor separate from the government provides security for elderly, even in times of economic crisis. The social and emotional bond the elders often have with their donors is also beneficial, as they may receive holiday cards or visits from their donor. This reduces social isolation.

How was it developed and implemented?

An older person is identified through the local Village Elder Committee and priority is given to those over 70 without children or who live alone. A donor is matched with a senior and commits to a minimum period (usually 1 year). The donor pays the NSE, and the NSE deposits into the elders account. There are periodic visits to ensure the elder is receiving the money and that their needs are being met.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

This programme  fosters a sense of community and social solidarity, with the 'emotional adoption' that occurs.

Supporting documents:

https://www.readkong.com/page/long-term-care-for-older-persons-in-sri-lanka-4121768

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Private sector, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
The National Secretariat for Elders, Elder Rights Promotion Officers, and Individual/Corporate Donors
Categories:
Older persons and development (Participation of older persons); Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security)
Country:
Sri Lanka
Type of instrument:
Financial scheme
Year of implementation:
2000
What was implemented?

A programme aimed at enhancing lifelong learning opportunities and improving digital education access for all citizens. It seeks to foster Kazakhstan's scientific contributions to socio-economic development while equipping individuals with skills necessary for modern life, including digital literacy and entrepreneurship. "Silver Universities" have been established in 35 institutions, offering diverse programmes in digital skills, foreign languages, entrepreneurship, law, culture, religion, and physical activity, for individuals aged 50 and older.

Who were the beneficiaries?

All citizens with a particular emphasis on those aged 50 and above through the Silver Universities.

What were the results?

Silver Universities have been established in 35 institutions across the country. In addition, the total number of students enrolled in Silver University courses is about 2,000.

How was it developed and implemented?

Developed by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan with input from government ministries, national stakeholders, and universities. Implementation involves collaboration with higher education institutions which host Silver University programmes and adult learning opportunities.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

The programme supports inclusive life-long learning by extending educational opportunities to citizens of all ages and promoting digital literacy among other useful modern skills. The inclusion of Silver Universities for older persons demonstrates a commitment to active ageing, social participation, and empowerment of older adults through education.

Supporting documents:

https://ageing-policies.unece.org/browse-policy/2866

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
The Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan oversees the programme, with input from various government sectors and universities across the country.
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Life-long learning)
Country:
Kazakhstan
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2019
What was implemented?

The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust has partnered with Hong Kong’s four gerontology research institutes to implement the Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project (“JCAFC Project”) since 2015. The JCAFC Project aimed to promote an age-friendly culture in all 18 districts of Hong Kong. A unique model of bottom-up, district-based, multi-sectoral collaboration and evidence-based approach were adopted in building Hong Kong to an age-friendly city (“AFC”) which can cater for the needs of different ages. The book “Strategies for Creating an Age-friendly City: Hong Kong as a case study” thoroughly chronicles the strategies adopted by Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project in advancing age-friendly city movement in Hong Kong and its social impact, explores the origins of the concept of an age-friendly city and its development globally and in Hong Kong, as well as provides recommendations for the future advancement of age-friendly cities.

Who were the beneficiaries?

The main beneficiaries are local governments and district councils who can use the guidebook to plan and implement age-friendly policies and programmes. Community organizations and NGOs can further benefit from it. 

What were the results?

The guidebook informed district-level planning and contributed to a broader age-friendly city strategy in Hong Kong, China.

How was it developed and implemented?

The Age-Friendly City Case Book was developed under the Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project (JCAFC) through a collaborative, evidence-based process involving academic institutions, NGOs, and government agencies. It draws on five years of research and community engagement across Hong Kong’s 18 districts, including baseline assessments, surveys, and focus groups to identify local needs. The guidebook consolidates global and local best practices, practical tools, and templates for planning, implementing, and evaluating age-friendly initiatives. Its goal is to provide actionable resources for policymakers and communities to create inclusive, supportive environments for older adults.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

It provides a comprehensive toolkit—including assessment questionnaires, focus group protocols, and action-plan templates—that local governments and NGOs can use to implement age-friendly initiatives. Thus, it supports evidence-based policymaking and forms a basis for designing age-friendly cities. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Non-government institution, Academic
Implementing/responsible entity:
CUHK Jockey Club Institute of Ageing
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Ageing in place/housing, Disability and age friendly environment)
Country:
Hong Kong, China
Type of instrument:
Training or guidebook
Year of implementation:
2023
What was implemented?

The study conducted a qualitative evaluation to understand the policy context and lived experiences of ageing in Vanuatu. Researchers used a combination of policy mapping and semi‑structured interviews with 42 older ni‑Vanuatu adults to examine how national policies align with the needs and priorities of the ageing population. The analysis was guided by the WHO Regional Action Plan on Healthy Ageing in the Western Pacific. The research explored: (1) existing national policy commitments related to ageing, (2) gaps in explicit ageing‑related frameworks, (3) barriers older people face—including financial hardship, limited community support, and barriers to participation—and (4) strategic entry points for developing a national healthy‑ageing response. The study ultimately identified the need for improved evidence generation, stronger community engagement, culturally grounded approaches, and greater policy coordination to support healthy ageing in Vanuatu.

Who were the beneficiaries?

Policymakers in Vanuatu who benefit from evidence on ageing and the situation of older persons in Vanuatu. 

What were the results?

The study generated primary data on the situation of older persons in Vanuatu. 

How was it developed and implemented?

The research was conducted using a qualitative, multi‑method approach designed to understand both the policy environment and the lived experiences of older people in Vanuatu.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Academic, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
The George Institute, Vanuatu Ministry of Health
Categories:
Data and research
Country:
Vanuatu
Type of instrument:
Data
Year of implementation:
2024
What was implemented?

YADES is a national support programme launched in 2016 by the Ministry of Family and Social Services to help older persons live independently in their homes and communities through bio-psycho-social support, home care, technical assistance, and psychosocial services. YADES operates via municipalities under provincial supervision, funded 60% by the national budget and 40% by local co-financing, with 91 projects implemented between 2016–2024, benefiting over 159,000 older persons. The program emphasizes local ownership, community-based care, technology-driven safety solutions, and sustainability, aiming to improve quality of life, promote active ageing, and strengthen family-focused social work.

What were the results?

As of 2024, the following results were achieved:
91 projects were implemented across 54 municipalities under the program.

  • A total of 64.3 million TL was allocated to fund these initiatives.
  • 159,189 older persons received support, covering 106,069 households.
  • Services included psychosocial support, home care, technical assistance, mobile teams, and coordination centers.
  • The program strengthened local capacity, promoted community-based care, and introduced technology-supported models (e.g., smart monitoring systems for safety).
  • Key achievements: improved quality of life, active ageing, family-focused social work, and sustainability through co-financing and local ownership.
How was it developed and implemented?

The YADES program was developed by Türkiye’s Ministry of Family and Social Services in 2016 as a response to the country’s rapidly ageing population and growing care needs. It was designed as the first large-scale national grant program in the field of ageing, financed through the state budget and implemented by municipalities under provincial supervision.

What makes it a ‘good practice’?

YADES promotes community-based care and "ageing in place", allowing older persons to remain in their own homes and cared by communities. It promotes local ownership as it is implemented by municipalities. 

View More
Who implemented it?
Government
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Family and Social Services with local governments and minicipalities
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Age-friendly communities, Support to caregivers); Health and well-being (Long-term care)
Country:
Türkiye
Type of instrument:
Programme
Year of implementation:
2016 (initiated)
What was implemented?

The national dementia plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran places strong emphasis on supporting caregivers, recognizing them as central to ensuring quality care for people living with dementia. It adopts a family‑ and community‑centred approach, ensuring caregivers receive education, practical tools, and emotional support to manage the complex demands of dementia care.

1. The plan commits to raising awareness and empowering families. It provides structured caregiver education on understanding dementia, communication strategies, behavioural management, and self‑care. Specific materials support caregivers in recognizing symptoms, planning routines, and applying environmental modifications to reduce stress and confusion for the patient. Caregivers receive guidance on using memory aids, maintaining daily structure, managing safety risks, and understanding disease progression. 

2. The plan provides training for non‑professional caregivers, enabling them to deliver basic rehabilitative interventions. This includes support for assisting with activities of daily living, facilitating cognitive exercises, ensuring safe mobility, and incorporating compensatory strategies in daily routines. Caregivers are taught how to support independence while preventing hazards, including fall‑prevention techniques, adaptive feeding, and strategies for managing swallowing difficulties. 

3. Caregivers are supported through multidisciplinary teamwork, where psychologists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech therapists, nurses, and social workers offer counselling, emotional support, practical problem‑solving, and tailored care plans. Social workers help families cope with stress, maintain social inclusion, and access community resources and legal protections. Nurses provide home‑care guidance, respite strategies, and caregiver health assessments. 

4. The plan ensures ongoing follow‑up and monitoring, requiring health workers to track caregiver wellbeing and provide periodic training, home visits, and crisis support. This includes addressing caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, and burnout—acknowledged as critical risks influencing care quality. 

5. The plan integrates caregivers into decision‑making and encourages their participation in rehabilitation programs, support groups, and education sessions, ensuring they are not isolated in their responsibilities.

How was it developed and implemented?

The national dementia plan was developed through a multi‑stage, collaborative process. A Strategic Council, two technical committees, and experts from health, rehabilitation, and social sectors guided its creation. First, a draft was prepared based on existing system structures and international guidance. This draft was circulated to academics, specialists, and relevant organizations for review. Feedback was gathered through group discussions, revised, and integrated into a second and third draft. After multiple expert consultations and revisions, the final version was approved and disseminated to health authorities for implementation.

View More
Who implemented it?
Government, Others
Implementing/responsible entity:
Ministry of Health
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers); Implementation and follow-up (Implementation/action plan)
Country:
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Type of instrument:
Action plan
Year of implementation:
2016

Suggested citation: ESCAP, Database of Good Practices on Population Ageing, available at: https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/repositories/good-practices

 

About

Policies are based on: Submissions from ESCAP members and associate members, and research by ESCAP staff, supported by AI tools, including using related databases.

Note: These good practices represent a selection of approaches to implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. There is no claim to completeness.

Categories & Design

Categories and sub-categories align with:

o Priority directions in the 2002 Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing
o Outcome document of the Asia-Pacific Intergovernmental Meeting on the Fourth Review and Appraisal of MIPAA (2022)

Tutorial

Watch a short video on how to use the database of good practices.

Acknowledgements

This database is brought to you by the collective efforts of the Social Development Division of ESCAP, focal points on ageing from ESCAP member States who submitted good practices as well as many collaborators who have compiled, drafted and edited content for this website as well as the technical team that has developed the database and ensures its functionalities. We also acknowledge the efforts made by ECE and their contributors to compiled a related database.

Related resources

You may also find the following databases and resources useful:

AARP Toolkit of Actions on Ageing

ECE Ageing Policies Database

UN Decade of Healthy Ageing Knowledge Platform

WHO Global Platform of age-friendly practices

Disclaimer

ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Suggested citation: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Database of good practices on ageing. Online.